SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Nucks

Créé par: leafschamp
Équipe: 2020-21 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 5 oct. 2020
Publié: 5 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 750 000 $
32 750 000 $
2850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
45 675 000 $
35 000 000 $
78 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
2.
VAN
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (OTT)
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de VAN
Logo de OTT
Logo de VAN
Logo de EDM
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de ANA
2021
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $78 476 879 $1 700 000 $3 900 000 $3 023 121 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
RFA
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 675 000 $5 675 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 6

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 oct. 2020 à 13 h 49
#1
Buffbry
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 9,257
Mentions "j'aime": 5,531
Will also cost you a 2022 1st with woo
5 oct. 2020 à 13 h 53
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,480
Mentions "j'aime": 332
Quoting: buffbry
Will also cost you a 2022 1st with woo


Nope. Cost less to get rid of MAF. He’s owed $14 million. Loui only $5m
5 oct. 2020 à 13 h 53
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 3,579
Mentions "j'aime": 1,256
OTT had a chance to claim Baert for free off waivers and didnt...

You expect us to pay a 3rd now?

You have to pay to dump cap. You can dump his 3.3M with a 2021 3rd
5 oct. 2020 à 13 h 53
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,480
Mentions "j'aime": 332
Why would you buy out Pearson. There’s asset trade value.
5 oct. 2020 à 14 h 1
#5
Buffbry
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 9,257
Mentions "j'aime": 5,531
Quoting: yztnuK
Nope. Cost less to get rid of MAF. He’s owed $14 million. Loui only $5m


And with this, you can keep him. 2 years at 6M will cost you at least a first + prospect
5 oct. 2020 à 14 h 25
#6
LIVIN ON A PRAYER
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 6,497
Mentions "j'aime": 6,470
Let's consider the Red Wings' acquisition of Staal to establish how much it's going to cost just to take Eriksson.

If the Rangers have a similar season (in the range of 95 points, finishing 15th or so), the Rangers will have to give up the 49th overall pick as part of the Staal trade.

The Rangers and Red Wings are not cash-poor teams: we need to stop looking at this specific move in terms of "real dollars in or out". The goal here is explicitly cap relief: the Rangers paid a mid-second in order to shed one year of a $5.7M hit.

Vancouver would be moving Eriksson for the same reason: the cash-dollars are not the problem, it's the fact that Eriksson's cap hit makes extending quality RFA's next season while icing a competitive roster borderline impossible.

Eriksson has two years of a $6M hit that needs to be moved: this represents 2.1x the cap hit that needs to be moved compared to Marc Staal. The math is simple then: Vancouver needs to send Detroit 2.1x the value of the 49th overall pick in the 2021 draft in order to complete the dump.

I'll use this as a reference for my values: https://bluebulletreport.com/2019/06/05/2018-19-draft-model-update-part-iii-blue-bullet-draft-pick-value-chart/

We can see here that the 49th pick in next year's draft should have a value of approximately 4.3. Given that Eriksson is 2.1x the cap hit (term), Vancouver needs to find a sum value of about 9.1 in order to shed Eriksson. This is effectively equivalent in value to the #30 pick.

Jet Woo was taken with the #37 pick and just completed his D+2 season. Given that he's had the 2 seasons of development time, let's assume he's worth 20% more than the value of the #37 pick (+10% for each development year, assuming pick value at #37 for a defenceman, not overall). This gives Woo a value of 5.9, leaving us with a value of 3.2 left to add to the deal, which has a rough equivalency to the #71 pick.

How Vancouver chooses to bridge that gap is dependent on how their season unfolds, but an early indication would suggest that the best course of action - should Vancouver make the 2021 playoffs - would be to send the 2021 Vancouver 2nd Round Pick (assume it's #50) with Woo and acquire a 2021 4th round pick in return.

Personally, I think it would serve the Canucks better to pay exclusively in picks, but if you want to make Woo one of the main pieces going back, a late 2nd or early 3rd is really all it should take to make that dump. At least according to the math.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage