SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Finishing Touches

Créé par: KVS1
Équipe: 2020-21 Capitals de Washington
Date de création initiale: 11 oct. 2020
Publié: 11 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 100 000 $
23 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
WSH
  1. Virtanen, Jake [Droits de RFA]
VAN
  1. Jensen, Nick
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (WSH)
2.
WSH
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (NJD)
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de WSH
Logo de NJD
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de VGK
Logo de WSH
2022
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
2023
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $71 518 211 $419 749 $752 500 $9 981 789 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 538 462 $9 538 462 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 200 000 $9 200 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 350 000 $3 350 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 166 667 $5 166 667 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 415 000 $2 415 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Capitals de Washington
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
725 000 $725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
736 666 $736 666 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
791 667 $791 667 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG/DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 oct. 2020 à 0 h 58
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 278
Mentions "j'aime": 27
Judging on what clearing out cap space for meh players cost right now, you have to give up a pick to get rid of Panik.
Opie a aimé ceci.
11 oct. 2020 à 1 h 14
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 309
Mentions "j'aime": 60
canucks accept, virtanen for a RD is what we need
Eli a aimé ceci.
11 oct. 2020 à 1 h 22
#3
Opie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,678
Mentions "j'aime": 654
Quoting: Goldeneye
Judging on what clearing out cap space for meh players cost right now, you have to give up a pick to get rid of Panik.


True. Its not much of a realistic trade proposal.
11 oct. 2020 à 7 h 30
#4
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
Quoting: Goldeneye
Judging on what clearing out cap space for meh players cost right now, you have to give up a pick to get rid of Panik.


Based on his full season's output last year, that's correct. On the other hand, Panik started slow with some kind of injury, and got just two points in his first twenty-two games, I think? Then he finished with twenty even strength points in thirty-six games. On pace for 45 even strength points, projected to 82 games. Go back a year to when teams played 82 games, and that puts him among the top twenty right wings.

So don't sugarcoat Staal and pretend he's Panik.
11 oct. 2020 à 8 h 1
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 278
Mentions "j'aime": 27
Quoting: Eli
Panik started slow with some kind of injury, and got just two points in his first twenty-two games, I think? Then he finished with twenty even strength points in thirty-six games. On pace for 45 even strength points, projected to 82 games..


Thought no GM ever.

What in reality happens: "hmm, i think Panik could be a decent addition to our 3rd line, he's been fairly productive in the past, wouldn't cost many assets.. oh wait i can't be paying bottom 6 guys 2.75M a year for the next 3 seasons, moneys tight as is, and why the **** would i give the Caps anything they're forced to make a move to get under the cap. damn im smart"
11 oct. 2020 à 8 h 12
#6
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
Quoting: Goldeneye
Thought no GM ever.

What in reality happens: "hmm, i think Panik could be a decent addition to our 3rd line, he's been fairly productive in the past, wouldn't cost many assets.. oh wait i can't be paying bottom 6 guys 2.75M a year for the next 3 seasons, moneys tight as is, and why the **** would i give the Caps anything they're forced to make a move to get under the cap. damn im smart"


True. The 3rd might not happen this summer, but you're right about Panik being a defensively sound wing who's been productive in the past in a top-six role, and this spring showed he's ready for that again. My most recent Panik post was to trade him for a meh prospect, also to NJ, but really you're absolutely right that the only reason the Caps consider trading a guy who can play any wing spot in their middle six on a pretty good contract he just signed last year is because cap space is tight with every team, and they might be able to get even more of a steal on another UFA. If so, the return wouldn't matter much.
11 oct. 2020 à 8 h 19
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 278
Mentions "j'aime": 27
Quoting: Eli
True. The 3rd might not happen this summer, but you're right about Panik being a defensively sound wing who's been productive in the past in a top-six role, and this spring showed he's ready for that again. My most recent Panik post was to trade him for a meh prospect, also to NJ, but really you're absolutely right that the only reason the Caps consider trading a guy who can play any wing spot in their middle six on a pretty good contract he just signed last year is because cap space is tight with every team, and they might be able to get even more of a steal on another UFA. If so, the return wouldn't matter much.


Yup

I think GM's likely see him as a similar player as Namestnikov, and he only returned the Sens a 4th round pick last season. Add covid and how teams are likely to shy away from term and it gets pretty rough.

I could see a team like Buffalo make a call but i think you have to have more than one team interested if the Caps want to get something back, instead of giving him away for free, retaining or even adding a slight sweetener.
11 oct. 2020 à 8 h 32
#8
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
Quoting: Goldeneye
Yup

I think GM's likely see him as a similar player as Namestnikov, and he only returned the Sens a 4th round pick last season. Add covid and how teams are likely to shy away from term and it gets pretty rough.

I could see a team like Buffalo make a call but i think you have to have more than one team interested if the Caps want to get something back, instead of giving him away for free, retaining or even adding a slight sweetener.

I see the Caps just signed TvR so maybe Jensen is gone instead?


Yeah, I could see both Jensen and Panik being moved if they're not done signing guys.

There have been nibbles on Jensen from Toronto and Vancouver fans. There's mumbled interest in Panik from Buffalo and Ottawa. I think teams still want to see what they can get in terms of UFA superstars before making realistic depth moves.
KVS1 a aimé ceci.
12 oct. 2020 à 15 h 19
#9
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
Jensen for Virtanen means WSH could get stuck paying Virtanen up to 4.5M after arbitration, so yeah, they'd have to give Panik away for free, and teams would see that happening, and no team that would rather have Virtanen than Panik would take Panik. So they'd have to do both moves at once. And in the end, Jensen+Panik>>>>Virtanen.
12 oct. 2020 à 15 h 52
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 254
Mentions "j'aime": 28
Not sure I agree. Neither Panik or Jensen is an elite player. Virtanen may be. He is young, fast and big. I think both Jensen as a RD and Panik an analytics darling have value. I do agree both moves need to done in tandem. One doesn't work without the other.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage