How many times do we have say the Canucks don't want Kerfoot

Buch is better on the RW but if Robertson can play RW I’d consider it for sure

hes better then boyd and vesey so im sure they would take kerf for the right price

3.5mil is too expensive for a 3C we aren't interested in taking his cap hit

Wings are going to pass, we aren't trading namenstinkov and we aren't retaining on multiple year contracts. Adam brooks offers 0 and the picks don't justify the trade.

If Detroit leaves Namestnikov unprotected he will be the player Seattle takes.

Yea NYR is thieving Dubas with that trade. Vancouver cannot afford Kerfoot against the cap unless they pray that Seattle picks him or they flip him in the summer. Doesn't make much sense for VAN because they cannot keep making blunder in the front office. You're also giving up too much for Namestikov and Savard.

No one wants Kerfoot or Engvall, but Leaf's fans don't seem to get that. Those 2 are involved in EVERY trade and they completely ignore that both are cap dumps that will cost assets to move, not return assets.

Just look at his comparables when it comes to points 3.5 is right around his value. He is not a cap dump and it’s not a bad contract so you don’t need to pay to get rid of him also kerfoot has value on the trade market there was interest in him over the summer