SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Another Nylander opotion

Créé par: Rodzikhockey93
Équipe: 2016-17 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 30 janv. 2017
Publié: 30 janv. 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2017 (BOS)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2017
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
Logo de NJD
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de BOS
Logo de TOR
2018
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de ARI
Logo de TOR
Logo de ANA
2019
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2173 000 000 $59 005 333 $512 000 $5 947 500 $13 994 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
4 200 000 $4 200 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 3
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
UFA - 3
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C
UFA - 3
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
AD, AG, C
UFA - 2
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
UFA - 6
686 667 $686 667 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
675 000 $675 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
736 666 $736 666 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 5
4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
742 500 $742 500 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
DG
UFA - 2
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
30 janv. 2017 à 15 h 59
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 307
Mentions "j'aime": 24
Why would Carolina do this?
30 janv. 2017 à 16 h 13
#2
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,855
Mentions "j'aime": 22,863
Nylander and Aho are about even. But Faulk and Slavin are NHL Dmen. Carrick is an NHLer, Gauthier is a 4th liner, Rychel is an AHLer and a distant pick. Why trade one of your top six Dman (Hunwick) to playoff competitor? From the Leafs view, trading 4 regulars when you're making a playoff push doesn't seem beneficial.
gunshot125 a aimé ceci.
30 janv. 2017 à 16 h 16
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 274
Mentions "j'aime": 12
Quoting: palhal
Nylander and Aho are about even.


Nah, Nylander is much better imo.
30 janv. 2017 à 16 h 18
#4
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,855
Mentions "j'aime": 22,863
Quoting: gunshot125
Quoting: palhal
Nylander and Aho are about even.


Nah, Nylander is much better imo.


I kinda think he is more valuable to Leafs also, cause he might be their centre of the future (behind Matthews).
30 janv. 2017 à 18 h 26
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,595
Mentions "j'aime": 6,735
Quoting: palhal
Nylander and Aho are about even. But Faulk and Slavin are NHL Dmen. Carrick is an NHLer, Gauthier is a 4th liner, Rychel is an AHLer and a distant pick. Why trade one of your top six Dman (Hunwick) to playoff competitor? From the Leafs view, trading 4 regulars when you're making a playoff push doesn't seem beneficial.


Wait? Are you saying you wouldn't do this????????????????????? Christ palhal, the Leaf bias is strong with you lately isn't it?

Faulk is an all-star RH top pairing dman on a good contract. Is that not the EXACT thing T.O is looking for?
Slavin is a young cheap top 4 stud dman. Another young stud dman to add the team? Whats not to like.
Aho is a talented winger with great skills. He is not as good as Nylander probably but is he so far off? Not really. Maybe he isn't a potential 80 pt player but 60 pt isn't out of possibility. He's already not that far behind Nylander and is 1 year younger......

All NHL regulars on most teams in the NHL today.

Nylander is the best piece here from Toronto, no doubt there. He can be a good player going forward.

But Carrick. Gauthier, Rychel are fringe to depth only NHLer's at the moment. Carrick does not make the Habs lineup when they are healthy. Neither does Gauthier nor Rychel.

Aho, Faulk, Slavin all make the Habs roster right now. No questions asked.

Toronto should take this and run..... LIKE...... HELL!
30 janv. 2017 à 20 h 28
#6
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,855
Mentions "j'aime": 22,863
FMarco: I think the Leafs should make the Canes deal. I still say Rychel is meaningless in the trade and say Nylander is of more value than Aho. Didn't I say that.? Still wouldn't trade Hunwick to Boston.
Don't think it helps the Leafs short term, but long term yes.
30 janv. 2017 à 22 h 37
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,595
Mentions "j'aime": 6,735
Quoting: palhal
FMarco: I think the Leafs should make the Canes deal. I still say Rychel is meaningless in the trade and say Nylander is of more value than Aho. Didn't I say that.? Still wouldn't trade Hunwick to Boston.
Don't think it helps the Leafs short term, but long term yes.


My apologies palhal. Sounded like you were questioning why T.O would even make this deal! I couldn't believe my eyes. cheers
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage