SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

miracle

Créé par: sporkknife
Équipe: 2021-22 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 27 mai 2021
Publié: 27 mai 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Don't like Sutter at 3C but hopefully he comes really cheap. Hopefully we can draft a Fyodor Svechkov or a Mason McTavish in 2021 to play 3C in 2022-2023. Obviously, this is pretty much Fantasy, but this is me dreaming of Loui retiring for us all after a sad 2020-2021. I really do think Jake will end up with a terminated contract. Losing Rathbone would hurt bad but I think his skillset overlaps a lot with Quinn's. I can see the argument for moving Quinn instead of Bones. D corps would still need work after this, but that's a problem we face any way. Best case scenario, again, Beagle is done. Compared Dougie's contract to Alex P.'s. I think Sam wanting to leave and come to Van hurts Buffalo's bargaining position. I could be wrong. Maybe a 2022 first is more reasonable. I admit the trade is dubious but I wanted to keep our 9th overall this year for a future 3C. Bring the BC boys home.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
37 000 000 $
35 500 000 $
1822 500 $
1800 000 $
1853 333 $
1863 333 $
1750 000 $
1891 666 $
1750 000 $
1825 833 $
57 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
11 500 000 $
11 500 000 $
79 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
ARI
  1. Virtanen, Jake
Détails additionnels:
cancelled
2.
VAN
SEA
  1. Roussel, Antoine
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
3.
VAN
  1. Reinhart, Sam [Droits de RFA]
BUF
  1. Rathbone, Jack
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
4.
VAN
BUF
  1. Eriksson, Loui
Détails additionnels:
Lord Loui blesses everyone with his retirement (hence this is a miracle offseason). He goes to Buffalo for obvious reasons
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de VAN
Logo de WPG
Logo de VAN
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $80 313 992 $648 780 $200 000 $1 186 008 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 225 000 $1 225 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 950 000 $5 950 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
863 333 $863 333 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, C
UFA
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 mai 2021 à 19 h 14
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 1,406
Mentions "j'aime": 961
Fans would flip out trading Rathbone
remowilliams et sporkknife a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2021 à 19 h 27
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,483
Mentions "j'aime": 1,030
I think you need to add another prospect to the Sabres trade or upgrade the pick to a 1st. Rathbone looks good but Reinhart was exceptional this year.
sporkknife et drivet a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2021 à 19 h 28
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 4,292
Mentions "j'aime": 2,340
Quoting: BubbleDemko
Fans would flip out trading Rathbone


The last thing the sabres need is more LD prospects when they trade Reinhart they will hopefully get food forward prospects.
Shibbal18 a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2021 à 19 h 30
#4
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,255
Mentions "j'aime": 9,043
Quoting: BubbleDemko
Fans would flip out trading Rathbone


Dont worry sabres hard pass
CEO, SalamiCheese et sporkknife a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2021 à 19 h 31
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,525
Mentions "j'aime": 668
I like Rathbone more than Hughes. I'm not saying he's better, but I like him as a person, and he has a ceiling just as high as Hughes. I think he can be a PowerPlay quarterback. He isn't as good puck moving as Hughes, but he can shoot, he can pass. I think his defensive play might be better than Hughes as well. Reinhart is good, but if Highmore continues his play like last year, and if Podkolzin transitions well we will then have 6 top 6 winger. Miller, Boeser, Pearson, Höglander, Highmore and Podkolzin.
27 mai 2021 à 19 h 51
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 1,406
Mentions "j'aime": 961
Quoting: Shibbal18
Dont worry sabres hard pass


I know the Canucks team don't have an appetite to trade for a top 6 player. They are already happy with their top 6 . The fans on the other hand well that's a different story.
27 mai 2021 à 19 h 52
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 1,406
Mentions "j'aime": 961
Quoting: CEO
I like Rathbone more than Hughes. I'm not saying he's better, but I like him as a person, and he has a ceiling just as high as Hughes. I think he can be a PowerPlay quarterback. He isn't as good puck moving as Hughes, but he can shoot, he can pass. I think his defensive play might be better than Hughes as well. Reinhart is good, but if Highmore continues his play like last year, and if Podkolzin transitions well we will then have 6 top 6 winger. Miller, Boeser, Pearson, Höglander, Highmore and Podkolzin.


Rathbone is better at defending
27 mai 2021 à 20 h 10
#8
2018 Canucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 2,172
Mentions "j'aime": 747
Sutter at 4C be fine. Need a play driver for 3C.
3 scoring/skating lines be optimal for depth
UFA be a good addition if the right price/term.
None in the system project as a 3C.

4th line for prospects to develop in the future.

I can live with both Hughes & Bones but still the need for RHD is a big priority towards being a contender.

Trying to sign Dougie is enticing but not 7/9m worth.
Need defensive compliments for offensive LHD imo
sporkknife et BadBadgers a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2021 à 21 h 9
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,928
Mentions "j'aime": 2,670
Sabres decline
27 mai 2021 à 21 h 27
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 526
Mentions "j'aime": 210
Definitely forgot to check out what sabres have need of. I just assumed they needed some of everything ...
27 mai 2021 à 21 h 31
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 526
Mentions "j'aime": 210
Quoting: BubbleDemko
Fans would flip out trading Rathbone


I agree. I really like Rathbone. I just think the Canucks need more defensive solidity than Hughes and Bones can provide on the same team. I don't think the sabres fans know what they'd be getting in Bones, although they probably don't need LHD prospects. Hughes has proven he can be an effective player in the league and in the playoffs, Rathbone hasn't seen enough ice yet. Maybe Demko can hold it together with 40 shots against every game...
OldManRutherford a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2021 à 21 h 33
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 526
Mentions "j'aime": 210
Quoting: Nighthawk
Sutter at 4C be fine. Need a play driver for 3C.
3 scoring/skating lines be optimal for depth
UFA be a good addition if the right price/term.
None in the system project as a 3C.

4th line for prospects to develop in the future.

I can live with both Hughes & Bones but still the need for RHD is a big priority towards being a contender.

Trying to sign Dougie is enticing but not 7/9m worth.
Need defensive compliments for offensive LHD imo


Good points all. Didn't scout the market enough for a 3C
27 mai 2021 à 21 h 38
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 1,406
Mentions "j'aime": 961
Quoting: sporkknife
I agree. I really like Rathbone. I just think the Canucks need more defensive solidity than Hughes and Bones can provide on the same team. I don't think the sabres fans know what they'd be getting in Bones, although they probably don't need LHD prospects. Hughes has proven he can be an effective player in the league and in the playoffs, Rathbone hasn't seen enough ice yet. Maybe Demko can hold it together with 40 shots against every game...


I will be truthful Hughes defending in his own end scares the hell out of me. It is hard not to vomit when you see people say sign him 8x8 or some absurd numbers.
sporkknife a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2021 à 21 h 43
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 526
Mentions "j'aime": 210
Quoting: BubbleDemko
I will be truthful Hughes defending in his own end scares the hell out of me. It is hard not to vomit when you see people say sign him 8x8 or some absurd numbers.


Yeah, 8x8 for Hughes would be a big problem unfortunately. Like I understand losing puck battles due to his size but losing his assignments all the time was worrying
OldManRutherford a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage