SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

flames rebuild

Créé par: pastrnak_is_my_dad
Équipe: 2021-22 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 22 juin 2021
Publié: 22 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
canucks dont have the cap to match offer on quinn hughes
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
33 000 000 $
11 500 000 $
55 000 000 $
410 907 734 $
32 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
Offres hostiles
Le salaire annuel moyen (AAV) de l'offre hostile est calculé en divisant la valeur totale du contrat par: 1. La durée totale du contrat, ou 2. Cinq ans
JOUEURAAVCOMPENSATION
Hughes, Quinn10 907 734 $
Choix de 1e ronde en 2022
Choix de 2e ronde en 2022
Choix de 3e ronde en 2022
Choix de 1e ronde en 2023
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Carlo, Brandon [Droits de RFA]
  2. DeBrusk, Jake
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
Détails additionnels:
(first turns into raty)
flames get 2 great players and raty
BOS
  1. Tkachuk, Matthew
Détails additionnels:
bruins really bolster their top 6
2.
CGY
  1. Broberg, Philip
  2. Jones, Caleb
  3. Yamamoto, Kailer [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
more prospects for calgary
EDM
  1. Gaudreau, Johnny
Détails additionnels:
winger for mcdavid
3.
CGY
  1. Bean, Jake [Droits de RFA]
CAR
  1. Giordano, Mark (3 000 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de BOS
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de EDM
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de FLA
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2023
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $74 158 567 $0 $20 000 $7 341 433 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 675 000 $3 675 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
725 000 $725 000 $
C
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
10 907 734 $10 907 734 $
DG
UFA - 6
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
813 333 $813 333 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
G
RFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 juin 2021 à 20 h 37
#1
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,436
Mentions "j'aime": 10,745
WE AREN'T REBUILDING UNDER SUTTER. Also we aren't helping Edmonton. Hughes can't be offersheeted. Wolf isn't ready to NHL
22 juin 2021 à 20 h 39
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 798
Mentions "j'aime": 113
Quoting: Gmonwy
WE AREN'T REBUILDING UNDER SUTTER. Also we aren't helping Edmonton. Hughes can't be offersheeted. Wolf isn't ready to NHL


this was just for fun lmao also calgary is going to rebuild lmao again if tkachuk is leaving then there will be a rebuild no if ands or buts about it
22 juin 2021 à 20 h 40
#3
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,436
Mentions "j'aime": 10,745
Quoting: pastrnak_is_my_dad
this was just for fun lmao also calgary is going to rebuild lmao again if tkachuk is leaving then there will be a rebuild no if ands or buts about it


Then Sutter will leave that would be 4 coaches throughout 2ish years no one will want to come here(coaches or players) and there has been no official news
22 juin 2021 à 20 h 41
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 798
Mentions "j'aime": 113
Quoting: Gmonwy
Then Sutter will leave that would be 4 coaches throughout 2ish years no one will want to come here(coaches or players) and there has been no official news


true however if the news is true then they will need to rebuild calgary has not gotten anything done at all
22 juin 2021 à 20 h 47
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 9,527
Mentions "j'aime": 8,968
great is not an adjective that should be used to describe debrusk. your next mistake is paying your D almost as much as a forward corps that contains lucic. simon doesn’t deserve his QO, let alone a raise, he’s garbage. this team would literally never score, you’d be lucky to get 160 goals out of this group
22 juin 2021 à 20 h 55
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 2,771
Mentions "j'aime": 1,386
Hughes is not eligible for an offer sheet
22 juin 2021 à 21 h 1
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 798
Mentions "j'aime": 113
Quoting: Alfie11
great is not an adjective that should be used to describe debrusk. your next mistake is paying your D almost as much as a forward corps that contains lucic. simon doesn’t deserve his QO, let alone a raise, he’s garbage. this team would literally never score, you’d be lucky to get 160 goals out of this group


they are rebuilding dawg
22 juin 2021 à 21 h 4
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,940
Mentions "j'aime": 19,965
DeBrusks QO is 4.85M... I feel like there are better odds he isn't qualified for that
Gmonwy a aimé ceci.
22 juin 2021 à 21 h 44
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,696
Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
Canes pass.
22 juin 2021 à 23 h 22
#10
themriley
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 77
Mentions "j'aime": 34
Oilers don't make that trade. Gaudreau isn't worth that.
23 juin 2021 à 7 h 48
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 798
Mentions "j'aime": 113
Quoting: themacriley
Oilers don't make that trade. Gaudreau isn't worth that.


there are talks of caleb jones literally getting taken in the expansion draft so its 2 solid prospects for a former 99 point scorer edmonton accepts easily and plays him with mcdavid
23 juin 2021 à 8 h 2
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,272
Mentions "j'aime": 140
Bruins take that deal. Hard to lose Carlo. But we could trade or pickup a 2RD.
23 juin 2021 à 18 h 46
#13
themriley
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 77
Mentions "j'aime": 34
Quoting: pastrnak_is_my_dad
there are talks of caleb jones literally getting taken in the expansion draft so its 2 solid prospects for a former 99 point scorer edmonton accepts easily and plays him with mcdavid


Yes based on expansion draft rules, he's the best available exposed player, but that isn't saying that he's not great. Gaudreau has one year left at 6.75 million. Broberg is a highly rated LD prospect that may end up replacing a LTIR'd Klefbom sooner than later, Yamamoto had a rough season points wise, but was still very good and young. There are better options that probably cost less and have more term.
23 juin 2021 à 18 h 47
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 798
Mentions "j'aime": 113
Quoting: themacriley
Yes based on expansion draft rules, he's the best available exposed player, but that isn't saying that he's not great. Gaudreau has one year left at 6.75 million. Broberg is a highly rated LD prospect that may end up replacing a LTIR'd Klefbom sooner than later, Yamamoto had a rough season points wise, but was still very good and young. There are better options that probably cost less and have more term.


well if hes going to be lost for no value might as well get some if hes going in the draft his value is obv going to decrease
23 juin 2021 à 22 h 3
#15
themriley
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 77
Mentions "j'aime": 34
Quoting: pastrnak_is_my_dad
well if hes going to be lost for no value might as well get some if hes going in the draft his value is obv going to decrease


Yes that happens in expansion draft. AT least 2/3 of the teams are most likely going to lose a decent player. This trade isn't worth it. You could pay a 5th for them to take lagesson over jones, and it'd work for Seattle.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage