Easier said than done. Yea might be trade some upcoming UFAs, but the returns might be picks who might not help for five years. Trading players with mid to high salaries with term...gotta take back money and there return may not be that much. For instance, would the rebuilding Canes trade a former first rounder for Sbisa?
I wouldn't let Linden has any say in hockey personnel decisions. And ownership has to bite the bullet and not allow any long term signing of UFAs....especially the type of Ericsson got.

Want to see if proposed trade or signings are good? Canucks management should post the trades on Cap Friendly to get unbiased opinion, before pulling the trigger.

I have a feeling that dallas wouldnt want the sedin twins. They have plenty of offense but they need defense and a goalie. Edler wpuld be a prime option for them.

How are the Stars gonna take on 10 million dollars in cap space for the Sedins

The Sedins are the hardest commodity in the league to trade because of their insistance on remaining together. There are so few teams that can afford them cap wise and many of those teams are not looking to add 2 expensive 36 year old forwards.

Logistically speaking, the Canucks would probably want to spread out the acquired picks over two years.

The Dallas stars are definitely not trading for the sedins especially when they have to sign seguin this year and he's going to want