SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

just an idea

Créé par: nmulrich86
Équipe: 2020-21 Red Wings de Detroit
Date de création initiale: 23 sept. 2020
Publié: 23 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
what would it take for this trade, the wings have money to spend, I really think they should stay out of the big name free agent market for another year or two.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
2925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
54 950 000 $
56 100 000 $
1875 000 $
2875 000 $
2875 000 $
2975 000 $
2975 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
68 000 000 $
56 000 000 $
Transactions
DET
  1. Neal, James
  2. Puljujärvi, Jesse [Liste de réserve]
EDM
  1. Helm, Darren (1 925 000 $ retained)
  2. Perlini, Brendan [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (VGK)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de EDM
Logo de WSH
Logo de DET
Logo de SJS
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
2021
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de EDM
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
2022
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $74 223 291 $0 $1 857 500 $7 276 709 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
875 000 $875 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
975 000 $975 000 $
C, AG
UFA
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
874 125 $874 125 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
714 166 $714 166 $ (Bonis de performance157 500 $$158K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
894 166 $894 166 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
894 167 $894 167 $
DD
RFA - 4
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
UFA - 6
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
875 000 $875 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
6 083 333 $6 083 333 $
C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 sept. 2020 à 12 h 48
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,024
Mentions "j'aime": 1,017
The Wings see it as this: we’re a rebuilding team, so 3rd and 4th round picks aren’t for trade. Neal is a cap dump, and Puljujarvi isn’t enough for us to take him on. We’d need the 2020 1st that Edmonton isn’t going to trade, or more significant compensation. Just because we have the cap space doesn’t mean we need to do any teams favours, especially because there’s a line of other teams looking to dump bad contracts.
nmulrich86 et BStinson a aimé ceci.
23 sept. 2020 à 12 h 51
#2
StevieY19!!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,071
Mentions "j'aime": 690
I don't think red wings have a chance at getting Pietro unless they hand him like a 7X11 which is ridiculous I know. I know Red Wings have shown interest in Markstrom but I think he would be a mistake to sign. Also, that is a masssssive overpayment on red wings end to take on Neal's terrible contract. Red Wings don't need to spend money just because we have it. That's what screwed us with Ken Holland...
buffbry et NLidstrom a aimé ceci.
23 sept. 2020 à 12 h 53
#3
Buffbry
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,954
Mentions "j'aime": 5,369
Vegas 3rd removed and oilers add in samokurov or rodrigue to this deal.

No to Petro and no to markstrom

Mantha gets a million more most likely too
23 sept. 2020 à 13 h 8
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 34
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: AnyoneButTheBruins
I don't think red wings have a chance at getting Pietro unless they hand him like a 7X11 which is ridiculous I know. I know Red Wings have shown interest in Markstrom but I think he would be a mistake to sign. Also, that is a masssssive overpayment on red wings end to take on Neal's terrible contract. Red Wings don't need to spend money just because we have it. That's what screwed us with Ken Holland...


Yeah i could see more added for taking on neal, and i agree on staying away from big name free agents, we need to get a few more high end draft picks, the other i would do if the wings did the neal trade would be to buy neal out, or you hold him for the expansion draft the following next year.
23 sept. 2020 à 13 h 12
#5
Will9739
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 893
Mentions "j'aime": 308
Quoting: buffbry
Vegas 3rd removed and oilers add in samokurov or rodrigue to this deal.

No to Petro and no to markstrom

Mantha gets a million more most likely too

You’re correct about Mantha. It’s rumored, yes just rumored, that Yzerman is looking at trying to sign Markstrom. I’m on the same page as you on Petro. Is there any circumstance where if you were Yzerman would you trade the 4OA? Don’t freak out, it’s just a hypothetical question.
buffbry a aimé ceci.
23 sept. 2020 à 13 h 15
#6
StevieY19!!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,071
Mentions "j'aime": 690
Quoting: will9739
You’re correct about Mantha. It’s rumored, yes just rumored, that Yzerman is looking at trying to sign Markstrom. I’m on the same page as you on Petro. Is there any circumstance where if you were Yzerman would you trade the 4OA? Don’t freak out, it’s just a hypothetical question.


If he liked a player that he knew he could get later in the draft like at 5-10 then ya I could see him trading back and nabbing some extra picks/prospects with it, but I still doubt it because I think he's high on perfetti and wants him at #4
will9739 a aimé ceci.
23 sept. 2020 à 13 h 19
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 941
Mentions "j'aime": 389
Quoting: will9739
You’re correct about Mantha. It’s rumored, yes just rumored, that Yzerman is looking at trying to sign Markstrom. I’m on the same page as you on Petro. Is there any circumstance where if you were Yzerman would you trade the 4OA? Don’t freak out, it’s just a hypothetical question.


4OA for Sergachev, you probably think about it. But ultimately no. Use the pick, keep building.

I’m not opposed to spending money on goaltending, I’d be happy to have Markström. Being much stronger in net would be very beneficial to helping the team develop in front, and buy us more time to figure out a future #1 hopefully thru draft and development.
will9739 a aimé ceci.
23 sept. 2020 à 13 h 20
#8
Will9739
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 893
Mentions "j'aime": 308
Modifié 23 sept. 2020 à 13 h 26
Quoting: AnyoneButTheBruins
If he liked a player that he knew he could get later in the draft like at 5-10 then ya I could see him trading back and nabbing some extra picks/prospects with it, but I still doubt it because I think he's high on perfetti and wants him at #4


I don't think that Yzerman is going to part with the pick. Top 4 OA is a big deal. If you look at the EL Draft history the top four always have an almost immediate impact on the team that makes that pick. https://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/draft/
nmulrich86 a aimé ceci.
23 sept. 2020 à 13 h 28
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 941
Mentions "j'aime": 389
Quoting: will9739
I don't think that Yzerman is going to part with the pick. Top 4 OA is a big deal. If you look at the EL Draft history the top four always have an almost immediate impact on the team that makes that pick. https://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/draft/


If most immediate impact then hopefully they draft Marco Rossi so trend continues.
will9739 a aimé ceci.
23 sept. 2020 à 13 h 32
#10
Buffbry
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,954
Mentions "j'aime": 5,369
Quoting: will9739
You’re correct about Mantha. It’s rumored, yes just rumored, that Yzerman is looking at trying to sign Markstrom. I’m on the same page as you on Petro. Is there any circumstance where if you were Yzerman would you trade the 4OA? Don’t freak out, it’s just a hypothetical question.


It would have to be something special, I would consider it for a bunch of different scenarios. If say stutzle and byfield are both gone and we trade back to 8 with buffalo and acquire buffalo 2nd and one of Matias Samuelson or Ryan Johnson, then take askarov at 8?

If it's just straight up trading the 4th pick for something it would have to be a ridiculously overpay. Sergechev + cirelli + prospect type of deal
will9739 a aimé ceci.
23 sept. 2020 à 13 h 37
#11
Will9739
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 893
Mentions "j'aime": 308
Quoting: buffbry
It would have to be something special, I would consider it for a bunch of different scenarios. If say stutzle and byfield are both gone and we trade back to 8 with buffalo and acquire buffalo 2nd and one of Matias Samuelson or Ryan Johnson, then take askarov at 8?

If it's just straight up trading the 4th pick for something it would have to be a ridiculously overpay. Sergechev + cirelli + prospect type of deal


Off topic but did you see this: https://www.cbc.ca/sports/hockey/nhl/lawsuit-alleges-nhl-junior-leagues-working-together-to-limit-players-opportunities-1.5726142
23 sept. 2020 à 13 h 47
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 207
Mentions "j'aime": 99
Quoting: buffbry
It would have to be something special, I would consider it for a bunch of different scenarios. If say stutzle and byfield are both gone and we trade back to 8 with buffalo and acquire buffalo 2nd and one of Matias Samuelson or Ryan Johnson, then take askarov at 8?

If it's just straight up trading the 4th pick for something it would have to be a ridiculously overpay. Sergechev + cirelli + prospect type of deal


I think if we're at 4, and Byfield and Stuzle were gone, (still a pipedream OTT does something crazy at 3 to leave us one of those two), if Rossi/Raymond/Perfetti/Drysdale were still there trading back a spot or two to gain more picks would be ok. As long as we get one of the 'top rated' prospects everyone debates in that range, gain assets to move back is only a good thing.

About Mantha - I saw on the interwebs (so it has to be true), that Mantha's deal was 5-6 years, at 5.5-6M range. But Yzerman keeps his cards so tight to his chest, I don't really believe any 'rumors' out there when it comes to wings. If Yzerman gets Mantha 5-6years at under 6M, hes a genius. I really expected him at an AAV more than Larkin (6.1M), because of the premium on goal scoring.
buffbry et will9739 a aimé ceci.
23 sept. 2020 à 13 h 48
#13
Buffbry
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,954
Mentions "j'aime": 5,369


I saw it, to me just whiney babies making noise
23 sept. 2020 à 13 h 49
#14
Buffbry
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,954
Mentions "j'aime": 5,369
Quoting: HockeyNut82
I think if we're at 4, and Byfield and Stuzle were gone, (still a pipedream OTT does something crazy at 3 to leave us one of those two), if Rossi/Raymond/Perfetti/Drysdale were still there trading back a spot or two to gain more picks would be ok. As long as we get one of the 'top rated' prospects everyone debates in that range, gain assets to move back is only a good thing.

About Mantha - I saw on the interwebs (so it has to be true), that Mantha's deal was 5-6 years, at 5.5-6M range. But Yzerman keeps his cards so tight to his chest, I don't really believe any 'rumors' out there when it comes to wings. If Yzerman gets Mantha 5-6years at under 6M, hes a genius. I really expected him at an AAV more than Larkin (6.1M), because of the premium on goal scoring.


I like what your laying down here pal
23 sept. 2020 à 13 h 52
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 207
Mentions "j'aime": 99
About Puljujärvi - I remember Yzerman shipping out Drouin from TB because he was whining (was it holding out?) because it sounded like Drouin wanted more ice time or something than what he was deserving.

So I don't think Yzerman is going to bring someone like that into a team of his. He's big on "everyone works for ice time". You get what you deserve.
SweetRevenge19 et will9739 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage