SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Small Moves Big Results

Créé par: JohnPance
Équipe: 2021-22 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 10 juin 2021
Publié: 10 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Clifford will add some size and "Grit" and is not a defensive liability. Sure scoring isn't a big thing from him but we don't need a 4th line that can score at will. In addition, Blackwell and Nick Paul are good players that can score and are effective on D.

I think this team is solid at both ends. We have the youth but we need the veteran solid Defensive forwards to balance the skill while saving money and room for bonuses and growth.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
46 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
1850 000 $
1850 000 $
21 250 000 $
21 250 000 $
1850 000 $
46 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
NYR
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
3.
STL
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (NYR)
4.
NYR
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (OTT)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de BUF
Logo de LAK
Logo de OTT
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYR
Logo de OTT
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2022
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2023
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $69 324 051 $0 $9 650 000 $12 175 949 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
749 250 $749 250 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
725 000 $725 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
737 500 $737 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 juin 2021 à 8 h 27
#1
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,695
Mentions "j'aime": 11,486
Blues accept.
JohnPance et Masonh618 a aimé ceci.
10 juin 2021 à 8 h 33
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 5,590
Mentions "j'aime": 3,002
The Detroit deal looks OK value-wise but Detroit already have 9 waiver eligible wingers penned in for next season and I doubt that Yzerman would trade for a player only to have to waive him.
Masonh618 a aimé ceci.
10 juin 2021 à 8 h 46
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,991
Mentions "j'aime": 877
What in God's name is that Ottawa trade? Why are we giving up Chytil for that, instead of some Mid Round Pick?
10 juin 2021 à 8 h 48
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 6,332
Mentions "j'aime": 2,560
Too much for shesty unless you get max term. 4-5m for 4-6yrs or 6-7 for 8 yrs
10 juin 2021 à 12 h 38
#5
Démarrer sujet
John
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 404
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Quoting: Shakabakes
What in God's name is that Ottawa trade? Why are we giving up Chytil for that, instead of some Mid Round Pick?


Chytl has potential but is a terrible Center. His value is not high. Nick Paul is a very capable and defensively reliable forward that could ensure a competitive and responsible 3/4 line. Should Chytl command more, yes, will he, doubtful. You can’t trade for players that teams don’t need to move and not overpay.
10 juin 2021 à 12 h 41
#6
Démarrer sujet
John
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 404
Mentions "j'aime": 11
I’m addition, Howden SUCKS, and it would
Literally be a cap dump. Also, you can’t have all young kids on the team to specially in shut down roles. You need someone who knows what to do. Nick Paul played for a garbage Ottawa team and did very well, one would assume he would play even better for the Rangers and he’s very cheap which is essential for this team for the next few years
10 juin 2021 à 12 h 43
#7
Démarrer sujet
John
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 404
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Quoting: NYR1983
Too much for shesty unless you get max term. 4-5m for 4-6yrs or 6-7 for 8 yrs


Yeah I don’t think so. Goalies with his caliber and his age are getting paid. If he’s not paid what he wants, he will leave. The term is really important here. I am not a fan of max contracts as they’re stupid, see Kreider and almost every other max contract ever. 4 years is a safe term that capitalized on his prime and allows him to make a decision on his future. Also it gives us time to groom another goalie as needed
10 juin 2021 à 12 h 47
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,991
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Quoting: JohnPance
Chytl has potential but is a terrible Center. His value is not high. Nick Paul is a very capable and defensively reliable forward that could ensure a competitive and responsible 3/4 line. Should Chytl command more, yes, will he, doubtful. You can’t trade for players that teams don’t need to move and not overpay.


Then he won't be a C. He may be playing out of position, but he still has a lot of potential for the future. And is just coming off his ELC.

Nick Paul is solid Defensively, but he's a bottom 6 Forward entering a Contract year.

And you're also asking for Howden, on top of that. If anything, I would go as high as Howden and a 4th. Good player, but not a desperate need for 1 year of him.
10 juin 2021 à 13 h 7
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 6,332
Mentions "j'aime": 2,560
Quoting: JohnPance
Yeah I don’t think so. Goalies with his caliber and his age are getting paid. If he’s not paid what he wants, he will leave. The term is really important here. I am not a fan of max contracts as they’re stupid, see Kreider and almost every other max contract ever. 4 years is a safe term that capitalized on his prime and allows him to make a decision on his future. Also it gives us time to groom another goalie as needed


So you want to pay him Binnington money after playing less that 50 games? And you think it’s justified. I don’t disagree he is a high caliber G, but so was Hank, what was his contract?? Let me tell you..

05/06 ELC 53GP
06/07 ELC 70GP
07/08 4.25M bridge 72GP

Then 6yr x 6.7M
Masonh618 a aimé ceci.
10 juin 2021 à 14 h 50
#10
Démarrer sujet
John
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 404
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Quoting: NYR1983
So you want to pay him Binnington money after playing less that 50 games? And you think it’s justified. I don’t disagree he is a high caliber G, but so was Hank, what was his contract?? Let me tell you..

05/06 ELC 53GP
06/07 ELC 70GP
07/08 4.25M bridge 72GP

Then 6yr x 6.7M


I’m not arguing with you that the price is scary but at his age and with his career already I think he’s going to get paid or maybe walk away. Don’t forget he was paid handsomely in Russia and would be paid even more now. He’s also 25 years old. Hank was also grossly underpaid then cost us a fortune in his later years so this could be a way to build some good faith and maybe save some millions down the road ... there’s no wrong answer here. We will see what happens
NYR1983 a aimé ceci.
10 juin 2021 à 14 h 52
#11
Démarrer sujet
John
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 404
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Quoting: Shakabakes
Then he won't be a C. He may be playing out of position, but he still has a lot of potential for the future. And is just coming off his ELC.

Nick Paul is solid Defensively, but he's a bottom 6 Forward entering a Contract year.

And you're also asking for Howden, on top of that. If anything, I would go as high as Howden and a 4th. Good player, but not a desperate need for 1 year of him.


Wait, Chytl aside, you think Howden is an NHL caliber 4th line center? Howden is terrible, he’s a cap dump in this trade, that’s why I’m giving up Chytl because you have to overpay to move Howden. Howden is not good
10 juin 2021 à 14 h 59
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 6,332
Mentions "j'aime": 2,560
Quoting: JohnPance
I’m not arguing with you that the price is scary but at his age and with his career already I think he’s going to get paid or maybe walk away. Don’t forget he was paid handsomely in Russia and would be paid even more now. He’s also 25 years old. Hank was also grossly underpaid then cost us a fortune in his later years so this could be a way to build some good faith and maybe save some millions down the road ... there’s no wrong answer here. We will see what happens


Losing him is the only wrong answer so we will wait and see what happens 🤞🏼.
JohnPance a aimé ceci.
10 juin 2021 à 16 h 3
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,991
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Quoting: JohnPance
Wait, Chytl aside, you think Howden is an NHL caliber 4th line center? Howden is terrible, he’s a cap dump in this trade, that’s why I’m giving up Chytl because you have to overpay to move Howden. Howden is not good


We know Howden is terrible. Didn't know if you did.

Either way, he's not making enough to be a Cap dump. We could just cut ties with him altogether by not Qualifying him, if need be. By no means are we that desperate to get rid of him that we need to sacrifice Chytil.
Masonh618 a aimé ceci.
10 juin 2021 à 22 h 28
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
CHI declines, we have a logjam of LD.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage