SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Offseason Moves - Dallas

Créé par: Hockyluv21
Équipe: 2021-22 Stars de Dallas
Date de création initiale: 30 juin 2021
Publié: 30 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
With the additions of Coleman, Gardiner, Dellandrea (full season), and Hamonic, the Stars should be playoff contenders again, especially if Oettinger takes the next step.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
87 000 000 $
31 200 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 500 000 $
44 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
DAL
  1. Gardiner, Jake
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (CAR)
2.
DAL
    Protected: Seguin, Benn, Pavelski, Radulov, Faksa, Hintz, Gurianov, Lindell, Heiskanen, Klingberg, Bishop
    SEA
    1. Dickinson, Jason [Droits de RFA]
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    2022
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    2023
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2281 500 000 $81 777 073 $927 073 $1 157 500 $-277 073 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
    AG, C
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    9 850 000 $9 850 000 $
    C, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
    AD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
    C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
    AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
    G
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
    4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    4 916 667 $4 916 667 $
    G
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    750 000 $750 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    750 000 $750 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    30 juin 2021 à 2 h 36
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2017
    Messages: 1,574
    Mentions "j'aime": 455
    Heiskanen should fire his agent if he suggests that deal.
    30 juin 2021 à 2 h 38
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2017
    Messages: 1,574
    Mentions "j'aime": 455
    Do the stars have to expose Dickinson for the player requirement? (I get they don't protect him, but does he have to meet the player requirement clause?) Because I figure they could probably trade him for some decent return.
    30 juin 2021 à 6 h 46
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 19,537
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,032
    Carolina don't need an injury prone goaltender. They have a starter with Nedeljkovic, they'll sign a backup. I appreciate the reasons for it, but it would still need to be at a position of need for Carolina
    30 juin 2021 à 7 h 25
    #4
    kevo
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2021
    Messages: 42
    Mentions "j'aime": 3
    Bishop starts. The only way he doesn't is if he plays absolutely awfully
    30 juin 2021 à 8 h 59
    #5
    True Reverse Retro
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2018
    Messages: 4,627
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,038
    Quoting: TooMalevolent
    Do the stars have to expose Dickinson for the player requirement? (I get they don't protect him, but does he have to meet the player requirement clause?) Because I figure they could probably trade him for some decent return.


    The Stars don't HAVE to expose Dickinson for the expansion requirement (he doesn't meet it anyway), but after the Stars signed Comeau the prevailing thought was that they made that signing so that they could protect Faksa. I fully expect the Stars to go with the following protection list:

    Benn
    Seguin
    Radulov
    Pavelski
    Hintz
    Gurianov
    Faksa

    Klingberg
    Lindell
    Heiskanen

    Bishop

    I personally, would protect Dickinson over Faksa, and not to trade. Dickinson is simply the better player & a guy that I re-sign and keep in my bottom-6.
    TooMalevolent a aimé ceci.
    30 juin 2021 à 9 h 31
    #6
    Hurricane Waddell
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 8,734
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,601
    You know there is a decent chance that Gardiner doesn’t play again, right? Sounds like he’s contemplating a 3rd back surgery.
    30 juin 2021 à 11 h 9
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 6,694
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
    Quoting: Caniac555
    You know there is a decent chance that Gardiner doesn’t play again, right? Sounds like he’s contemplating a 3rd back surgery.


    Apparently that got debunked. One of the Canes beat reporters tweeted that he’s playing in one of the summer tournaments. I thought that would be the case too but if he’s playing in an exhibition summer tournament chances are no surgery on the horizon.
    TooMalevolent a aimé ceci.
    30 juin 2021 à 11 h 32
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2017
    Messages: 1,574
    Mentions "j'aime": 455
    Quoting: vikhodush
    Apparently that got debunked. One of the Canes beat reporters tweeted that he’s playing in one of the summer tournaments. I thought that would be the case too but if he’s playing in an exhibition summer tournament chances are no surgery on the horizon.


    I'm a big Gardiner fan, but it would have to be a huge turn around from a debilitating injury for it to be worth a team taking a chance on him. It's a ton of money for more than a year. I don't understand, why not just give Oleksiak that money (better player now and probably does not hit 4).
    30 juin 2021 à 11 h 33
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2017
    Messages: 1,574
    Mentions "j'aime": 455
    Quoting: TheMooterus
    The Stars don't HAVE to expose Dickinson for the expansion requirement (he doesn't meet it anyway), but after the Stars signed Comeau the prevailing thought was that they made that signing so that they could protect Faksa. I fully expect the Stars to go with the following protection list:

    Benn
    Seguin
    Radulov
    Pavelski
    Hintz
    Gurianov
    Faksa

    Klingberg
    Lindell
    Heiskanen

    Bishop

    I personally, would protect Dickinson over Faksa, and not to trade. Dickinson is simply the better player & a guy that I re-sign and keep in my bottom-6.


    What is your best thought on what a return would be for him/a contract term? Has there been any talk in the market?
    30 juin 2021 à 11 h 56
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 6,694
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
    Quoting: TooMalevolent
    I'm a big Gardiner fan, but it would have to be a huge turn around from a debilitating injury for it to be worth a team taking a chance on him. It's a ton of money for more than a year. I don't understand, why not just give Oleksiak that money (better player now and probably does not hit 4).


    Nah I’m with you. I’m a canes fan but as a stars fan I wouldn’t be taking him on. To your point Oleksiak is better all around even if he doesn’t have the offensive ceiling that a healthy Gardiner has and doesn’t have a back injury concern lingering over him. But as a Canes fan would love to move his cap hit smile
    EsoYeezus69 a aimé ceci.
    30 juin 2021 à 13 h 44
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 70
    Mentions "j'aime": 31
    Quoting: Caniac2000
    Carolina don't need an injury prone goaltender. They have a starter with Nedeljkovic, they'll sign a backup. I appreciate the reasons for it, but it would still need to be at a position of need for Carolina


    Was the OP changed or are you confusing Bishop and Khudobin?
    1 juill. 2021 à 7 h 42
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 19,537
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,032
    Quoting: JCWM2
    Was the OP changed or are you confusing Bishop and Khudobin?


    Khudobin is injury-prone. Bishop is made of glass.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage