SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Panarin to Montreal

Créé par: NickC1988
Équipe: 2017-18 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 4 sept. 2016
Publié: 4 sept. 2016
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
12 750 000 $
11 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
DeBrincat, Alex
3925 000 $
13 000 000 $
12 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
CHI
    Ryan Spooner
    BOS
      Ville Pokka
      Erik Gustafsson
      3.
      CHI
        Expansion
        Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
        2018
        Logo de CHI
        Logo de CHI
        Logo de CHI
        Logo de CHI
        Logo de CHI
        Logo de CHI
        2019
        Logo de CHI
        Logo de CHI
        Logo de CHI
        Logo de CHI
        Logo de CHI
        Logo de CHI
        Logo de CHI
        2020
        Logo de CHI
        Logo de CHI
        Logo de CHI
        Logo de CHI
        Logo de CHI
        Logo de CHI
        Logo de CHI
        TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
        2275 000 000 $68 441 461 $3 558 000 $890 000 $6 558 539 $
        Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
        2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
        C, AG
        UFA - 1
        10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
        C
        NMC
        UFA - 6
        2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
        AD
        NMC
        UFA - 6
        839 166 $839 166 $
        AG, AD
        UFA - 2
        4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
        C, AG
        NMC
        UFA - 4
        5 275 000 $5 275 000 $
        AD
        NMC
        UFA - 4
        3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
        AG, C
        UFA - 3
        925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance650 000 $$650K)
        AD, C
        UFA - 2
        DeBrincat, Alex
        925 000 $925 000 $
        925 000 $925 000 $
        AG, AD
        UFA - 2
        2 775 000 $2 775 000 $
        C
        M-NTC
        UFA - 2
        863 333 $863 333 $
        C, AD
        UFA - 1
        717 500 $717 500 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
        AD, AG
        UFA - 1
        Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
        5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
        DG
        NMC
        UFA - 6
        6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
        DD
        NMC
        UFA - 7
        6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
        G
        M-NTC, NMC
        UFA - 3
        4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
        DG/DD
        M-NTC, NMC
        UFA - 2
        714 167 $714 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
        G
        UFA - 1
        1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
        DG
        UFA - 1
        2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
        DD
        UFA
        872 500 $872 500 $
        DG
        UFA - 2
        863 333 $863 333 $
        DD
        UFA - 3

        Code d'intégration

        • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
        • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

        Texte intégré

        Cliquer pour surligner
        4 sept. 2016 à 16 h 41
        #1
        exo2769
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juill. 2015
        Messages: 15,772
        Mentions "j'aime": 9,946
        Pretty good team on the ice. Wonder what F50marco thinks. He's a huge Habs fan on here. What did you do with Darling? Some people think that they're the best goalie duo in the NHL right now. You could get something for him. I'm assuming that 100% of the $1.9M is for bonuses that will be applied for next year?
        4 sept. 2016 à 19 h 5
        #2
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: mai 2015
        Messages: 115
        Mentions "j'aime": 5
        I'm usually one to tear down people's rosters, but I really, really like this one. I especially like the Spooner deal and I think both trades are a lot better and a lot more creative than most of the stuff that gets posted here.

        My biggest concern with the roster is that Ryan Spooner is going to get way more that $2,750,000 on his next contract. It would be really tough cap-wise, but I think it could be done using the framework of your moves. If Gustavsson was replaced in the Spooner trade by a prospect or pick, you could go without signing Wideman, saving at least $1M. You could also try leaving Kruger unprotected in expansion -- Las Vegas will have too many Defenseman to have need for TVR or Gustavsson, and trading Pokka would give the Blackhawks the room to protect McNeil and Hartman, making Kruger possibly the most appealing option for the expansion team, even with his Cap hit -- which could save $3M. Kruger would be tough to part with, but a passable replacement could be found on the cheap.

        Also, could you imagine an all Rusophone line in Montreal of Panarin-Galchenyuk-Radulov? Fuck, that would be so sick.
        4 sept. 2016 à 21 h 32
        #3
        Alternate universe
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: août 2016
        Messages: 27
        Mentions "j'aime": 0
        As a Habs fan I accept the trade. Lol
        5 sept. 2016 à 2 h 58
        #4
        Démarrer sujet
        Chicago
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juin 2015
        Messages: 7,002
        Mentions "j'aime": 2,852
        Quoting: JacobWallman
        I'm usually one to tear down people's rosters, but I really, really like this one. I especially like the Spooner deal and I think both trades are a lot better and a lot more creative than most of the stuff that gets posted here.

        My biggest concern with the roster is that Ryan Spooner is going to get way more that $2,750,000 on his next contract. It would be really tough cap-wise, but I think it could be done using the framework of your moves. If Gustavsson was replaced in the Spooner trade by a prospect or pick, you could go without signing Wideman, saving at least $1M. You could also try leaving Kruger unprotected in expansion -- Las Vegas will have too many Defenseman to have need for TVR or Gustavsson, and trading Pokka would give the Blackhawks the room to protect McNeil and Hartman, making Kruger possibly the most appealing option for the expansion team, even with his Cap hit -- which could save $3M. Kruger would be tough to part with, but a passable replacement could be found on the cheap.

        Also, could you imagine an all Rusophone line in Montreal of Panarin-Galchenyuk-Radulov? Fuck, that would be so sick.

        Yeah Spooner's salary is really hard to pin point considering he might regress this coming season. I think Panarin in Montreal makes so much sense. He needs a Russian teammate that knows his cultural background. Trading him is so much more than just his skill, I don't think he's as productive if he is without Russian teammates. I also agree with Kruger being unprotected I just find it hard to believe Stan would do that he obviously loves Kruger.
        5 sept. 2016 à 2 h 58
        #5
        Démarrer sujet
        Chicago
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juin 2015
        Messages: 7,002
        Mentions "j'aime": 2,852
        Quoting: Tatsiq
        As a Habs fan I accept the trade. Lol

        Deal. Price ain't going to be in his prime forever you know? Gotta try to win now.
        5 sept. 2016 à 2 h 59
        #6
        Démarrer sujet
        Chicago
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juin 2015
        Messages: 7,002
        Mentions "j'aime": 2,852
        Quoting: exo2769
        Pretty good team on the ice. Wonder what F50marco thinks. He's a huge Habs fan on here. What did you do with Darling? Some people think that they're the best goalie duo in the NHL right now. You could get something for him. I'm assuming that 100% of the $1.9M is for bonuses that will be applied for next year?

        That or a rental.
        5 sept. 2016 à 18 h 24
        #7
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: mai 2015
        Messages: 19,601
        Mentions "j'aime": 6,737
        Quoting: exo2769
        Pretty good team on the ice. Wonder what F50marco thinks. He's a huge Habs fan on here. What did you do with Darling? Some people think that they're the best goalie duo in the NHL right now. You could get something for him. I'm assuming that 100% of the $1.9M is for bonuses that will be applied for next year?


        This could work exo. Those are three prospects that aren't flashy but could be stars in the league in the future with the right development. Lehkonen is a sleeper which many here in Mtl are dying to see. I'm a little skeptical that he will be a top 6 guy in his first year as some people think but he's skilled and reminds me a little of Teravainen. Juulsen is hard to read at this point but from what I've seen, he could be a poor mans Seabrook which isn't bad. Mostly top 4 material. Funny enough his manorisms and technique remind me more of Bieksa for some reason. Fucale is the absolute question mark. Kid could be a starter in the NHL or never make it at all. I really don't know. Goalies are really hard to project. At his age and skill he should be a starter in the AHL by now and it seems like there's a high chance he's starting in the ECHL. Some notable goalies have done the same and become star players but it's generally rare. This season will be a big season for all the three players. If each on steps up a notch, then your getting a solid package. If not, well we're stealing an amazing player away for what could be nothing.

        Being as unbiased as possible, you could get a better deal somewhere else I think. With that said, I think Montreal could offer something better as well.
         
        Répondre
        To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
        Question:
        Options:
        Ajouter une option
        Soumettre le sondage