SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Expansion protection for MTLFAN27

Créé par: mhockey91
Équipe: 2021-22 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 3 févr. 2021
Publié: 3 févr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Assuming no trades being made

scratches are ineligible

LTIR is guys I’d leave exposed

If Bleugar has a really good season though, swap him for McCann
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 500 000 $
12 750 000 $
1750 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1481 500 000 $64 070 175 $0 $1 062 500 $17 429 825 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 940 000 $2 940 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
UFA - 4
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
733 333 $733 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 févr. 2021 à 14 h 34
#1
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,739
Mentions "j'aime": 25,562
Seems pretty clear to me.
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
3 févr. 2021 à 14 h 41
#2
MGITBPITNHL
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,507
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
why Jared McCann over Brandon Tanev? Curious
mhockey91 et jpsnow13 a aimé ceci.
3 févr. 2021 à 14 h 42
#3
MGITBPITNHL
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,507
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Ceiling potential I'm guessing?
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
3 févr. 2021 à 14 h 44
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: mhroblak
why Jared McCann over Brandon Tanev? Curious


Quoting: mhroblak
Ceiling potential I'm guessing?


Tbh I don’t think Tanev gets claimed with that contract. So I think pens are better off taking the chance he doesn’t get claimed
Masonh618 a aimé ceci.
3 févr. 2021 à 14 h 44
#5
I want Gourde back
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,567
Mentions "j'aime": 2,376
Why is Marino ineligible?
3 févr. 2021 à 14 h 44
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Seems pretty clear to me.


But of course with a new GMs and a few trades this will all be wrong tears of joy
3 févr. 2021 à 14 h 45
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: imawesome
Why is Marino ineligible?


Probably because he’s only played 2 seasons by the time of the expansion draft. Idk cap friendly lists him as ineligible on their tool so I trust their word
imawesome et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
3 févr. 2021 à 14 h 47
#8
I want Gourde back
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,567
Mentions "j'aime": 2,376
Quoting: mhockey91
Probably because he’s only played 2 seasons by the time of the expansion draft. Idk cap friendly lists him as ineligible on their tool so I trust their word


Yep you're right. My bad. I thought it said less than 2 seasons instead of 2 or less
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
3 févr. 2021 à 14 h 47
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 487
Mentions "j'aime": 74
Quoting: mhockey91
Tbh I don’t think Tanev gets claimed with that contract. So I think pens are better off taking the chance he doesn’t get claimed

No way McCann gets picked over Bluegar and Tanev. I personally take Tanev right now, he’s worth every penny.
jpsnow13 a aimé ceci.
3 févr. 2021 à 14 h 48
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 487
Mentions "j'aime": 74
Quoting: mhockey91
Probably because he’s only played 2 seasons by the time of the expansion draft. Idk cap friendly lists him as ineligible on their tool so I trust their word


Ideally, they choose between McCann/Bluegar then next year the one who doesn’t get picked is our 3C with Poulin at 3LW.
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
3 févr. 2021 à 14 h 50
#11
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,739
Mentions "j'aime": 25,562
Quoting: mhockey91
But of course with a new GMs and a few trades this will all be wrong tears of joy


I hope we're not. This is exactly my current projection for Pittsburgh.
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
3 févr. 2021 à 14 h 54
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: LRS87
No way McCann gets picked over Bluegar and Tanev. I personally take Tanev right now, he’s worth every penny.


I don’t think Tanev gets claimed regardless
Chigurrhh et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
3 févr. 2021 à 14 h 54
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: LRS87
Ideally, they choose between McCann/Bluegar then next year the one who doesn’t get picked is our 3C with Poulin at 3LW.


Yup. It’ll be between those two
Chigurrhh et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
3 févr. 2021 à 14 h 55
#14
Chiggy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,796
Mentions "j'aime": 590
Quoting: mhockey91
I don’t think Tanev gets claimed regardless


That contract isn't going to age well.
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
3 févr. 2021 à 14 h 57
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,301
Mentions "j'aime": 260
Thank you for doing this for me.
OldNYIfan et mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
3 févr. 2021 à 14 h 57
#16
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,739
Mentions "j'aime": 25,562
Quoting: mhockey91
I don’t think Tanev gets claimed regardless


And now we diverge! I'm selecting Tanev or Blueger from among the guys I've exposed. They're the kind of "glue" guys that a good team needs, and their term is a plus, too.
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
3 févr. 2021 à 15 h 10
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: OldNYIfan
And now we diverge! I'm selecting Tanev or Blueger from among the guys I've exposed. They're the kind of "glue" guys that a good team needs, and their term is a plus, too.


Interesting opinion! Don’t get me wrong Tanev has been a pleasant surprises. I was very worried at the time of the signing and I’ll gladly admit I was wrong. Still though, while he’s a good player right now, he’ll still have 4 years left after this season. Definitely some risk associated with the contract. It’s definitely possible he gets selected; but if I were Seattle I’d take Bluegar over him if he’s available
3 févr. 2021 à 15 h 11
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: MTLFAN27
Thank you for doing this for me.


What else am I gonna do while working from home haha? I need to hide my phone during the day tears of joy
MTLFAN27 a aimé ceci.
3 févr. 2021 à 15 h 21
#19
You know nothing JS
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 7,071
Mentions "j'aime": 4,450
Quoting: LRS87
No way McCann gets picked over Bluegar and Tanev. I personally take Tanev right now, he’s worth every penny.


Quoting: mhockey91
I don’t think Tanev gets claimed regardless


Quoting: OldNYIfan
And now we diverge! I'm selecting Tanev or Blueger from among the guys I've exposed. They're the kind of "glue" guys that a good team needs, and their term is a plus, too.


Tanev is my pick too. Good veteran on a good contract. Can play up and down the line up.

Like I wrote everywhere before, it's not just about getting the best player or the more potential. Seattle cant take 30 RFAs. They need to get to the cap floor and pick at least 20 players under contract in 2021. Tanev helps them to get there. There's is not a lot of thoses. Aston-Reese would be my pick otherwise if he had a new contract.
OldNYIfan et mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
3 févr. 2021 à 15 h 39
#20
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: jpsnow13
Tanev is my pick too. Good veteran on a good contract. Can play up and down the line up.

Like I wrote everywhere before, it's not just about getting the best player or the more potential. Seattle cant take 30 RFAs. They need to get to the cap floor and pick at least 20 players under contract in 2021. Tanev helps them to get there. There's is not a lot of thoses. Aston-Reese would be my pick otherwise if he had a new contract.


Fair enough!
3 févr. 2021 à 17 h 52
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 487
Mentions "j'aime": 74
Quoting: mhockey91
Fair enough!


You got remember that Tanev is currently carrying our third line. McCann hasn’t done anything that a normal 3LW can’t. Tanev has been the heart of this team and is more valuable. Plus Seattle will have more than enough cap space to take him on.
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
3 févr. 2021 à 23 h 7
#22
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: LRS87
You got remember that Tanev is currently carrying our third line. McCann hasn’t done anything that a normal 3LW can’t. Tanev has been the heart of this team and is more valuable. Plus Seattle will have more than enough cap space to take him on.


Tanev is a very under rated player. But they won't protect him.
Thing is I don't see Seattle taking him. I also don't see them selecting Blueger or ZAR.
It all really depends how Matheson plays and if a deal can be worked out.
Because
1, the Tanev contract while ok, is not the best use of their cap space.
2. ZAR is always hurt.
3. Bleuger is not a long term contract guy and he's 26. If he goes to Seattle he's going to the open market at the end of next year. It's simply best for him OR, Seattle over pays on a guy who is a 3rd -4th liner tweener center who sucks at faceoffs.

I don't think any of those options are overly appealing to seattle.
They are better off making a deal with the penguins but I'm not sure the penguins have much interest on paying an arm and a leg at this point.
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage