SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Competitive Flames Team

Créé par: TheFlamingC
Équipe: 2021-22 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 4 juill. 2021
Publié: 4 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
For the record, I think they should rebuild
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 425 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
21 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 500 000 $
68 000 000 $
68 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
BUF
  1. Andersson, Rasmus
  2. Monahan, Sean
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (CGY)
3.
CGY
ANA
  1. Lucic, Milan
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
Détails additionnels:
Anywhere
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de EDM
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2023
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $73 874 999 $0 $47 500 $7 625 001 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 8
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $
AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
903 333 $903 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 167 $894 167 $
AG, C
RFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
801 666 $801 666 $ (Bonis de performance15 000 $$15K)
AG, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
4 juill. 2021 à 19 h 50
#1
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,288
Mentions "j'aime": 10,627
Valimaki is no where near 1st pairing ready. Landeskog isn't signing here IMO. Doubt Dougie signs here
4 juill. 2021 à 19 h 51
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,878
Mentions "j'aime": 974
Try again
TheLamb9 a aimé ceci.
4 juill. 2021 à 20 h 5
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,318
Mentions "j'aime": 19,558
Dougie's not coming back so Flames won't be moving Andersson (who should bounce back this year). it will probably cost a boat of assets for Eichel though if Monahan is in there instead of Tkachuk
4 juill. 2021 à 21 h 6
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 3,446
Mentions "j'aime": 1,805
Quoting: Gmonwy
Valimaki is no where near 1st pairing ready. Landeskog isn't signing here IMO. Doubt Dougie signs here


Nobody else can play 1st pair either. Probably not to Landeskog. Probably not to Dougie.
4 juill. 2021 à 21 h 7
#5
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,288
Mentions "j'aime": 10,627
Quoting: TheFlamingC
Nobody else can play 1st pair either. Probably not to Landeskog. Probably not to Dougie.


Why not Hanifin?
4 juill. 2021 à 21 h 8
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 3,446
Mentions "j'aime": 1,805
Quoting: RoyalBlueSabres
Try again


I’m trading for Eichel, not God, sorry. Your out of luck. No reason at all the Sabres should accept a trade of a top 6 C, top pair D and top 15 pick
4 juill. 2021 à 21 h 8
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 3,446
Mentions "j'aime": 1,805
Quoting: Gmonwy
Why not Hanifin?



I wanted to have him with Tanev to keep that pair together
4 juill. 2021 à 21 h 9
#8
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,288
Mentions "j'aime": 10,627
Quoting: TheFlamingC
I wanted to have him with Tanev to keep that pair together


Put them 1st pairing then lol
4 juill. 2021 à 22 h 23
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 3,761
Mentions "j'aime": 972
Simply evaluating the roster: F look good, but not sure D is deep enough.
Gmonwy et TheFlamingC a aimé ceci.
4 juill. 2021 à 23 h 45
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 556
Mentions "j'aime": 108
Sorry not even close for eichel.
5 juill. 2021 à 2 h 41
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 3,446
Mentions "j'aime": 1,805
Quoting: earl08
Simply evaluating the roster: F look good, but not sure D is deep enough.


Fair
5 juill. 2021 à 2 h 42
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 3,446
Mentions "j'aime": 1,805
Quoting: Sabres1973
Sorry not even close for eichel.


Filling every one of Buffalos needs and then throwing in a top 15 pick isn’t good enough? Got it.
5 juill. 2021 à 6 h 4
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 556
Mentions "j'aime": 108
Quoting: TheFlamingC
Filling every one of Buffalos needs and then throwing in a top 15 pick isn’t good enough? Got it.


It’s just not the players we want. We are giving up a great young center (top5-7 center in the league who is 24) and you want us to take back a center who is gonna be 27 in October and will be coming off hip surgery and has had hip surgery before. I like Monahan, he is a great player but just not what the Sabres need now. If we did trade for him I would be ok just not thrilled. It’s definitely a downgrade from eichel. Plus we would also need a forward prospect. We are in a retool mode. It will unfortunately probably take us at least 2 years before we get back to the playoffs so by then he would be 29. His last 2 years he has regressed. Last year he had 28 points in 50 games. Last year Reinhart had almost as many goals as Monahan had points. It’s not that I don’t like him it’s just the wrong time to take a chance that he might rebound
5 juill. 2021 à 9 h 49
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 3,761
Mentions "j'aime": 972
Quoting: Sabres1973
It’s just not the players we want. We are giving up a great young center (top5-7 center in the league who is 24) and you want us to take back a center who is gonna be 27 in October and will be coming off hip surgery and has had hip surgery before. I like Monahan, he is a great player but just not what the Sabres need now. If we did trade for him I would be ok just not thrilled. It’s definitely a downgrade from eichel. Plus we would also need a forward prospect. We are in a retool mode. It will unfortunately probably take us at least 2 years before we get back to the playoffs so by then he would be 29. His last 2 years he has regressed. Last year he had 28 points in 50 games. Last year Reinhart had almost as many goals as Monahan had points. It’s not that I don’t like him it’s just the wrong time to take a chance that he might rebound


It's very close. Duchene returned: Turris, Bowers, a protected 1st, a 3rd, & Hammond. Turris morphed into: Girard, Kamenev, & a 2nd. So the eventual return was: Girard, Bowers, Kamenev, a 1st, a 2nd, a 3rd, & Hammond. The Avs took a chance that one of the three prospects would pan out, and luckily Girard did. But nothing was guaranteed. Bowers is looking like a bottom sixer if he ever makes it. Kamenev already fizzled out.

In the above proposal, CGY is sending back two established, impact players. Given Eichel's status, I think it could use one more decent asset, like a pick or prospect, to be fair value.
5 juill. 2021 à 21 h 41
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,878
Mentions "j'aime": 974
Quoting: TheFlamingC
I’m trading for Eichel, not God, sorry. Your out of luck. No reason at all the Sabres should accept a trade of a top 6 C, top pair D and top 15 pick


Eichel is a superstar. I do not need a top 6 C that doesnt fit the Buf timeline a D prospect for a team needing offence and a top 15 pick in a weaker draft.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage