are you high?

Keslers deal is insured so they don’t really have a reason to move it for a lesser return. And they definitely dont pay a 1st and Manson. Kerfoot, while a nice 3C doesnt do as much for the Ducks as Manson so they have no reason to do this at all

If yes, where did you buy it? Kind of looks like the good stuff

no wtf

I’ll have some of what you’re on

Wings counter with nylander for a 3rd, it's just as plausible

80% of Kesler's contract is insured. So there is a cash savings of $2.67m for the Duck in moving him.

Which again, isnt worth lessening any type of return for

hawks are not going to give up a 1st for 1 year of Freddy Anderson

Hard No from Edmonton wouldn't even happen without the 1st

Hawks laugh at that. Crawford, a better goalie by all measurements, can be signed for cheaper for 2 years (instead of 1 year for Anderson) and not cost us any picks or players to do it. Think about that

It's actually 2,670,000 reasons to move him. Not in the deal above - that's horrendous, but wouldn't be surprised if he comes into play for "cap retention" (player whose cap hit is higher than actual salary) + late draft assets this off season. For example, the third wheel in a Brandon Sutter deal out of VAN or Bozak out of STL.