Hawks say yes if you switch the first to '22 and the second to '21, and Reilly agrees to an appropriate extension.

Switch out Bjorkstrand and Laine and Columbus would accept, not a chance they trade their best player who wants to be in Columbus.

Even with laine I think we say no. Marner ain’t worth that much. I’m sorry I love marner I think he’s really good and still has room to grow. No chance I move that. The only reason we trade for marner is to play with laine. That’s it. Bjorkstrand could use him but it’s not necessary. We’d be better trading for futures than moving for a playmaker while moving out our pure sniper.

Immediate no. Bjorkstrand is untouchable.

Im gonna have to disagree with you on this one. While Im not discarding the value of the trade with an extension in place, I don't think it improves us enough to warrant trading away so much.