These are all terrible for the Canucks. Also, Seattle isn't taking Holtby

Patrick can be a 3c for their future if it plays out right(don't get me wrong it's a risk though),seattle taking hotlby is kinda for the sake of the gm not gonna lie but hey it's possible,schmidt wants out and zucker can be great depth(you could get more for him somewhere else though),rielly would be a massive upgrade on edler and podkozlin could take hoglanders spot.

Hell no to that damn leafs trade

Patrick will not be traded alone he's going to be a part of a bigger trade.

Schmidt doesn't want out. Rielly is a UFA you're an idiot if you think the Canucks are gonna trade their 2nd best prospect and a top 6 winger on an ELC for him

Think about how much better this team would be if you simply kept Schmidt, Rathbone, and hoglander is twad if aquiring Zucker and Reilly. Like literally it would be a far better team on paper to keep all of those players, AND you would have $4 million in additional cap space

Not trading Hoglander for Rielly. Canucks say no to most of the deals, and I don't think Seattle takes holts

Let's not call people idiots for their opinion. Disagree all you want but saying that doesn't improve discussion forums in anyway.

i wouldnt trade a 3rd alone for Rielly