SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Blackhawks Competitive Team

Créé par: crowismydad
Équipe: 2020-21 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 12 août 2020
Publié: 12 août 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Keeps the Blackhawks competitive 20-21 without any true rebuild.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
23 750 000 $
25 000 000 $
1700 000 $
31 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
13 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $72 013 472 $1 090 244 $5 900 000 $9 486 528 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
12 août 2020 à 17 h 18
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Frankie isnt a starter, why are you hawk fans posting this same trade idea now
12 août 2020 à 17 h 20
#2
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,956
Mentions "j'aime": 5,985
I didn't comment on the first one because it was obviously a troll job. Why am I seeing it again?
12 août 2020 à 17 h 20
#3
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,584
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
Quoting: coga16
Frankie isnt a starter, why are you hawk fans posting this same trade idea now


Francouz could be a better starter than Crawford on the evidence of Chicago's last 4 games.

Avs have no reason to trade for Strome though, and Francouz at $2m as a 1B for the next two seasons is great value.
12 août 2020 à 17 h 22
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: Richard88
Francouz could be a better starter than Crawford on the evidence of Chicago's last 4 games.

Avs have no reason to trade for Strome though, and Francouz at $2m as a 1B for the next two seasons is great value.


its just a bizarre weird copy and past trade today.
Sure Frankie could be better than Crow, but he also could be the right insurance policy for Grubauer next season, so it makes 0 sense.
Richard88 a aimé ceci.
12 août 2020 à 17 h 23
#5
Démarrer sujet
Crawford Lover
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 58
Mentions "j'aime": 15
@coga, frankie could be a starter though. At this point the Hawks need a mini rebuild and taking a goalie who's proved their value as a reliable 1B could allow for a good starting role - if it doesn't work, there are plenty of .905 to .910 goalies available to pickup or trade for throughout the season. I say take a chance.
12 août 2020 à 17 h 26
#6
Démarrer sujet
Crawford Lover
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 58
Mentions "j'aime": 15
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
I didn't comment on the first one because it was obviously a troll job. Why am I seeing it again?


Why is is a troll job? What's wrong with this? The Hawks take on a 1b goalie as their 1 who's been great in an only ok defensive system. You're acting like Raanta, Grubauer, etc. weren't backups. The rest of the trades for the forward core offer a compelling roster. It also gives the Avs a desperately needed continued depth in their forward core and secondary scoring.
12 août 2020 à 17 h 26
#7
Démarrer sujet
Crawford Lover
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 58
Mentions "j'aime": 15
Quoting: Richard88
Francouz could be a better starter than Crawford on the evidence of Chicago's last 4 games.

Avs have no reason to trade for Strome though, and Francouz at $2m as a 1B for the next two seasons is great value.


Hence why giving up Strome who's desperately needed secondary scoring is a reason for them to drop their 1B.
12 août 2020 à 17 h 32
#8
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,956
Mentions "j'aime": 5,985
Quoting: crowismydad
Why is is a troll job? What's wrong with this? The Hawks take on a 1b goalie as their 1 who's been great in an only ok defensive system. You're acting like Raanta, Grubauer, etc. weren't backups. The rest of the trades for the forward core offer a compelling roster. It also gives the Avs a desperately needed continued depth in their forward core and secondary scoring.


You are literally trading a 23 year old 50-60 point center for a 30 year old backup goaltender that has benefited from a deep Colorado team. I could not think of a more shortsighted boneheaded move if I tried.

Quoting: Richard88
Francouz could be a better starter than Crawford on the evidence of Chicago's last 4 games.

Avs have no reason to trade for Strome though, and Francouz at $2m as a 1B for the next two seasons is great value.


He's not been great for us but he's had to deal with a lot of things recently. Had no conditioning/training camp prior to the EDM series. I also would find it hard to believe many goalies could have stopped what he faced in the EDM series.
12 août 2020 à 17 h 35
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: crowismydad
@coga, frankie could be a starter though. At this point the Hawks need a mini rebuild and taking a goalie who's proved their value as a reliable 1B could allow for a good starting role - if it doesn't work, there are plenty of .905 to .910 goalies available to pickup or trade for throughout the season. I say take a chance.


and why are the avs helping out the hawks here?
2 way street...avs biggest question mark is their goalie position, they arent weakening that and taking on forwards they dont have any room for already int he top 9

Hawks dont get cute here, just draft the goalie Yaroslav Askarov and move on.
Richard88 a aimé ceci.
12 août 2020 à 17 h 37
#10
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,956
Mentions "j'aime": 5,985
Just want to add that scratching Nylander and Signing Chucky is really funny because Nylander scored more points and will cost much less.
12 août 2020 à 17 h 41
#11
Démarrer sujet
Crawford Lover
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 58
Mentions "j'aime": 15
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
You are literally trading a 23 year old 50-60 point center for a 30 year old backup goaltender that has benefited from a deep Colorado team. I could not think of a more shortsighted boneheaded move if I tried.



He's not been great for us but he's had to deal with a lot of things recently. Had no conditioning/training camp prior to the EDM series. I also would find it hard to believe many goalies could have stopped what he faced in the EDM series.


Not saying he's necessarily going to be better than Crawford, but realistically the Hawks cannot afford Crawford and continue to ice a competitive roster or keep Strome. Someone has to go regardless and you're not getting around that. Francouz had a very high GSAA meaning he despite the avalanche's D not being able to collapse down and stifle the puck as much Francouz over performed. He's not a long term solution, but he's cheap and can help us until we can ice a new goalie. There's no way you can sign Strome and Kubalik. I'd pick Kubalik, and I'd rather get something for Strome, instead of just letting him go. You could ask to get Compher too, but the issue is that this is a no brainer for the avs that help keep them, and the hawks competitive.
12 août 2020 à 17 h 43
#12
Démarrer sujet
Crawford Lover
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 58
Mentions "j'aime": 15
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
Just want to add that scratching Nylander and Signing Chucky is really funny because Nylander scored more points and will cost much less.


Well this is just dumb. Chucky played almost 10 games less than Nylander, put up 2 less points, and was in a new system. Given the chance in a consistent system Chucky looks to be a 30-45 point guy, which is further than I see a guy like Nylander going.
12 août 2020 à 17 h 44
#13
Démarrer sujet
Crawford Lover
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 58
Mentions "j'aime": 15
Quoting: coga16
and why are the avs helping out the hawks here?
2 way street...avs biggest question mark is their goalie position, they arent weakening that and taking on forwards they dont have any room for already int he top 9

Hawks dont get cute here, just draft the goalie Yaroslav Askarov and move on.


If the Hawks can draft Askarov then sure - but realistically that's not going to happen. People were arguing him top 5 earlier this year. The best the Hawks are going to finish is 16th if eliminated this round. I can't imagine him still being available.
12 août 2020 à 17 h 46
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: crowismydad
If the Hawks can draft Askarov then sure - but realistically that's not going to happen. People were arguing him top 5 earlier this year. The best the Hawks are going to finish is 16th if eliminated this round. I can't imagine him still being available.


hes not top 5, he is mid 1st round now, his stock has dropped and he is right in the Hawks range. Teams right before you will be the Canes, Panthers, Oilers, and Pens, dont see any of them prioritizing a goalie over guys who can help their team now
12 août 2020 à 17 h 55
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 19
Mentions "j'aime": 8
How does askarov help the Blackhawks? By the time he develops into a starter, the championship window is closed. This year, Francouz split almost dead even with grubauer and put up .923 sv%. At his contract and the hawks cap crunch, that’s a lot more valuable and worthwhile than keeping Strome. At this point, strome is third line center behind Toews and Dach. He is not suited for a third line role, so why spend $4 million per year on that. On the avs, strome can push Kadri down to the third line, a role that he played on the maple leafs. Seems like a trade that works for both teams. Let’s not act like nylander shouldn’t be a scratch, there’s a reason that when Kane double shifts he is taking Nylander’s spot. Give me galchenyuk, who may be inconsistent, but can actually contribute to a playoff team.
crowismydad a aimé ceci.
12 août 2020 à 17 h 55
#16
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,956
Mentions "j'aime": 5,985
Quoting: crowismydad
Well this is just dumb. Chucky played almost 10 games less than Nylander, put up 2 less points, and was in a new system. Given the chance in a consistent system Chucky looks to be a 30-45 point guy, which is further than I see a guy like Nylander going.


What is dumb is that you think he is going to sign for 2million dollars, that we somehow have to lose one of Strome or Kubalik, think we should trade a young top 6 center for a goalie over the age of 30, and best of all that you think the roster you have created is somehow competitive.

Nylander is much younger, better, and cheaper than Chucky for next season. If he weren't playing below 4th line minutes, and with skilled players, he would have undoubtedly produced much more than he did.
In the 10 more games that Nylander played he had only 60 mins more time on ice.
12 août 2020 à 17 h 55
#17
Démarrer sujet
Crawford Lover
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 58
Mentions "j'aime": 15
Quoting: coga16
hes not top 5, he is mid 1st round now, his stock has dropped and he is right in the Hawks range. Teams right before you will be the Canes, Panthers, Oilers, and Pens, dont see any of them prioritizing a goalie over guys who can help their team now


I could definitely see the Canes or Sharks or Sabres or Oilers looking for a long term goalie in 3 to 4 years when he's ready. If we get him we trade strome for something else - if not I think this is a great temporary move - plus we still need a goalie short term
12 août 2020 à 17 h 58
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: crowismydad
I could definitely see the Canes or Sharks or Sabres or Oilers looking for a long term goalie in 3 to 4 years when he's ready. If we get him we trade strome for something else - if not I think this is a great temporary move - plus we still need a goalie short term


sharks dont have a pick until the 20s....Oilers and Sabres need to add players who can make impacts now to keep Eichel and McDavid happy, they cant afford to wait 3-4 years with tier superstars. Only team that that could snag him up before the Hawks is the Canes.

there is a very good chance he will be at the hawks pick. Unless Oilers do Oilers thing and do bone head picks again, you shuold have the ability to draft him
12 août 2020 à 18 h 0
#19
Démarrer sujet
Crawford Lover
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 58
Mentions "j'aime": 15
Quoting: coga16
sharks dont have a pick until the 20s....Oilers and Sabres need to add players who can make impacts now to keep Eichel and McDavid happy, they cant afford to wait 3-4 years with tier superstars. Only team that that could snag him up before the Hawks is the Canes.

there is a very good chance he will be at the hawks pick. Unless Oilers do Oilers thing and do bone head picks again, you shuold have the ability to draft him


Good point about SJS you're right about that. Being said I think a competent franchise goalie might be something McDavid and Eichel want as both have weak ass backends. Canes for sure though because they just have a loaded roster.
12 août 2020 à 18 h 3
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: crowismydad
Good point about SJS you're right about that. Being said I think a competent franchise goalie might be something McDavid and Eichel want as both have weak ass backends. Canes for sure though because they just have a loaded roster.

ct
Sabres are too high up in teh draft, there is way to much high end talent at 8 like Holtz and Perfetti to select from....they go forward for McDavid. Oilers are a wild card but they cant afford to wait on a goalie. Not when it was speculated he gave the Oilers 2 years last offseason to figure this out.....1 year down, 1 more to go
12 août 2020 à 18 h 3
#21
Démarrer sujet
Crawford Lover
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 58
Mentions "j'aime": 15
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
What is dumb is that you think he is going to sign for 2million dollars, that we somehow have to lose one of Strome or Kubalik, think we should trade a young top 6 center for a goalie over the age of 30, and best of all that you think the roster you have created is somehow competitive.

Nylander is much younger, better, and cheaper than Chucky for next season. If he weren't playing below 4th line minutes, and with skilled players, he would have undoubtedly produced much more than he did.
In the 10 more games that Nylander played he had only 60 mins more time on ice.


How do you see us signing Strome and Kubalik next year and not vacating the roster? As far as Chucky, yes because he's #1 getting older, and #2 hasn't produced as well as before. Giving him an offensive system like the Hawks and allowing him to stick around for 2 years might give him the kick in the ass he needs. 2m for his production and potential is definitely fair. This roster is just as competitive as this years. Shaw barely played, Zack Smith is an overpaid wash, Maata is slow and looked lost the entire year, and Strome had a hard time finding his game without stars around him. Being said we cannot afford to keep him and Kubalik so YMYM.

Nylander also got moved up to the top line with Toews plenty this year. He blew it every opportunity.
kuzystash a aimé ceci.
12 août 2020 à 18 h 25
#22
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,956
Mentions "j'aime": 5,985
Quoting: crowismydad
How do you see us signing Strome and Kubalik next year and not vacating the roster? As far as Chucky, yes because he's #1 getting older, and #2 hasn't produced as well as before. Giving him an offensive system like the Hawks and allowing him to stick around for 2 years might give him the kick in the ass he needs. 2m for his production and potential is definitely fair. This roster is just as competitive as this years. Shaw barely played, Zack Smith is an overpaid wash, Maata is slow and looked lost the entire year, and Strome had a hard time finding his game without stars around him. Being said we cannot afford to keep him and Kubalik so YMYM.

Nylander also got moved up to the top line with Toews plenty this year. He blew it every opportunity.


You can look at countless ACGM that have signed both Kubs and Strome if you want some idea. It's not even remotely hard to accomplish.

Actually he didn't blow any opportunities with Toews, they play completely different games and therefore aren't good linemates.

https://www.naturalstattrick.com/linestats.php?fromseason=20192020&thruseason=20192020&stype=2&sit=5v5&score=all&rate=n&team=CHI&vteam=ALL&view=wowy&loc=B&gpfilt=none&fd=2019-10-02&td=2020-04-04&tgp=2000&strict=incl&p1=8479423&p2=0&p3=8473604&p4=0&p5=0

Nylander proved he could stick in the NHL this year, and Is only going to get better as time goes on. I know you don't have any concept of time, as displayed by your trade idea and FA signings, but good young players are better than Okay veterans.
12 août 2020 à 18 h 36
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 19
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
You can look at countless ACGM that have signed both Kubs and Strome if you want some idea. It's not even remotely hard to accomplish.

Signing these guys to contracts below $4 million don’t count. If strome is really a young top 6 center like you say, then you’re looking at over $5 million. Same can be said with kubalik after potting 30 goals this year. So I don’t know how you can realistically keep both.
12 août 2020 à 18 h 38
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 19
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Actually he didn't blow any opportunities with Toews, they play completely different games and therefore aren't good linemates.

https://www.naturalstattrick.com/linestats.php?fromseason=20192020&thruseason=20192020&stype=2&sit=5v5&score=all&rate=n&team=CHI&vteam=ALL&view=wowy&loc=B&gpfilt=none&fd=2019-10-02&td=2020-04-04&tgp=2000&strict=incl&p1=8479423&p2=0&p3=8473604&p4=0&p5=0

Nylander proved he could stick in the NHL this year, and Is only going to get better as time goes on. I know you don't have any concept of time, as displayed by your trade idea and FA signings, but good young players are better than Okay veterans.[/quote]


Nylander did not show himself to be anything more than a below average scoring winger in the nhl. The kid takes up ice and that’s it. You could put a run of the mill ahler in there, and he’d produce as much as nylander.
crowismydad a aimé ceci.
12 août 2020 à 18 h 43
#25
Démarrer sujet
Crawford Lover
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 58
Mentions "j'aime": 15
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
You can look at countless ACGM that have signed both Kubs and Strome if you want some idea. It's not even remotely hard to accomplish.


Actually he didn't blow any opportunities with Toews, they play completely different games and therefore aren't good linemates.

https://www.naturalstattrick.com/linestats.php?fromseason=20192020&thruseason=20192020&stype=2&sit=5v5&score=all&rate=n&team=CHI&vteam=ALL&view=wowy&loc=B&gpfilt=none&fd=2019-10-02&td=2020-04-04&tgp=2000&strict=incl&p1=8479423&p2=0&p3=8473604&p4=0&p5=0

Nylander proved he could stick in the NHL this year, and Is only going to get better as time goes on. I know you don't have any concept of time, as displayed by your trade idea and FA signings, but good young players are better than Okay veterans.


So Nylander played ****ty with and without Toews and brought all of Toews' stats down? Sounds like a great reason why Nylander is just such a great player instead of a guy who made it to the NHL due to his last name.

I have also not seen a single thread signing Kubalik at 5m+, and Strome at 3.75m+ that can keep them both, please link to one that doesn't destroy the D. I looked through the whole first page.
kuzystash a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage