SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Make it amazing

Créé par: smokewiseganja
Équipe: 2021-22 Jets de Winnipeg
Date de création initiale: 27 mai 2021
Publié: 27 mai 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
66 000 000 $
24 650 000 $
21 300 000 $
24 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 450 000 $
21 500 000 $
32 850 000 $
Transactions
1.
WPG
  1. Coyle, Charlie
  2. Moore, John
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
2.
WPG
  1. Barbashev, Ivan [Droits de RFA]
  2. Dunn, Vince [Droits de RFA]
  3. Kostin, Klim
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (STL)
Détails additionnels:
Pick is top 5 protected
STL
  1. Connor, Kyle
  2. Samberg, Dylan
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (CBJ)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de BOS
Logo de WPG
2022
Logo de WPG
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
2023
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2581 500 000 $75 568 456 $145 122 $1 825 000 $5 931 544 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
4 650 000 $4 650 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AG, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
725 000 $725 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
900 000 $900 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 166 667 $6 166 667 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
863 333 $863 333 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
741 667 $741 667 $ (Bonis de performance50 000 $$50K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
5 291 667 $5 291 667 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 mai 2021 à 23 h 34
#26
Démarrer sujet
Smokewise Ganja
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,281
Mentions "j'aime": 306
Quoting: HockeyFan989
LOL

ure just trying to vent.. whatever makes u feel better

nah I know we got our **** destroyed by Hellebuyck, good series

doesn’t make morrissey good lmfaoooo
28 mai 2021 à 0 h 10
#27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 7,327
Mentions "j'aime": 2,386
Quoting: smokewiseganja
I make sure to consider what everyone saying, ended up agreeing with the bruins guy. Every stat that we have access too says Morrissey is bad and it’s really that simple. It’s not hard to see on the ice either. One day you’ll understand


Lol ok. U live in that closed mind of paper stats of yours without analyzing anything like defence partners or usage. Have fun in this paper stats world of yours.
28 mai 2021 à 0 h 11
#28
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 7,327
Mentions "j'aime": 2,386
Quoting: smokewiseganja
nah I know we got our **** destroyed by Hellebuyck, good series

doesn’t make morrissey good lmfaoooo


Smith was just as good as hellebuyck. They played an equal series. The difference was the jets defence and overall play, the jets were better in that regard. The playoff experience didn’t hurt.
28 mai 2021 à 0 h 47
#29
wpg
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 2,009
Mentions "j'aime": 1,028
Quoting: smokewiseganja
nah I know we got our **** destroyed by Hellebuyck, good series

doesn’t make morrissey good lmfaoooo


Ah.. I suppose Helle also scored 4-5 goals a night

Don’t care what u think bout Morrissey, haters gotta hate
28 mai 2021 à 2 h 7
#30
Démarrer sujet
Smokewise Ganja
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,281
Mentions "j'aime": 306
Quoting: arafay
Smith was just as good as hellebuyck.


you- you did not just say that
28 mai 2021 à 2 h 9
#31
Démarrer sujet
Smokewise Ganja
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,281
Mentions "j'aime": 306
Quoting: arafay
Lol ok. U live in that closed mind of paper stats of yours without analyzing anything like defence partners or usage. Have fun in this paper stats world of yours.


If you don’t understand what the stats mean then you can’t criticize them. I’ve watched the game I won’t act like I know more than the raw data
28 mai 2021 à 7 h 13
#32
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,348
Mentions "j'aime": 11,376
Blues accept.
28 mai 2021 à 12 h 44
#33
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 7,327
Mentions "j'aime": 2,386
Quoting: smokewiseganja
you- you did not just say that


In the series he was. It was a fair battle in the crease. Both goaltenders were amazing. Maybe not just as good because Helly did win the series but still. The say helley won the series for the jets himself is false. The jets outplayed the oilers in their own way. They will never be a possession team but they kept shots to the outside and allowed hellebuyck to see pucks. That last goal of the series is a perfect example of what the jets did all series. They had great sticks in their own zone and kept stuff to the outside. Even when it seems like they were getting dominated they did not lose their d-zone structure. The oilers were outplayed, simple.
28 mai 2021 à 12 h 45
#34
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 7,327
Mentions "j'aime": 2,386
Quoting: smokewiseganja
If you don’t understand what the stats mean then you can’t criticize them. I’ve watched the game I won’t act like I know more than the raw data


I understand just as well what the stats mean and if I don’t know a player, I go off those stats, however, the eye test is much more important and simply going on hockey reference and checking corsi and fenwick doesn’t tell the whole story. It never has.
28 mai 2021 à 13 h 16
#35
Démarrer sujet
Smokewise Ganja
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,281
Mentions "j'aime": 306
Quoting: arafay
In the series he was. It was a fair battle in the crease. Both goaltenders were amazing. Maybe not just as good because Helly did win the series but still. The say helley won the series for the jets himself is false. The jets outplayed the oilers in their own way. They will never be a possession team but they kept shots to the outside and allowed hellebuyck to see pucks. That last goal of the series is a perfect example of what the jets did all series. They had great sticks in their own zone and kept stuff to the outside. Even when it seems like they were getting dominated they did not lose their d-zone structure. The oilers were outplayed, simple.


The oilers outplayed the jets by a good margin. idk what series you watched... oilers outshot them every single game lmao. It was Hellebuyck, make no mistake
28 mai 2021 à 13 h 17
#36
Démarrer sujet
Smokewise Ganja
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,281
Mentions "j'aime": 306
Quoting: arafay
I understand just as well what the stats mean and if I don’t know a player, I go off those stats, however, the eye test is much more important and simply going on hockey reference and checking corsi and fenwick doesn’t tell the whole story. It never has.


of course not, but when what I’m seeing on the ice adds up with what I’m seeing the in the spreadsheets it makes too much sense
28 mai 2021 à 14 h 43
#37
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 7,327
Mentions "j'aime": 2,386
Quoting: smokewiseganja
of course not, but when what I’m seeing on the ice adds up with what I’m seeing the in the spreadsheets it makes too much sense


Lol, if you are looking at possession and judging jets players, you are already lost. Jets don’t fit that norm cause they are a good team but are a terrible possession team. The oilers dominated possession in that series for a reason, they jets are a brutal possession team. Additionally, the players who are good possession players (ie Copp, morrissey, demelo, pionk) get the toughest matchups. The only players on the jets who are good possession player (our best in the case of ehlers) and don't get tough assignments are ehlers and stastny, and their numbers are stellar (especially in the case of ehelrs). Again I point out, it’s hard to be a good possession team when your d-core consists of morrissey, pionk, a shutdown d in demelo, and 3 3rd pairing guys.

Again, you can’t just look at those numbers. Almost all of morrissey’s minutes are against top lines while being saddled with poolman. This playoffs we saw what he can really do with a capable partner in demelo. The jets defence was simply more effective than the oilers. Yes the oilers had more shots but the jets had more blocks, and more importantly kept shots to the outside. That was the difference in the series. That and the oilers don’t have depth so all the jets d had to do was focus on mcdavid and draisaitl.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage