My 3 would be:
-Murray
-Anderson
-Talbot

Honestly Mike Smith at 2M is worse than all of these lol someone needs to convince Holland to retire asap

Eakin-yes
Anderson-yes
Thomson-no
Edmundson-yes
Zadorov-yes
Scandella-yes
Tanev-no
Schultz-yes
Montour-yes
Murray-yes
Holtby-yes
Talbot-not by much, he's comparable to Khudobin and Greiss who got similar contracts at similar price points for similar terms lengths. If he’s overpaid, it's only by a couple hundred thousand. That's not really a issue in the grand scheme of things.

He's 1.5 (only 2 mil if he actually plays well from bonuses). But yes...contract shouldn't have happened, or should have been at 1 mil with bonuses up to 1.5 (or 2 for winning us the cup or something impossible). At least with the extra 2 mil compared to say Greiss the Oil could add another useful fwd like Kahun (hoping). But if they don't take advantage of that space...then it is pretty bad.

Holtby vs Smith

Basic stats:
SV%: 89,7 - 90,2 (Smith)
GAA: 3.11 - 2.95 (Smith)
SO: 0 - 1 (Smith)

Analytical stats:
LDSV (low shots): 26 - 69 (Smith)
MDSV (midsection shots): 55 - 2 (Holtby)
HDSV (high shots): 9 - 5 (Holtby)
Rebounds against/60: 37 - 88 (Smith)
xGA/60 (expected goals against): 37 - 72 (Smith)
GSAx (goals saved above expectations): 24 - 42 (Smith)

Smith is arguably better than Holtby and makes only half of his salary

Thing is Khudobin is about 3 times better than Talbot and got paid less. It makes no sense for the Wild to pay him that much