SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Dubois for Gaudreau Monahan

Créé par: Tkachinla
Équipe: 2020-21 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 31 oct. 2020
Publié: 7 nov. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2800 000 $
37 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
24 000 000 $
Transactions
CGY
  1. Dubois, Pierre-Luc [Droits de RFA]
CBJ
  1. Gaudreau, Johnny (1 750 000 $ retained)
  2. Monahan, Sean
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de EDM
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2023
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $69 076 666 $0 $457 500 $12 423 334 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
875 000 $875 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 1
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
800 000 $800 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
7 nov. 2020 à 13 h 25
#1
Hop on the Slaftrain
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 16,195
Mentions "j'aime": 20,512
Dubois's not worth both of them
Gmonwy et Tkachinla a aimé ceci.
7 nov. 2020 à 13 h 28
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 2,231
Mentions "j'aime": 401
Quoting: SevenLeg
Dubois's not worth both of them


I agree. Just putting the base for a deal here. Prospect/pick addition from CLB to balance it. I like the resulting roster for both teams. CLB could sign Granlund, plus have Nyquist back late season and have tons of scoring depth up front, a very deep crease, and a respectable blue line.
7 nov. 2020 à 13 h 33
#3
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,785
Mentions "j'aime": 31,485
Nah this ain't it.
Gmonwy a aimé ceci.
7 nov. 2020 à 13 h 39
#4
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,446
Mentions "j'aime": 10,752
Tkachuk should be 1st line not Dube
7 nov. 2020 à 13 h 44
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 2,231
Mentions "j'aime": 401
Quoting: justaBoss
Nah this ain't it.


Which team do you dislike this most for? And do you think the trade could be tweaked to make it work?
7 nov. 2020 à 13 h 48
#6
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,785
Mentions "j'aime": 31,485
Quoting: Tkachinla
Which team do you dislike this most for? And do you think the trade could be tweaked to make it work?


Calgary. Dubois simply ain't worth that much.

Not that CBJ should move Dubois mind you.
Tkachinla a aimé ceci.
7 nov. 2020 à 13 h 53
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 2,231
Mentions "j'aime": 401
Quoting: justaBoss
Calgary. Dubois simply ain't worth that much.

Not that CBJ should move Dubois mind you.


Moving Dubois can only happen if it’s an overpay coming back that improves CLB. Landing a couple 80 point players (including Monahan, who is a much better face off center than Dubois and good for 30G every year) to take advantage of cap space is a pretty great return.

I could see CGY being interested in this deal if a prospect like Bemstrom is added by CLB. And either of Texier or Foudy instead of Bemstrom would be a great return that allows CGY to give Mangiapane and Dube more prominent top 6 roles.
7 nov. 2020 à 13 h 57
#8
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,785
Mentions "j'aime": 31,485
Quoting: Tkachinla
Moving Dubois can only happen if it’s an overpay coming back that improves CLB. Landing a couple 80 point players (including Monahan, who is a much better face off center than Dubois and good for 30G every year) to take advantage of cap space is a pretty great return.

I could see CGY being interested in this deal if a prospect like Bemstrom is added by CLB. And either of Texier or Foudy instead of Bemstrom would be a great return that allows CGY to give Mangiapane and Dube more prominent top 6 roles.


I mean it's pretty much clear that Gaudreau is leaving after two years so getting anything like Dubois in return would be absolutely ideal, but by the same token losing Monahan would hurt them as well. A bit too much I think.

Also CBJ took a risk with acquiring Panarin with only two years left, and they gained pretty much nothing from that risk as he walked. The risk with Gaudreau doing the same is fairly high. I don't think they're moving their best forward to get in yet another sticky situation - especially when there's the matter of Jones' and Werenski's extensions looming in two years time. Adding Gaudreau to the pile would be just too excessive I reckon.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage