SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Leafs - Trade Deadline

Créé par: CeciGOAT
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 17 déc. 2020
Publié: 17 déc. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This is a trade deadline deal. Dubas likes to acquire players with term and rakell matches the criteria. Many people have been complaining about the leafs bottom 6 and I think this trade not only improved the top 6 but the movement of mikheyev down to the third line improves their depth.

I know they are over the cap. I am not sure how deadline cap space works but I think they might be able to fit this in. When it comes to value, let me know what you guys think, who needs to add.
Transactions
TOR
  1. Rakell, Rickard (1 800 000 $ retained)
ANA
  1. Hållander, Filip
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $81 037 880 $0 $0 $462 120 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
663 139 $663 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
874 125 $874 125 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
821 667 $821 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 déc. 2020 à 3 h 6
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,302
Mentions "j'aime": 3,045
Modifié 17 déc. 2020 à 3 h 27
Given the extra year on Rakell's contract, I can't imagine Anaheim would be thrilled retaining for a meager return like that. I think it more likely rather than the retention, you'd give them Holl as well. It would be to make the cap work for the Leafs and Anaheim isn't exactly overflowing with NHL RHD right now so it could work for them as well. I don't think Anaheim fans will feel this a good return for Rakell but it would at least make it work better than the retention.
Gablerino a aimé ceci.
17 déc. 2020 à 3 h 24
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2020
Messages: 15
Mentions "j'aime": 1
I think you have to pay more for Rakell, and Anaheim is not retain any Salary only for more Picks or young players. The Maple Leafs first will also not be a high pick i guess (same thought on the pick going to Car for the Marleau trade)

In general I like this trade to add more skill for the offense but we have a lot good forwards like Spezza who also want some ice time. This trade only make sense if someone gets a season-ending injury
17 déc. 2020 à 6 h 44
#3
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
I think, on top of what the previous two replies said, Hallander (I'm not saying that he's not a good prospect) isn't really someone that the Ducks need at this point. Their prospect depth down the middle is extremely heavy at this point.
Salzy a aimé ceci.
17 déc. 2020 à 8 h 29
#4
sbinalla
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2020
Messages: 1,150
Mentions "j'aime": 357
ok
17 déc. 2020 à 8 h 30
#5
sbinalla
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2020
Messages: 1,150
Mentions "j'aime": 357
your over the cap
17 déc. 2020 à 14 h 0
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 749
Mentions "j'aime": 289
Quoting: Lenny7
I think, on top of what the previous two replies said, Hallander (I'm not saying that he's not a good prospect) isn't really someone that the Ducks need at this point. Their prospect depth down the middle is extremely heavy at this point.


Ya I just put him there for a baseline. Honestly I wouldn’t mind giving up anyone except for sandin, Robertson and probably amirov (too early). You can have your pick at the rest of the system.
17 déc. 2020 à 14 h 4
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 749
Mentions "j'aime": 289
Quoting: Gablerino
I think you have to pay more for Rakell, and Anaheim is not retain any Salary only for more Picks or young players. The Maple Leafs first will also not be a high pick i guess (same thought on the pick going to Car for the Marleau trade)

In general I like this trade to add more skill for the offense but we have a lot good forwards like Spezza who also want some ice time. This trade only make sense if someone gets a season-ending injury


Ya I get that. Spezza would be sitting in this scenario, it could also be barabanov. The only thing I would say is that a injury or 2 is probably likely, and even if it’s not season ending it kind of just makes everyone compete for a spot which I don’t mind.
17 déc. 2020 à 14 h 6
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 749
Mentions "j'aime": 289
Quoting: Byrr
Given the extra year on Rakell's contract, I can't imagine Anaheim would be thrilled retaining for a meager return like that. I think it more likely rather than the retention, you'd give them Holl as well. It would be to make the cap work for the Leafs and Anaheim isn't exactly overflowing with NHL RHD right now so it could work for them as well. I don't think Anaheim fans will feel this a good return for Rakell but it would at least make it work better than the retention.


I don’t think the leafs can afford rakell without retention in the second year. Maybe they can up the return to like 1st, lily, second. That’s more than they payed for muzzin who also had a year left, but Anaheim is retaining.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage