SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Lets shake things up a bit

Créé par: Salzy
Équipe: 2020-21 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 12 mars 2021
Publié: 12 mars 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Henrique should not be moved in any sense unless we get an actual return, Eakins and Murray's horrible asset management hopefully are gone in the offseason and Henrique continues to be an impactful presence for us moving forward in our rebuild, and is a nice insurance policy should Getz not return.

Expansion draft protection moving forward: 7-3-1

Forwards: Terry, Lundestrom, Silf, Heinen, Steel, Jones, Henrique
D-men: Lindholm, Fowler, Mahura
Goalie: Gibson

Exemptions: Comtois, Zegras, Bokk

Notable exposures: Milano, Larsson, Shattenkirk

Reasonings:
Henrique over Milano - Pretty easy choice for me, Milano cant get on the ice this year and with the emergence of Comtois, Zegras, Jones there isnt really room for him here anyways, and Milano could entice Seattle to not take Shattenkirk

Mahura over Larsson/Shattenkirk - Losing Mahura would have the largest negative impact of the three imo, I believe he will continue to develop into a solid top 4 Dman and he should not be exposed at all. Larsson is a player to me that could use a change of scenery and Shattenkirk hasn't played well enough to be protected over Mahura imo, the focus of this expansion process should be on the future (Mahura) over the now (Shattenkirk)
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Bokk, Dominik
  2. Honka, Anttoni [Liste de réserve]
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (CAR)
CAR
  1. Rakell, Rickard (1 894 722 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Price is rumoured to be "High", and with 50% retention possible we should get quite a haul for a red hot Rakell.

I am very high on Honka, I think he would be a great add to our prospect pool, Bokk is a solid prospect as well but with Guys like Gunler and Jarvis CAR can afford to use him to "Outbid" teams like TOR and BOS that could also be in the Rakell market

I think Carolina is the best fit for Rakell personally
2.
ANA
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (PHI)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (PHI)
PHI
  1. Manson, Josh
Détails additionnels:
One of Manson/Shattenkirk should be traded imo.

I chose Manson because I think it would be poor practice to trade someone just months after signing a 3 year deal

Manson's value has lowered since the offseason, he cant seem to stay healthy this year, but I believe he still gets a second + from a team in need of a shutdown second pair guy.
3.
ANA
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (ARI)
ARI
  1. Deslauriers, Nicolas
Détails additionnels:
Teams always add grit, can be any team here ARI just a placeholder
4.
ANA
ARI
    Post expansion draft trade candidates:
    Jacob Larsson
    Jakob Silfverberg
    Danton Heinen
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de ANA
    2022
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ARI
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de NSH
    2023
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2081 500 000 $64 678 749 $0 $982 500 $16 821 251 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    C, AG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    820 000 $820 000 $
    AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    925 000 $925 000 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    863 333 $863 333 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    863 333 $863 333 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    750 000 $750 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
    AG, C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 3
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    750 000 $750 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
    G
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    745 000 $745 000 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
    DG/DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    950 000 $950 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
    C, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Équipe de réserve
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $ (3 425 000 $$3M3 425 000 $$3M)
    C, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    G
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    12 mars 2021 à 10 h 50
    #1
    Canes fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2021
    Messages: 4,475
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,578
    I'm a huge fan of Honka, but that retained salary on Rakell is pretty tempting.
    Salzy a aimé ceci.
    12 mars 2021 à 10 h 51
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 9,291
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,972
    The Athletic says Anaheim is looking for a hockey deal for Rakell. What does that look like?

    Foegele and Honka?
    12 mars 2021 à 10 h 57
    #3
    Hop on the Slaftrain
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 16,188
    Mentions "j'aime": 20,503
    Why wouldn't you protect Heinen over Henrique. He's a versatile forward who can slot pretty much everywhere. Henrique is probably not selected even if left exposed.
    12 mars 2021 à 11 h 5
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2018
    Messages: 5,146
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,956
    Quoting: ecupirate07
    The Athletic says Anaheim is looking for a hockey deal for Rakell. What does that look like?

    Foegele and Honka?


    I've seen so many rumoured things they want i dont know what to believe, the only constant is a "High Price"

    Quoting: SevenLeg
    Why wouldn't you protect Heinen over Henrique. He's a versatile forward who can slot pretty much everywhere. Henrique is probably not selected even if left exposed.


    I protected both, I protected henrique because there wasnt really anyone else to protect
    ecupirate07 et SevenLeg a aimé ceci.
    12 mars 2021 à 11 h 10
    #5
    Hop on the Slaftrain
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 16,188
    Mentions "j'aime": 20,503
    Quoting: Salzy
    I've seen so many rumoured things they want i dont know what to believe, the only constant is a "High Price"



    I protected both, I protected henrique because there wasnt really anyone else to protect


    My bad I confused "Post expansion draft trade candidates" with players left unprotected.
    Lenny7 et Salzy a aimé ceci.
    12 mars 2021 à 11 h 20
    #6
    Mysteryman
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2021
    Messages: 888
    Mentions "j'aime": 340
    I’d take that if i’m Canes.

    I have sneaking suspicion Rakell ends up in Boston for Debrusk in some sort of deal.
    Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
    12 mars 2021 à 11 h 21
    #7
    Lenny7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 13,291
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
    Quoting: Salzy
    I've seen so many rumoured things they want i dont know what to believe, the only constant is a "High Price"



    I protected both, I protected henrique because there wasnt really anyone else to protect


    Honestly, I'd have no problem leaving Henrique exposed. IMO, Seattle probably takes him. He's still a productive player, but shedding the cap hit allows us to use that space elsewhere. If they don't take him, it's really no sweat either, because the contract isn't ridiculously prohibitive.

    Regarding Manson, I just don't see the value in moving him. If he's healthy next year, he'll get a 2nd and 3rd if he's sold at or near the deadline anyway. The gamble in selling him now is that it's a hole you need to fill for next year. I know that sort of messes up the protection scheme, and likely leaves Mahura exposed, which could also backfire in a Theodore-esque manner. I don't friggin' know.

    With Rakell, I really think that Bokk wouldn't be the guy to target. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't see much there. I like the idea of the 1st and Honka, and if Bokk is the best you can do, sure, but I'd rather someone with a little more offensive upside.
    Salzy a aimé ceci.
    12 mars 2021 à 11 h 21
    #8
    Lenny7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 13,291
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
    Quoting: Userunknown
    I’d take that if i’m Canes.

    I have sneaking suspicion Rakell ends up in Boston for Debrusk in some sort of deal.


    I hope that doesn't happen. Debrusk isn't what the Ducks need, though GMBM has been known to pull some boneheaded moves in recent years.
    Salzy a aimé ceci.
    12 mars 2021 à 11 h 34
    #9
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2018
    Messages: 5,146
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,956
    Quoting: Lenny7
    Honestly, I'd have no problem leaving Henrique exposed. IMO, Seattle probably takes him. He's still a productive player, but shedding the cap hit allows us to use that space elsewhere. If they don't take him, it's really no sweat either, because the contract isn't ridiculously prohibitive.

    Regarding Manson, I just don't see the value in moving him. If he's healthy next year, he'll get a 2nd and 3rd if he's sold at or near the deadline anyway. The gamble in selling him now is that it's a hole you need to fill for next year. I know that sort of messes up the protection scheme, and likely leaves Mahura exposed, which could also backfire in a Theodore-esque manner. I don't friggin' know.

    With Rakell, I really think that Bokk wouldn't be the guy to target. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't see much there. I like the idea of the 1st and Honka, and if Bokk is the best you can do, sure, but I'd rather someone with a little more offensive upside.


    Losing Rico for nothing and potentially losing Getz would be horrible for us though, I protect henrique 100% of the time if theres even a 1% chance Getz doesnt come back, we need someone to fill that role.

    My whole thing was trying to get value out of both Manson and Shattenkirk, Now I could have gone about it the wrong way here but this was my first attempt of what will be many ahah, even if we have both Manson and Shattenkirk on the roster come expansion draft time, I still protect Mahura, we need to prioritize the future over the now.

    Bokk was more or less a throw-in, any prospect of similiar value would suffice in his place to me
    Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
    12 mars 2021 à 12 h 19
    #10
    Lenny7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 13,291
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
    Quoting: Salzy
    Losing Rico for nothing and potentially losing Getz would be horrible for us though, I protect henrique 100% of the time if theres even a 1% chance Getz doesnt come back, we need someone to fill that role.

    My whole thing was trying to get value out of both Manson and Shattenkirk, Now I could have gone about it the wrong way here but this was my first attempt of what will be many ahah, even if we have both Manson and Shattenkirk on the roster come expansion draft time, I still protect Mahura, we need to prioritize the future over the now.

    Bokk was more or less a throw-in, any prospect of similiar value would suffice in his place to me


    Yeah, I feel like we're basically on the same page. My assumption was Getz for 2 @ $4.5-5ish...seems like he's comfortable, and he's obviously who I'd want to keep.
    Salzy a aimé ceci.
    12 mars 2021 à 12 h 24
    #11
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2018
    Messages: 5,146
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,956
    Quoting: Lenny7
    Yeah, I feel like we're basically on the same page. My assumption was Getz for 2 $4.5-5ish...seems like he's comfortable, and he's obviously who I'd want to keep.


    100% agree
    Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
    12 mars 2021 à 13 h 46
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2021
    Messages: 12
    Mentions "j'aime": 2
    flyers accept grin
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage