SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Deadline Predictions - Anaheim

Créé par: Hockyluv21
Équipe: 2020-21 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 8 mars 2021
Publié: 8 mars 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Subban, P.K.
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2021 (ARI)
NJD
  1. Henrique, Adam
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (ANA)
2.
ANA
  1. McKeown, Roland
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (CAR)
3.
4.
ANA
  1. Virtanen, Jake
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de ANA
Logo de NYI
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de CAR
Logo de ANA
Logo de EDM
Logo de VAN
Logo de ANA
Logo de ARI
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de NSH
2023
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $73 702 777 $0 $132 500 $7 797 223 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
820 000 $820 000 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
745 000 $745 000 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Islanders de New York
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $ (3 425 000 $$3M3 425 000 $$3M)
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Islanders de New York
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 mars 2021 à 0 h 6
#1
OC Guinness Boys
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 257
Mentions "j'aime": 85
I think it’s safe to say Rakell’s now off the trade block.. for the time being anyway. It’s gotta be an offer Bob Murray can’t refuse.
Stgstg55 a aimé ceci.
9 mars 2021 à 0 h 9
#2
Isles7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 12,222
Mentions "j'aime": 5,299
No chance isles do that.
9 mars 2021 à 0 h 12
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 557
Mentions "j'aime": 111
Way too much for the isles to give up for a guy whose production has been declining over the years.
9 mars 2021 à 1 h 28
#4
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,421
Mentions "j'aime": 2,902
Quoting: Yesyesyes2020
Way too much for the isles to give up for a guy whose production has been declining over the years.


5-7-12 in his last 6 games...
Edmund0 a aimé ceci.
9 mars 2021 à 1 h 29
#5
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,421
Mentions "j'aime": 2,902
Henrique is better than Subban.
9 mars 2021 à 1 h 31
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 3,490
Mentions "j'aime": 993
Quoting: Jah1722
Henrique is better than Subban.


Only 1 season left as opposed to three, though. That's the reason to do this deal. Devils get a lower cap hit, Ducks get fewer years.
9 mars 2021 à 1 h 39
#7
MartysBetter
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 787
Mentions "j'aime": 181
I think Henrique-Subban could be part of a deal but cant see the Devils taking the entire Henrique contract without retention no matter who is going back. Devils have no cap issues now so theres no real need to get rid of that Subban contract cause its not killing them. But they are looking at having to re-sign Hughes, Blackwood, Bratt, Zacha, Severson, Smith, etc. to likely significant deals in the next few years so theres no way they want that 6 mil from Henrique on the books. Like the idea tho think maybe it could work with other picks/retention but Devils unlikely to mortgage future cap space for a little relief right now.
9 mars 2021 à 2 h 40
#8
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,421
Mentions "j'aime": 2,902
Quoting: Hockyluv21
Only 1 season left as opposed to three, though. That's the reason to do this deal. Devils get a lower cap hit, Ducks get fewer years.


Henrique isn’t bad tho. Eakins and Murray are.
9 mars 2021 à 5 h 30
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 557
Mentions "j'aime": 111
Quoting: Jah1722
5-7-12 in his last 6 games...


Six games isn’t that large of a sample size if teams made decisions based on six games they’d be in a lot of trouble
9 mars 2021 à 7 h 59
#10
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: Rusty_Bottles
I think it’s safe to say Rakell’s now off the trade block.. for the time being anyway. It’s gotta be an offer Bob Murray can’t refuse.


I disagree. The Ducks aren't making the playoffs this year, and would be a long shot next year. Trade him while his value is at it's highest.

As for everything else on here-I don't see the point in taking cap dumps from teams, to still be bad and also a cap ceiling team. I get that we're getting extra picks and assets, but I'd rather seem them spend the money on good players this offseason, or at least have the space to add when they get to that point.
9 mars 2021 à 8 h 12
#11
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: Yesyesyes2020
Six games isn’t that large of a sample size if teams made decisions based on six games they’d be in a lot of trouble


I will be the first to agree with the small sample size alert, but it's nice to see what he can do while finally playing with a couple of decent line mates.

I'm in a feisty mood this morning though, and think, if we're trading Rakell, the return should be no less than the Pageau trade.
9 mars 2021 à 8 h 35
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 2,466
Mentions "j'aime": 938
Quoting: Lenny7
I will be the first to agree with the small sample size alert, but it's nice to see what he can do while finally playing with a couple of decent line mates.

As a swede and a huge Rakell fan, I would still say that youre off here. Pageau is one of the most versatile guys in the league. One of the best PKer, faceoff, producing at a high rate on a 3rd line role. Rakell is a good shoter, sure. But not nearly as good as Pageau in all the different areas of the game. Add his decline over the past seasons (though a really incompetent offensive Anaheim team).

With that said, if we were to include a cap dump in Komarov, I think the price increases obviously.
Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
9 mars 2021 à 8 h 41
#13
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: Isles10


Sure, but Pageau also came over as a pending UFA. Rakell comes with an extra year, that I'm sure the Ducks would have no issue retaining on him to get a higher return. I see no reason why they couldn't get a 1st+good prospect, which is essentially the Pageau return (1st+2nd+3rd two years later)
9 mars 2021 à 8 h 47
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 2,466
Mentions "j'aime": 938
Quoting: Lenny7
Sure, but Pageau also came over as a pending UFA. Rakell comes with an extra year, that I'm sure the Ducks would have no issue retaining on him to get a higher return. I see no reason why they couldn't get a 1st+good prospect, which is essentially the Pageau return (1st+2nd+3rd two years later)


Actually no, it was revealed that Lou made a deal with Pageau before the deal was strucked, therefore the prize.

If Rakell was made available and there was a bidding war for him, I could see it, but in my opinion he is not at this moment.
9 mars 2021 à 8 h 55
#15
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: Isles10
Actually no, it was revealed that Lou made a deal with Pageau before the deal was strucked, therefore the prize.

If Rakell was made available and there was a bidding war for him, I could see it, but in my opinion he is not at this moment.


Honestly, if I were GMBM, unless I get an overwhelming offer for him, I'd keep him. I don't really feel like the Ducks are in a position where they should be taking on multiple years of bad contracts at this point, and I'd much rather use the space this summer to target a high profile dman and a top 6 forward, whether it be through free agency (DOUGIEEEEEEE) or trade. Lots of young guys who are starting to play decently.

If anyone is interested in Silfverberg though, I'm all ears.
Isles10 a aimé ceci.
9 mars 2021 à 8 h 59
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 2,466
Mentions "j'aime": 938
Quoting: Lenny7
Honestly, if I were GMBM, unless I get an overwhelming offer for him, I'd keep him. I don't really feel like the Ducks are in a position where they should be taking on multiple years of bad contracts at this point, and I'd much rather use the space this summer to target a high profile dman and a top 6 forward, whether it be through free agency (DOUGIEEEEEEE) or trade. Lots of young guys who are starting to play decently.

If anyone is interested in Silfverberg though, I'm all ears.


Yeah, I here you. Rakell is a good player with a great contract. Maybe the best thing would be to boost his value next year and play him with Zegras, and then maybe trade him at next years deadline. Hopefully somewhat a normal deadline with a buyers market, rather than a sellers market.
Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
9 mars 2021 à 9 h 3
#17
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: Isles10
Yeah, I here you. Rakell is a good player with a great contract. Maybe the best thing would be to boost his value next year and play him with Zegras, and then maybe trade him at next years deadline. Hopefully somewhat a normal deadline with a buyers market, rather than a sellers market.


Playing a bit with Lundestrom/Comtois right now and they're lighting it the heck up. On another note, I was surprised (and happy) that the Ducks decided to keep Zegras with the team and burn a year of his ELC though. I get that you want the extra year of cheap control, but IMO, this is the best spot for him, and I'm not a huge fan of screwing around with a players service time.
Isles10 a aimé ceci.
9 mars 2021 à 9 h 4
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 2,466
Mentions "j'aime": 938
Lenny, who is your best prospect except Zegras and Drysdale in your opinion? I dont know if Lundeström, Comtois, Terry, Jones, Steel even count as prospects anymore either.

Perreault, Tracey?
9 mars 2021 à 9 h 12
#19
NYI
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 3,504
Mentions "j'aime": 1,109
Too much from NYI. I would do Koivula, Komarov, and a 2nd for Rakell, but even then I'd rather not trade for him. He's not the guy we need.
9 mars 2021 à 11 h 36
#20
OC Guinness Boys
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 257
Mentions "j'aime": 85
🦨💨
9 mars 2021 à 11 h 38
#21
OC Guinness Boys
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 257
Mentions "j'aime": 85
Quoting: Lenny7
I disagree. The Ducks aren't making the playoffs this year, and would be a long shot next year. Trade him while his value is at it's highest.

As for everything else on here-I don't see the point in taking cap dumps from teams, to still be bad and also a cap ceiling team. I get that we're getting extra picks and assets, but I'd rather seem them spend the money on good players this offseason, or at least have the space to add when they get to that point.


Believe me, I’m all about trading Rakell when his value is highest. I was kinda speaking to the type of dude Murray is. I guarantee you he thinks the Ducks can still salvage this season.
9 mars 2021 à 13 h 26
#22
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,421
Mentions "j'aime": 2,902
Quoting: Rusty_Bottles
Believe me, I’m all about trading Rakell when his value is highest. I was kinda speaking to the type of dude Murray is. I guarantee you he thinks the Ducks can still salvage this season.


Just imagine what happens if the ducks win the next 3 vs LAK and SJS lol
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage