SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

We Suck So Bad - Blow it Up

Créé par: Jrader17
Équipe: 2020-21 Coyotes de l'Arizona
Date de création initiale: 15 mars 2021
Publié: 16 mars 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
2750 000 $
Transactions
1.
ARI
  1. Berglund, Victor
  2. Moore, John
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
BOS
  1. Ekman-Larsson, Oliver (2 250 000 $ retained)
2.
ARI
  1. Barron, Justin [Liste de réserve]
  2. Jost, Tyson
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (COL)
3.
ARI
  1. Gustafsson, Erik
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (PHI)
4.
ARI
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (VGK)
5.
FLA
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de COL
Logo de ARI
Logo de CBJ
Logo de PHI
Logo de ARI
Logo de PIT
Logo de VGK
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
2022
Logo de ARI
Logo de BOS
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
2023
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $67 050 242 $196 951 $850 000 $14 449 758 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
7 150 000 $7 150 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 8
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
5 850 000 $5 850 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 6
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
1 533 333 $1 533 333 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
874 125 $874 125 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
6 800 000 $6 800 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
3 937 500 $3 937 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
5 275 000 $5 275 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
C
RFA
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
809 167 $809 167 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
737 500 $737 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 mars 2021 à 9 h 37
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
1...Avs don’t need kuemper and 2....that’s a massive over payment for a goalie, you will get half that value
kobeottosen19 et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
16 mars 2021 à 9 h 39
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,210
Mentions "j'aime": 465
Even though the value is fair for the OEL deal, the Bruins decline as they don't have the resources to take on his contract, even with $2.25 retained.
Jrader17 a aimé ceci.
16 mars 2021 à 9 h 41
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,594
Mentions "j'aime": 5,464
Quoting: coga16
1...Avs don’t need kuemper and 2....that’s a massive over payment for a goalie, you will get half that value


What's Barron's value?
16 mars 2021 à 9 h 46
#4
DwightSchrute
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 96
Mentions "j'aime": 12
At least you're not Buffalo's Bad so I see this as a win
Mr_Canoehead a aimé ceci.
16 mars 2021 à 10 h 1
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: bhavikp27
What's Barron's value?


hes an avs top prospect...teams moving goalies never get top prospects or 1st back, and considering Kuemper is 32 at the time of his contract is up, you arent giving up high assets to goalies to make the trade worth it, extending going into their mid 30s.

Kuemper is more a 2nd and a low-mid prospect, thats just the goalie market in general
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
16 mars 2021 à 10 h 12
#6
retired
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 8,893
Mentions "j'aime": 4,761
avs accept
Jrader17 a aimé ceci.
16 mars 2021 à 10 h 20
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,594
Mentions "j'aime": 5,464
Quoting: coga16
hes an avs top prospect...teams moving goalies never get top prospects or 1st back, and considering Kuemper is 32 at the time of his contract is up, you arent giving up high assets to goalies to make the trade worth it, extending going into their mid 30s.

Kuemper is more a 2nd and a low-mid prospect, thats just the goalie market in general


Difference is that Kuemper is a top8 G. Most available goaltenders on the "goalie market" are usually backups or 1B. There's a certain gap here. If Barron is projected to be a top4 D, it's a bit too much but I would think this is close to what ARI could get if they move Kuemper right now.
Jrader17 et DirtyDangle a aimé ceci.
16 mars 2021 à 10 h 29
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: bhavikp27
Difference is that Kuemper is a top8 G. Most available goaltenders on the "goalie market" are usually backups or 1B. There's a certain gap here. If Barron is projected to be a top4 D, it's a bit too much but I would think this is close to what ARI could get if they move Kuemper right now.


Barron is projtected as a Top 4 D talent, he was a recent fist round pick, played at WJC for Canada, lighting it up against in the Q. Hes a smooth skating puck moving Dman, easy top 4 talent.

When you look at all the stats, SV% GAA% GSAx Grubi is better than Kuemper, that is the point of all this. Why are you giving up a 1st and Barron for not even upgrading your goaltending position?
Kuemper is fine but hes not at this elite level he was last year, he is coming down to earth more this season, his numbers arent as strong
kobeottosen19 et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
16 mars 2021 à 10 h 41
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,594
Mentions "j'aime": 5,464
Quoting: coga16
Barron is projtected as a Top 4 D talent, he was a recent fist round pick, played at WJC for Canada, lighting it up against in the Q. Hes a smooth skating puck moving Dman, easy top 4 talent.

When you look at all the stats, SV% GAA% GSAx Grubi is better than Kuemper, that is the point of all this. Why are you giving up a 1st and Barron for not even upgrading your goaltending position?
Kuemper is fine but hes not at this elite level he was last year, he is coming down to earth more this season, his numbers arent as strong


Not saying Colorado should do it. It was just about Kuemper's value. Avs should add a 3rd G imo
kobeottosen19 et DirtyDangle a aimé ceci.
16 mars 2021 à 10 h 42
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: bhavikp27
Not saying Colorado should do it. It was just about Kuemper's value. Avs should add a 3G imo


Its still not as much as you would assume. Goalies never, ever, get good returns. I am not saying he is worthless, far from it, but hes not getting a 1st rounder no matter what. Goalies dont get 1sts back
GMs, kobeottosen19 et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
16 mars 2021 à 11 h 6
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 230
Mentions "j'aime": 45
Quoting: coga16
1...Avs don’t need kuemper and 2....that’s a massive over payment for a goalie, you will get half that value


I think for any Kuemper trade you need to use the Ryan Miller trade as an analog, Miller was actually 2 years older at 33 at the time but he was traded to St. Louis by Buffalo with Steve Ott for Jaroslav Halak, Chris Stewart, William Carrier, St. Louis' 1st round pick. Also Miller was a rental - Kuemper has another year at 4.5 so you're actually getting him for 2 playoff runs not just one. So if Miller fetched a young roster player in Stewart, a decent prospect at the time in Carrier (#57 overall pick) and a 1st... what would Kuemper get? Which is a long way of saying this is appropriate value for him. Also yes the Avs do need another goalie, Grubauer's stat's may look good but he's playing behind a juggernaut and the Avs of all teams should know what Kuemps can do. He's playing behind an absolute dog doo doo roster this year and is still top 6 in xGSVA.
DirtyDangle a aimé ceci.
16 mars 2021 à 11 h 10
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: Jrader17
I think for any Kuemper trade you need to use the Ryan Miller trade as an analog, Miller was actually 2 years older at 33 at the time but he was traded to St. Louis by Buffalo with Steve Ott for Jaroslav Halak, Chris Stewart, William Carrier, St. Louis' 1st round pick. Also Miller was a rental - Kuemper has another year at 4.5 so you're actually getting him for 2 playoff runs not just one. So if Miller fetched a young roster player in Stewart, a decent prospect at the time in Carrier (#57 overall pick) and a 1st... what would Kuemper get? Which is a long way of saying this is appropriate value for him. Also yes the Avs do need another goalie, Grubauer's stat's may look good but he's playing behind a juggernaut and the Avs of all teams should know what Kuemps can do. He's playing behind an absolute dog doo doo roster this year and is still top 6 in xGSVA.


A trade from 2014 does not set the market in 2021, a trade that completly blew up in the blues face and didnt work and probably a reason why teams do not pay up for goalies..especially in season trade for one

Sorry but you aren't even close to being realistic here
kobeottosen19 et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
16 mars 2021 à 13 h 10
#13
retired
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 8,893
Mentions "j'aime": 4,761
Quoting: coga16
Its still not as much as you would assume. Goalies never, ever, get good returns. I am not saying he is worthless, far from it, but hes not getting a 1st rounder no matter what. Goalies dont get 1sts back


varlamov
16 mars 2021 à 13 h 36
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: DirtyDangle
varlamov


Again you have 0 comprehension of conversations, those are not the same things....Varly was traded as a 22 year old as an RFA 10 yeras ago during the offesason. That has nothing to do about a soon to be expiring contract 31 year old goal midseason at the trade deadline

I know its tough but try to be relevant in todays Era, and not chime in with trades that are not even part of the conversation, not relatable, and area 2 CBAs ago.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
16 mars 2021 à 14 h 51
#15
retired
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 8,893
Mentions "j'aime": 4,761
Quoting: coga16
Again you have 0 comprehension of conversations, those are not the same things....Varly was traded as a 22 year old as an RFA 10 yeras ago during the offesason. That has nothing to do about a soon to be expiring contract 31 year old goal midseason at the trade deadline

I know its tough but try to be relevant in todays Era, and not chime in with trades that are not even part of the conversation, not relatable, and area 2 CBAs ago.


k. you did say never ever.

andersen
16 mars 2021 à 15 h 40
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: DirtyDangle
k. you did say never ever.

andersen


again a 26 year old RFA traded 6 years ago...thank you for proving my point of you unable to show compression of a conversation and just chime in on one thing mentioned instead of fully reading and coming up with a well thought out rebuttal

there is a reason why you get ignored
16 mars 2021 à 16 h 9
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,751
Mentions "j'aime": 4,636
Quoting: DirtyDangle
avs accept


No, they really don't.
16 mars 2021 à 17 h 17
#18
retired
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 8,893
Mentions "j'aime": 4,761
Quoting: coga16
again a 26 year old RFA traded 6 years ago...thank you for proving my point of you unable to show compression of a conversation and just chime in on one thing mentioned instead of fully reading and coming up with a well thought out rebuttal

there is a reason why you get ignored


k
16 mars 2021 à 17 h 23
#19
retired
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 8,893
Mentions "j'aime": 4,761
Quoting: TJTwolf
No, they really don't.


it's steep but i'd be willing to do it but i think kuemper is the most underrated goalie in the league. i also don't put much value on a 2021 1st since there's not much scouting being done. i like jost but i think he's replaceable. the only real loss to me barron but i'm comfortable enough with the avs defense to sacrifice a prospect.
Jrader17 a aimé ceci.
16 mars 2021 à 17 h 28
#20
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 230
Mentions "j'aime": 45
Quoting: DirtyDangle
it's steep but i'd be willing to do it but i think kuemper is the most underrated goalie in the league. i also don't put much value on a 2021 1st since there's not much scouting being done. i like jost but i think he's replaceable. the only real loss to me barron but i'm comfortable enough with the avs defense to sacrifice a prospect.


Exactly. The 1st rounder is essentially a 2nd given the Avs aims. Jost has what 4 points this year on this juggernaut team, could use a bigger role in Arizona. Also with Barron he's a good prospect but is he even one of the Avs top 4? He's behind Newhook, Byram, Timmins, and maybe Beaucage.
16 mars 2021 à 17 h 33
#21
retired
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 8,893
Mentions "j'aime": 4,761
Quoting: Jrader17
Exactly. The 1st rounder is essentially a 2nd given the Avs aims. Jost has what 4 points this year on this juggernaut team, could use a bigger role in Arizona. Also with Barron he's a good prospect but is he even one of the Avs top 4? He's behind Newhook, Byram, Timmins, and maybe Beaucage.


behind both newhook and byram for sure. i'd put him behind timmins too but i wouldn't fault anyone for putting him ahead given timmins injury history. i'd put barron ahead of beaucage and bowers and roughly on par, or maybe slightly behind kaut. he's having a very stong year in the q so i'm eager to see how that ends.
16 mars 2021 à 19 h 13
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,751
Mentions "j'aime": 4,636
Quoting: DirtyDangle
it's steep but i'd be willing to do it but i think kuemper is the most underrated goalie in the league. i also don't put much value on a 2021 1st since there's not much scouting being done. i like jost but i think he's replaceable. the only real loss to me barron but i'm comfortable enough with the avs defense to sacrifice a prospect.


Quoting: Jrader17
Exactly. The 1st rounder is essentially a 2nd given the Avs aims. Jost has what 4 points this year on this juggernaut team, could use a bigger role in Arizona. Also with Barron he's a good prospect but is he even one of the Avs top 4? He's behind Newhook, Byram, Timmins, and maybe Beaucage.


Quoting: DirtyDangle
behind both newhook and byram for sure. i'd put him behind timmins too but i wouldn't fault anyone for putting him ahead given timmins injury history. i'd put barron ahead of beaucage and bowers and roughly on par, or maybe slightly behind kaut. he's having a very stong year in the q so i'm eager to see how that ends.


Byram & Timmins can't really be considered prospects in the same manner any more, and if we do then most people seem to consider Barron's ceiling higher than Timmins' now, only Byram would be higher as a D prospect if we're still calling him that. Newhook is their top true prospect but Barron is probably not far behind. Likely a top 4 Dman. Jost has been very effective in his role this year, and then there's a first. Whatever you consider it, it's a first. So nope, not a move I'd make and thankfully I don't think it's one Sakic would make either.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage