SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Calgary Deal

Créé par: bhuntlol
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 1 juin 2021
Publié: 1 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
54 500 000 $
1900 000 $
1750 000 $
22 000 000 $
32 500 000 $
1900 000 $
23 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
22 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $81 241 783 $0 $0 $258 217 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
725 000 $725 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
G
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 juin 2021 à 19 h 25
#1
TOR V5 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 4,387
Mentions "j'aime": 1,907
Marner for Tkachuk 1 for 1 is fine
Flamecity a aimé ceci.
1 juin 2021 à 19 h 28
#2
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,435
Mentions "j'aime": 10,743
No thanks
flamesfan, Flamecity et Blow_it_up a aimé ceci.
1 juin 2021 à 19 h 32
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,925
Mentions "j'aime": 19,955
Another major overrate on Leafs players, hard pass from Flames
flamesfan, Flamecity et Blow_it_up a aimé ceci.
1 juin 2021 à 19 h 35
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 734
Mentions "j'aime": 105
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Another major overrate on Leafs players, hard pass from Flames


how? marner was literally top 5 in the league in scoring, robertson has been rated a top 15 prospect league wide. Liljegren is very similar to rasmus andersson.
1 juin 2021 à 19 h 35
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 734
Mentions "j'aime": 105
Quoting: Gmonwy
No thanks

how isnt this trade fair? its obvious tkachuk wont be back in calgary
1 juin 2021 à 19 h 37
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,925
Mentions "j'aime": 19,955
Quoting: bhuntlol
how? marner was literally top 5 in the league in scoring, robertson has been rated a top 15 prospect league wide. Liljegren is very similar to rasmus andersson.


Marner was top 5 in scoring yes, everything else you said is a complete homer take and entirely wrong
1 juin 2021 à 19 h 40
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,925
Mentions "j'aime": 19,955
Quoting: bhuntlol
how isnt this trade fair? its obvious tkachuk wont be back in calgary


Then you should 100% trade Matthews since it's obvious he is walking
Gmonwy et Ansabch12 a aimé ceci.
1 juin 2021 à 19 h 43
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 33
Mentions "j'aime": 20
pass, marner alone is worth more than 2 third liners
1 juin 2021 à 19 h 43
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 734
Mentions "j'aime": 105
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Then you should 100% trade Matthews since it's obvious he is walking


comparing matthews to tkachuk is laughable
1 juin 2021 à 19 h 44
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 734
Mentions "j'aime": 105
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Marner was top 5 in scoring yes, everything else you said is a complete homer take and entirely wrong

go look at prospect rankings league wide by credible scouts lmfao
1 juin 2021 à 19 h 44
#11
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,435
Mentions "j'aime": 10,743
Quoting: westcoastleaf
pass, marner alone is worth more than 2 third liners


WTF these are not 3rd liners you are easily trolling
Ledge_And_Dairy a aimé ceci.
1 juin 2021 à 19 h 44
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,925
Mentions "j'aime": 19,955
Quoting: bhuntlol
comparing matthews to tkachuk is laughable


Who compared them?
1 juin 2021 à 19 h 45
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 734
Mentions "j'aime": 105
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Who compared them?


calgary was a bottom feeder in a weak division, the two situations arent comparable whatsoever
1 juin 2021 à 19 h 49
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,925
Mentions "j'aime": 19,955
Quoting: bhuntlol
go look at prospect rankings league wide by credible scouts lmfao


https://thehockeywriters.com/nhl-top-100-prospects-ranking/
Robertson is 28th here, The fact that you think Liljegren and Andersson are in the same tier is laughable. I like Liljegren but is ceiling is a #3/4
1 juin 2021 à 19 h 50
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 2,088
Mentions "j'aime": 686
Flames very very very very very very very very very very very very easily decline this garbage trade
1 juin 2021 à 19 h 50
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,925
Mentions "j'aime": 19,955
Quoting: bhuntlol
calgary was a bottom feeder in a weak division, the two situations arent comparable whatsoever


How is you claiming Tkachuk wants out and me claiming Matthews wants out not comparable, it has absolutely nothing to do with player caliber? You obviously have no idea what you are talking about
1 juin 2021 à 19 h 56
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 33
Mentions "j'aime": 20
Quoting: Gmonwy
WTF these are not 3rd liners you are easily trolling


i'm not trying to troll here, but the guys that think calgary would shoot this down are clearly overrating their own players.

marner, kerfoot, three prospects AND a first-rounder for those 2? c'mon man.
1 juin 2021 à 20 h 14
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,925
Mentions "j'aime": 19,955
Quoting: westcoastleaf
i'm not trying to troll here, but the guys that think calgary would shoot this down are clearly overrating their own players.

marner, kerfoot, three prospects AND a first-rounder for those 2? c'mon man.


Tkachuk for Marner 1 for 1 is a fair trade in a vacuum, the rest of that does not add up to Lindholm
westcoastleaf et Blow_it_up a aimé ceci.
1 juin 2021 à 20 h 21
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 102
Mentions "j'aime": 41
Quoting: bhuntlol
calgary was a bottom feeder in a weak division, the two situations arent comparable whatsoever


Lol and yet here we are both not in the playoffs. I'm not gonna weigh in on the pissing match going on here but the trade doesn't make sense for the flames. Marners contract would cause headaches for the us and we don't want prospects and futures. Our core has under performed sure but we're not rebuilding but you're really only giving us 1 bona fide piece for 2 of our best forwards. Tkachuk only gets moved for a no.1 center, Lindholm should not be available at all.
Ledge_And_Dairy a aimé ceci.
1 juin 2021 à 20 h 24
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 33
Mentions "j'aime": 20
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Tkachuk for Marner 1 for 1 is a fair trade in a vacuum, the rest of that does not add up to Lindholm


i don't entirely disagree with that, but i just think there's some more playoff-desperate / gm on the hot seat / can't generate offense teams out there that would give more for a top-5 in the league scorer.
bhuntlol a aimé ceci.
1 juin 2021 à 20 h 33
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,925
Mentions "j'aime": 19,955
Quoting: westcoastleaf
i don't entirely disagree with that, but i just think there's some more playoff-desperate / gm on the hot seat / can't generate offense teams out there that would give more for a top-5 in the league scorer.


The overall scoring in the north was higher than normal since a lot of the teams had subpar d-cores. McDavid putting up Gretzky numbers is pretty evident of that. I think in a regular 82 games season vs all 31 teams that overall scoring goes down from those 4 north division players. This is not a knock on Marner, he's a hell of a player but Lindholm pretty much does everything Marner does already barring about 10-15 points (yes Marner was 20 points ahead of him this year but Flames didnt show up for half the season). Calgary also has Gaudreau who should normally make up for that points difference, this was considered a bad year for him and he still paced 70+ points. Maybe another team would have interest but not the Flames. If Calgary is going after any superstar this offseason its Eichel only
westcoastleaf a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage