SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Lines in game 3

Créé par: Kyle_Davidson
Équipe: 2019-20 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 4 août 2020
Publié: 4 août 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Punish the young players for having a bad game, a tried and proven strategy for player development.
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2681 500 000 $60 095 019 $0 $7 797 500 $21 404 981 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
775 833 $775 833 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
880 833 $880 833 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
4 août 2020 à 2 h 16
#1
Unbiased Hawks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 373
Mentions "j'aime": 138
You aren't scratching Crawford. Obviously the Neal goal was ugly, but what are you gonna punish him for letting McJesus score??
4 août 2020 à 2 h 23
#2
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,848
Mentions "j'aime": 5,824
Quoting: Unbiased_Hawks_Fan
You aren't scratching Crawford. Obviously the Neal goal was ugly, but what are you gonna punish him for letting McJesus score??


He hasn't been sharp, obviously he won't be scratched.
4 août 2020 à 2 h 35
#3
Unbiased Hawks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 373
Mentions "j'aime": 138
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
He hasn't been sharp, obviously he won't be scratched.


No, I'm say that to you. If you think scratching Crawford is going to be the key to success, you should be fired just as much as the real Stan should be.
4 août 2020 à 4 h 48
#4
Hawks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,641
Mentions "j'aime": 1,673
Boker was awful. Crow was awful. He's given up 10 goals in 2 games. Idk what Strome was trying to do on goal #6. Dach continues to impress. Oh well...here's to pick 1, 9 or 10!
4 août 2020 à 6 h 51
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,580
Mentions "j'aime": 5,455
Get your idea but Hawks don't have the depth to keep it up; EDM will win another.
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
4 août 2020 à 8 h 57
#6
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,649
Mentions "j'aime": 9,778
I dont like this idea at all. This entire playoff is a gift from the NHL. Lets the kids play and learn. Yes, that means mistakes. We weren't supposed to be here anyway! Dont pull a Coach Q move. I liked that JC put out the 2nd PP unit "the kid unit" in the 2nd. You can't develop Boqvist as a PP specialist...if he never plays it. Id keep the lines mostly the same. Drake back in of course. MAYBE, I'd like to see Carlsson instead of DeHaan, BUT thats again just because I want him to get some ice time this series.
4 août 2020 à 10 h 59
#7
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,848
Mentions "j'aime": 5,824
Quoting: exo2769
I dont like this idea at all. This entire playoff is a gift from the NHL. Lets the kids play and learn. Yes, that means mistakes. We weren't supposed to be here anyway! Dont pull a Coach Q move. I liked that JC put out the 2nd PP unit "the kid unit" in the 2nd. You can't develop Boqvist as a PP specialist...if he never plays it. Id keep the lines mostly the same. Drake back in of course. MAYBE, I'd like to see Carlsson instead of DeHaan, BUT thats again just because I want him to get some ice time this series.


Oh, this post was 100% satire because a few fans on my original post we're over reacting to a poor game by some rookies, but making excuses for others.

Also, Carlsson in for Maatta.
exo2769 et Hawksince71 a aimé ceci.
5 août 2020 à 18 h 15
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 640
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
Oh, this post was 100% satire because a few fans on my original post we're over reacting to a poor game by some rookies, but making excuses for others.

Also, Carlsson in for Maatta.



Whether people will believe it or not, Maatta is not problem. A +3 in the playoffs. I agree. This playoff is a gift for Chicago. The team can build for the future playing the kids.
Game #2 wasn’t that bad. Both teams have to tighten up defensively. The difference I saw from game #2 was Chicago on their power plays. It was what made them victorious in game 1. They absolutely must make the Oilers pay for taking penalties.

Crow is still capable of a great game.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage