SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Josh Mason

Créé par: Chigurrhh
Équipe: 2020-21 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 13 sept. 2020
Publié: 14 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Josh Manson hasn't had the best few seasons however he still caries a small positive impact on both defense and offense.

The Anaheim Ducks are supposedly the only team in the league without any analytics staff. They also gave up an actual asset to get Erik Gudbranson last year. This is the last, best chance of getting rid of Jack Johnson.

I like McCann and don't want to see him traded. But if it's going to happen, so be it. Here's a way that it could possibly help the team, especially if Poulin is ready.

Manson can likely thrive in easier minutes and the two years remaining on his contract fits what the team has with its closing window (since Letang and Malkin also only have two years left).

Leaves a bit of cap space to later figure out the 3/4C situation.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
43 500 000 $
3800 000 $
2800 000 $
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (CAR)
CAR
  1. Murray, Matt [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Reasonable to expect a 2nd and a mediocre prospect coming back from some team. Carolina is just one example.
2.
ANA
  1. Johnson, Jack (800 000 $ retained)
  2. McCann, Jared [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
  5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
First is lottery protected. General idea for the trade.

Expensive, sure, but this gets rid of Jack Johnson and gets a good defenseman.
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CAR
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de ANA
Logo de MIN
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $75 744 342 $0 $850 000 $5 755 658 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
894 167 $894 167 $
C, AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 sept. 2020 à 0 h 4
#1
Chiggy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,796
Mentions "j'aime": 590
ryKFscd.jpgxW0nKdw.jpg
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
14 sept. 2020 à 0 h 12
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 1,414
Mentions "j'aime": 389
Okay but the Ducks don’t want Johnson so.
14 sept. 2020 à 0 h 15
#3
Démarrer sujet
Chiggy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,796
Mentions "j'aime": 590
Quoting: Arlotti47
Okay but the Ducks don’t want Johnson so.


They took Gudbranson last year and wanted him in free agency two years ago. Johnson was just as bad then.
14 sept. 2020 à 0 h 18
#4
Oilers GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 1,584
Mentions "j'aime": 566
Quoting: Chigurrhh
ryKFscd.jpgxW0nKdw.jpg


what does this mean
14 sept. 2020 à 0 h 20
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 30
Mentions "j'aime": 22
Quoting: ken_holland
what does this mean


Water (blue) doesn’t mix with oil (red)?
14 sept. 2020 à 0 h 21
#6
Démarrer sujet
Chiggy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,796
Mentions "j'aime": 590
Quoting: ken_holland
what does this mean


Oversimplified,

He has a 4% positive impact on his team offensively (red areas have more shots than the average blue is the opposite.

On defense, the attacking team is -1% worse with him on the ice.
14 sept. 2020 à 0 h 21
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 1,414
Mentions "j'aime": 389
Quoting: Chigurrhh
They took Gudbranson last year and wanted him in free agency two years ago. Johnson was just as bad then.


Johnson is 10 times worse than Johnson and is a LHD
14 sept. 2020 à 0 h 25
#8
Démarrer sujet
Chiggy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,796
Mentions "j'aime": 590
Quoting: Arlotti47
Johnson is 10 times worse than Johnson and is a LHD


Not really much worse. Gudbranson is pretty bad (though he was much better in Pittsburgh). Also, we all know he sucks. But Murray, Rutherford and apparently Holland wanted him in free agency two years ago. Murray still doesn't have an analytics staff. He's big, hits and comes with salary retained. If any GM is dumb enough to do it, this is it.
14 sept. 2020 à 0 h 27
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,805
Quoting: ken_holland
what does this mean


It means a whole lot of things that ignore variables.
14 sept. 2020 à 0 h 30
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 1,414
Mentions "j'aime": 389
Quoting: Chigurrhh
Not really much worse. Gudbranson is pretty bad (though he was much better in Pittsburgh). Also, we all know he sucks. But Murray, Rutherford and apparently Holland wanted him in free agency two years ago. Murray still doesn't have an analytics staff. He's big, hits and comes with salary retained. If any GM is dumb enough to do it, this is it.


Gudbranson he’s been good with Anaheim
14 sept. 2020 à 0 h 33
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: Bf3351
It means a whole lot of things that ignore variables.


(Till it accounts for nearly everything you can probably think of and a few other things)
14 sept. 2020 à 0 h 34
#12
Démarrer sujet
Chiggy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,796
Mentions "j'aime": 590
Quoting: Arlotti47
Gudbranson he’s been good with Anaheim


More reason for them to bring in a very similar player then lol. Gudbranson's numbers in Vancouver were just as bad as Jack's.
14 sept. 2020 à 0 h 40
#13
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,805
Quoting: Dan10900
(Till it accounts for nearly everything you can probably think of and a few other things)


Nope
14 sept. 2020 à 0 h 46
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 1,414
Mentions "j'aime": 389
Quoting: Chigurrhh
More reason for them to bring in a very similar player then lol. Gudbranson's numbers in Vancouver were just as bad as Jack's.


Yes but we don’t need a LHD
14 sept. 2020 à 0 h 48
#15
Démarrer sujet
Chiggy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,796
Mentions "j'aime": 590
Quoting: Arlotti47
Yes but we don’t need a LHD


Trade one then?
14 sept. 2020 à 0 h 56
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 1,414
Mentions "j'aime": 389
Quoting: Chigurrhh
Trade one then?


We have a plethora of good young LHD. We wouldn’t trade one just so we can make room for Jack Johnson. That’s a horrible ide
14 sept. 2020 à 0 h 59
#17
Démarrer sujet
Chiggy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,796
Mentions "j'aime": 590
Quoting: Arlotti47
We have a plethora of good young LHD. We wouldn’t trade one just so we can make room for Jack Johnson. That’s a horrible ide


They clearly need a strong mentor.
BuckoJoyde a aimé ceci.
14 sept. 2020 à 1 h 3
#18
Being wrong is ok
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 703
Mentions "j'aime": 354
Quoting: Chigurrhh
They clearly need a strong mentor.


tears of joy

what?

Johnson and Mentor is the funniest thing I heard.
14 sept. 2020 à 1 h 8
#19
Démarrer sujet
Chiggy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,796
Mentions "j'aime": 590
Quoting: BuckoJoyde
tears of joy

what?

Johnson and Mentor is the funniest thing I heard.


I mean, who else is going to teach them not to let their parents control all of their money and take out expensive predatory loans to buy Ferraris and beach houses?
21 sept. 2020 à 7 h 41
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: Bf3351
Nope


Nope says the renowned analytics expert Bf3351 on CF, care to explain any of your genius ideas that can explain well documented models better than every analytics person on Twitter combined...
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage