SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

REBUILD!!!! Fuck The Ducks

Créé par: Kiekenapp
Équipe: 2016-17 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 8 sept. 2016
Publié: 8 sept. 2016
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
So the ducks owners/GM realized they fucked up with the Kesler Extention, and they trade the twins so they don't get fucked down the road with aged contracts with decreasing talent. Now the ducks can apply a rebuild with no long term contracts strapping them down and everyone's contact's end within 3 years, except young talent that will be good to keep long term.

Go ahead, talk shit, i am listening
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
86 000 000 $
54 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
NSH
  1. Kesler, Ryan (1 250 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2019 (ANA)
2.
ANA
  1. Sedin, Daniel
  2. Sedin, Henrik
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2017 (VAN)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2018 (VAN)
3.
4.
ANA
  1. Nylander, William
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2017 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Vatanen, Sami
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2017 (VAN)
5.
ANA
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2018 (NJD)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2017
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2018
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de VAN
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de NJD
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2019
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2373 000 000 $63 730 834 $0 $1 700 000 $9 269 166 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 2
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
3 937 500 $3 937 500 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
3 325 000 $3 325 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
UFA - 2
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 2
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 6
675 000 $675 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
600 000 $600 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
900 000 $900 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 2
900 000 $900 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
G
UFA - 3
825 000 $825 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 2
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
G
UFA - 1
863 333 $863 333 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
600 000 $600 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
Best Rebuild of All Time?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage


8 sept. 2016 à 16 h 10
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 6,921
Mentions "j'aime": 2,008
I love all tbe ducks proposals where we get Stoner for a 5th
And now we give up a prospect goalie for him
Oh thank you Ana fans

Just bc we have money does not mean we are taking your sncjors, unless they cone with a nugget
8 sept. 2016 à 16 h 11
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 93
Mentions "j'aime": 4
This is...bad.
8 sept. 2016 à 16 h 11
#3
Démarrer sujet
Kiekenapp
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 494
Mentions "j'aime": 16
Quoting: Smitty426
I love all tbe ducks proposals where we get Stoner for a 5th
And now we give up a prospect goalie for him
Oh thank you Ana fans

Just bc we have money does not mean we are taking your sncjors, unless they cone with a nugget



So you give me a 1 star? Because of that? Well **** it, ill change it to a draft pick, at least i deserve a 3 star.
8 sept. 2016 à 16 h 13
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 93
Mentions "j'aime": 4
132.gif
8 sept. 2016 à 16 h 17
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
Quoting: Ducks11
132.gif
Exactly how i feel about these proposals tight now.
8 sept. 2016 à 16 h 20
#6
Démarrer sujet
Kiekenapp
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 494
Mentions "j'aime": 16
I think its genius, good thing my name is Bob Murray, and i make all the decisions
8 sept. 2016 à 16 h 26
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 6,921
Mentions "j'aime": 2,008
Quoting: Kiekenapp
Quoting: Smitty426
I love all tbe ducks proposals where we get Stoner for a 5th
And now we give up a prospect goalie for him
Oh thank you Ana fans

Just bc we have money does not mean we are taking your sncjors, unless they cone with a nugget



So you give me a 1 star? Because of that? Well **** it, ill change it to a draft pick, at least i deserve a 3 star.


Did not realize you were counting on the stars!
Chi had to give up TT for Bickell contract and you guys are in worse shape cap wise
So I would give you 1 star you really need to know
8 sept. 2016 à 20 h 46
#8
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,192
Mentions "j'aime": 23,084
Can't imagine why Nashville would want Kesler for the next six years. No the Leafs wouldn't trade a potential star in Nylander and a top ten pick for Vatanen and a 50th pick.
9 sept. 2016 à 18 h 17
#9
Buds all day
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 475
Mentions "j'aime": 67
1. if your packaging Getz and Perry in one trade, you better be getting the world back

2. Vatanen and Nylander are fairly close, no way toronto makes that trade tho (and why is he 4th line centre
11 sept. 2016 à 13 h 14
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,863
Mentions "j'aime": 1,891
Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't the point of a rebuild to set the team up for success a few years later by aggregating young talent? All of these additions other than Nylander are at their prime now or well past it (Sedins). Instead of building for the future it seems like you're giving away high value talent for slightly younger lower value talent which likely would be gone by the time any rebuild were finished. Feels like bad asset management to me. Maybe focus more on ELCs and picks if you're thinking rebuild
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Chargement de l'animation
Soumettre les modifications du sondage