SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

One Last Ride Eichel plus depth FAs

Créé par: DrumMan44
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 24 juin 2021
Publié: 24 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
If Toews comes back, this is an attempt to get two last chances of contending out of #19 and #88 before their contracts are up.

Note on LTIR. My understanding is that you can be 10% above the cap during the summer, then place player on LTIR just before the season begins.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 750 000 $
11 500 000 $
11 500 000 $
11 500 000 $
13 200 000 $
11 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 500 000 $
44 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
    Expansion draft deal. Get Strome for taking CdH
    2.
    CHI
    1. Eichel, Jack
    Détails additionnels:
    This is a solid offer. Dach could be a future 1C and Reichel is a potential top 6 winger. Plus whoever you grab at #11 in this year's draft.
    BUF
    1. Dach, Kirby
    2. Reichel, Lukas
    3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (CHI)
    3.
    CHI
    1. Holtby, Braden (2 150 000 $ retained)
    VAN
    1. Subban, Malcolm
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (CHI)
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de FLA
    2022
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    2023
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $70 552 676 $452 439 $1 732 500 $10 947 324 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    800 000 $800 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    -150 000 $-150 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
    DG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
    AG, C, AD
    RFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    24 juin 2021 à 16 h 1
    #1
    BRUCE THERE IT IS
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2020
    Messages: 1,648
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,183
    Canucks deal
    24 juin 2021 à 16 h 3
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 745
    Mentions "j'aime": 238
    Sabres Accept
    sabres89, SalamiCheese et Dcochy a aimé ceci.
    24 juin 2021 à 16 h 49
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2017
    Messages: 3,214
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,078
    Canucks accept
    24 juin 2021 à 20 h 0
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2019
    Messages: 4,986
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
    Im sorry, but these trades are really poorly executed. All 3 have very bad effects for CHI.
    25 juin 2021 à 9 h 15
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    Drumman44
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2017
    Messages: 698
    Mentions "j'aime": 259
    Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
    Im sorry, but these trades are really poorly executed. All 3 have very bad effects for CHI.


    I mean, to get a top center in the league (who is 24 years old), you're going to have to give up something of value. The whole idea here is to give Kane and Toews one last shot at contention before their deals expire in two seasons.

    With that angle in mind, what would you change? Or are you firmly in the camp of building through the draft / acquiring younger players?
    25 juin 2021 à 19 h 57
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2019
    Messages: 4,986
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
    Quoting: DrumMan44
    I mean, to get a top center in the league (who is 24 years old), you're going to have to give up something of value. The whole idea here is to give Kane and Toews one last shot at contention before their deals expire in two seasons.

    With that angle in mind, what would you change? Or are you firmly in the camp of building through the draft / acquiring younger players?


    I don't think it solely has to be through the draft but its certainly a good angle to take. I also like to take into account cap situation and building a better team rather than a top heavy one.

    Why I disagree with this proposed Eichel trade is the fact that it includes not only Dach but Reichel as well, for whom the organisation has big hopes for and he has shown good quality against men albeit in the DEL but more recently at the Worlds. I also think taking on Eichel's cap hit prohibits us from getting the right pieces around and growing organically from within and takes away flexibility from adding to what could be a talented core in the next couple of years if we stay the course.

    as for the other trades, they should be self explanatory, Holtby wasn't great last year and even retained isn't worth a 2nd + 5th (subban). Strom is worth a 2nd + 3rd and I may hold an unpopular opinion but DeHaan can actually defend and Imo is not a cap dump that needs to happen. Yes he has fitness issues with his shoulders but when he plays he is one of our best D man.
    27 juin 2021 à 11 h 38
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    Drumman44
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2017
    Messages: 698
    Mentions "j'aime": 259
    Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk


    Why I disagree with this proposed Eichel trade is the fact that it includes not only Dach but Reichel as well, for whom the organisation has big hopes for and he has shown good quality against men albeit in the DEL but more recently at the Worlds. I also think taking on Eichel's cap hit prohibits us from getting the right pieces around and growing organically from within and takes away flexibility from adding to what could be a talented core in the next couple of years if we stay the course.


    I agree with you on this. I don't think the Hawks should trade for Eichel, but this is what I think it would take if they did trade for him.

    I think that anyone over 25 should be actively shopped TBH. Even if that means losing 2, 19, and 88.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage