SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Overreacting to Vladars hot start

Créé par: Lets_Go_Bruins2024
Équipe: 2020-21 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 17 mars 2021
Publié: 17 mars 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
CAR
  1. Halák, Jaroslav
Détails additionnels:
After Rask comes back obviously
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2023
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $82 251 481 $964 222 $1 182 500 $-751 481 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 498 925 $1 498 925 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 675 000 $3 675 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
809 167 $809 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $ (Bonis de performance750 000 $$750K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
700 000 $700 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance100 000 $$100K)
G
RFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
894 167 $894 167 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
769 167 $769 167 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 mars 2021 à 10 h 33
#1
Shane Kelly
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 854
Mentions "j'aime": 296
I am not opposed to this, but I don't think they can move him at the deadline, cause you have to worry about injuries. I do think that they won't have to resign Halak back and Swayman and Vladar can split the back-up role after resigning Rask next season.
Lenny7 et Lets_Go_Bruins2024 a aimé ceci.
17 mars 2021 à 10 h 38
#2
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
I don't really see the point in Carolina making a move for a goalie unless it's a major upgrade. Especially since they have their own young guy in there performing extremely well (Small sample size).
17 mars 2021 à 10 h 51
#3
j_cash08
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 587
Mentions "j'aime": 169
goaltending in the playoffs has always been an issue for the Canes, make sense for them IMO
17 mars 2021 à 11 h 5
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,559
Mentions "j'aime": 5,044
Quoting: jcash08
goaltending in the playoffs has always been an issue for the Canes, make sense for them IMO


What are you smoking? Playoff goaltending is usually Carolina's strength WHEN they make it. Their major issue is always depth scoring, moving McGinn when he's scoring like he is makes no sense
17 mars 2021 à 11 h 11
#5
j_cash08
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 587
Mentions "j'aime": 169
Quoting: Caniac2000
What are you smoking? Playoff goaltending is usually Carolina's strength WHEN they make it. Their major issue is always depth scoring, moving McGinn when he's scoring like he is makes no sense


Yes Mrazek's .808 SV Percentage and getting pulled in final two games of Eastern conference final versus the Bruins is clearly a position of strength.
17 mars 2021 à 11 h 27
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,559
Mentions "j'aime": 5,044
Quoting: jcash08
Yes Mrazek's .808 SV Percentage and getting pulled in final two games of Eastern conference final versus the Bruins is clearly a position of strength.


He was injured and had a .930 going into that series 👍 Way to pick 1 series too,
17 mars 2021 à 11 h 39
#7
j_cash08
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 587
Mentions "j'aime": 169
Quoting: Caniac2000
He was injured and had a .930 going into that series 👍 Way to pick 1 series too,


If you would like to look at that playoffs as a whole he had two shut outs which inflated his numbers for the majority of the rest of his games in which he was pulled from 3, and had a sub .900 sv percentage in 5 games. It is literally a fact that Carolinas weakness is goaltending. Even in the regular season Mrazek has had above a 0.910 sv percentage and below a 2.5 GAA once in the past 5 years. He is shaky at best and does not pull through when it matters most.
17 mars 2021 à 11 h 43
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,559
Mentions "j'aime": 5,044
Quoting: jcash08
If you would like to look at that playoffs as a whole he had two shut outs which inflated his numbers for the majority of the rest of his games in which he was pulled from 3, and had a sub .900 sv percentage in 5 games. It is literally a fact that Carolinas weakness is goaltending. Even in the regular season Mrazek has had above a 0.910 sv percentage and below a 2.5 GAA once in the past 5 years. He is shaky at best and does not pull through when it matters most.


You want some stats? Okay

In the 2018-19 playoffs you sited, Mrazek has the best save percentage above expected of any goaltender in the postseason. Mrazek had 2 shutouts yes, but that does not inflate those numbers, he does have to earn them. Discounting the Boston series in which he admitted he was playing with broken bones in his hand, his save percentage was still above .930! Mrazek is streaky, but he always has turned it on for the playoffs. Carolina's goaltending is NOT their weakness, and if you knew anything about the Canes you'd know that.
17 mars 2021 à 11 h 59
#9
j_cash08
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 587
Mentions "j'aime": 169
Quoting: Caniac2000
You want some stats? Okay

In the 2018-19 playoffs you sited, Mrazek has the best save percentage above expected of any goaltender in the postseason. Mrazek had 2 shutouts yes, but that does not inflate those numbers, he does have to earn them. Discounting the Boston series in which he admitted he was playing with broken bones in his hand, his save percentage was still above .930! Mrazek is streaky, but he always has turned it on for the playoffs. Carolina's goaltending is NOT their weakness, and if you knew anything about the Canes you'd know that.


Always turns it on in the playoffs? He has won 1 playoff series in his career LOL.

The Canes issue has been goaltending for years, this has been talked about throughout the media for years, as they've also been reportedly in on every goalie that has moved in the last 3 years. Apparently you may be the only person that doesn't see this lol.
17 mars 2021 à 12 h 8
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,559
Mentions "j'aime": 5,044
Quoting: jcash08
Always turns it on in the playoffs? He has won 1 playoff series in his career LOL.

The Canes issue has been goaltending for years, this has been talked about throughout the media for years, as they've also been reportedly in on every goalie that has moved in the last 3 years. Apparently you may be the only person that doesn't see this lol.


LMAO bahahah

Carolina turned down a move for Andersen in the summer, and signed Mrazek in preference to Lehner the summer before. Goaltending has not been a problem since Francis left. You might be the only person who doesn't know that. Mrazek's saves above expected always goes through the roof in the playoffs. ALWAYS, going back to his time in Detroit
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage