SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Left side is to stacked

Créé par: Barup
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 29 sept. 2020
Publié: 29 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 250 000 $
21 500 000 $
21 000 000 $
43 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
54 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
WPG
  1. Johnsson, Andreas
  2. Rielly, Morgan
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (PIT)
2.
3.
4.
TOR
  1. Georgiev, Alexandar [Droits de RFA]
NYR
  1. Dermott, Travis
  2. Engvall, Pierre
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de VGK
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $79 546 449 $0 $400 000 $1 953 551 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
4 995 000 $4 995 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
821 667 $821 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
DD
UFA - 1
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
725 000 $725 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 sept. 2020 à 10 h 28
#1
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,598
Mentions "j'aime": 6,727
Rangers Pass.
29 sept. 2020 à 10 h 29
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2016
Messages: 916
Mentions "j'aime": 221
Dermott to the Rangers again!!
chungus a aimé ceci.
29 sept. 2020 à 10 h 32
#3
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,526
Mentions "j'aime": 22,680
Leafs give up the two best players and contracts in the Calgary trade. Lot better ways to improve the RHD than spending 8.6m on the average Hamonic and Larsson
chungus a aimé ceci.
29 sept. 2020 à 10 h 34
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 2,499
Mentions "j'aime": 2,085
left side is stacked, right side sucks - so let's trade away the whole left side and fill the right side with semi-decent players.

would you really be happy with an injury prone 32 year old, a KHL rental player, and a teenager holding down our left side?

And if Larsson is our Top RD, we have problems
hockeyconnor97 a aimé ceci.
29 sept. 2020 à 10 h 47
#5
themostleaf33
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 2,174
Mentions "j'aime": 489
Quoting: Lyle_Bubas
left side is stacked, right side sucks - so let's trade away the whole left side and fill the right side with semi-decent players.

would you really be happy with an injury prone 32 year old, a KHL rental player, and a teenager holding down our left side?

And if Larsson is our Top RD, we have problems


Isn't Lehtonen 26?
29 sept. 2020 à 10 h 50
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,125
Mentions "j'aime": 304
Why are u trading defencemen for more forwards that we dont need lol.
29 sept. 2020 à 10 h 53
#7
themostleaf33
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 2,174
Mentions "j'aime": 489
Would rather just get a couple picks for Andersen. Larsson is overrated and overpaid.

Leafs aren't trading Reilly, he is way too important to their blueline.

Calgary trade seems like a bit of an overpayment tbh.

The only trade that really makes sense here though is the Rangers one but I don't think they take it, especially if they decide to buyout Lunkvist
29 sept. 2020 à 10 h 58
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
No worries leaf fans oilers would pass and laugh at that offer
29 sept. 2020 à 11 h 3
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,838
Mentions "j'aime": 908
Rangers accept.
29 sept. 2020 à 11 h 14
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 703
Mentions "j'aime": 132
Quoting: Lyle_Bubas
left side is stacked, right side sucks - so let's trade away the whole left side and fill the right side with semi-decent players.

would you really be happy with an injury prone 32 year old, a KHL rental player, and a teenager holding down our left side?

And if Larsson is our Top RD, we have problems


You really need to reevaluate what injury-prone means. Just because a player has had an injury in their career doesn't make them injury-prone. You call to have the players on this site untradable and injury-prone because previously they had one injury.
That being said tearing apart what works to make something that doesn't completely suck is futile. They aren't destroying the Left to fix the right. That makes no sense.
29 sept. 2020 à 14 h 2
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 2,499
Mentions "j'aime": 2,085
Quoting: themostleaf33
Isn't Lehtonen 26?


Yeah, he's much older, but the way I see it, he either isn't good and he leaves, or he is good and we can't afford to pay him - so a rental, none-the-less. ofc, I hope I'm wrong, but he might play himself into too big a raise
29 sept. 2020 à 14 h 11
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 2,499
Mentions "j'aime": 2,085
Quoting: Onslaught77
You really need to reevaluate what injury-prone means. Just because a player has had an injury in their career doesn't make them injury-prone. You call to have the players on this site untradable and injury-prone because previously they had one injury.
That being said tearing apart what works to make something that doesn't completely suck is futile. They aren't destroying the Left to fix the right. That makes no sense.


Muzzin by nature is a shot blocking, physical defenceman, and he isn't getting any younger. Players like that get injured, especially with age. He won't probably play a full season for us, so leaving him as the one capable defenceman on our left side is silly.

Also, they are destroying the left to fix the right. Reilly is literally our best defenceman, by a mile and a half. He was the top offensive defenceman in the league when he was healthy 2 years ago, he drives our offence and not only that, he's on a great deal for 2 more years. Trading him so you can move in a teenager who probably needs more time in the AHL and a KHL guy who's never been to North America is risky as heck. Add in Muzzin missing 15-20 games with injury from blocking shots, hitting, fighting, etc. and our left side would be KHL guy, Sandin (20 years old, 28 GP), and Marincin or Rosen.

Our right side isn't even that good either, an overpaid Adam Larsson is an offensive black hole, nothing more than a shutdown guy who is terrible at puck-handling, and he's only got 1 year left on his deal. Hamonic is 'good', but nowhere remotely in the same dimension as Reilly, and looking at his analytics he was horrible defensively this year. Then there's liljegren, who has shown no evidence he's remotely ready to play in the NHL, let alone be an impact player. We'd be butchering our prospect's development, moving out our underpaid stud franchise defenceman to bring in an overpaid mediocre shut down guy, and a guy who is spotty defensively that hasn't played a full season since 2013.
30 sept. 2020 à 1 h 10
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 703
Mentions "j'aime": 132
Quoting: Lyle_Bubas
Muzzin by nature is a shot blocking, physical defenceman, and he isn't getting any younger. Players like that get injured, especially with age. He won't probably play a full season for us, so leaving him as the one capable defenceman on our left side is silly.

Also, they are destroying the left to fix the right. Reilly is literally our best defenceman, by a mile and a half. He was the top offensive defenceman in the league when he was healthy 2 years ago, he drives our offence and not only that, he's on a great deal for 2 more years. Trading him so you can move in a teenager who probably needs more time in the AHL and a KHL guy who's never been to North America is risky as heck. Add in Muzzin missing 15-20 games with injury from blocking shots, hitting, fighting, etc. and our left side would be KHL guy, Sandin (20 years old, 28 GP), and Marincin or Rosen.

Our right side isn't even that good either, an overpaid Adam Larsson is an offensive black hole, nothing more than a shutdown guy who is terrible at puck-handling, and he's only got 1 year left on his deal. Hamonic is 'good', but nowhere remotely in the same dimension as Reilly, and looking at his analytics he was horrible defensively this year. Then there's liljegren, who has shown no evidence he's remotely ready to play in the NHL, let alone be an impact player. We'd be butchering our prospect's development, moving out our underpaid stud franchise defenceman to bring in an overpaid mediocre shut down guy, and a guy who is spotty defensively that hasn't played a full season since 2013.


Did you even read what I wrote? I've seen tons of posts with you calling every player who's ever had an injury, injury-prone. Everything from "That being said" on was agreeing with you yet you found the need to argue with me none the less. I guess you are one of the trolls the site is trying to ban since you are looking for arguments that don't exist.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage