SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

habs trades next season 2

Créé par: skriko
Équipe: 2019-20 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 17 juill. 2020
Publié: 17 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Bahl, Kevin
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (VAN)
NJD
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (STL)
Détails additionnels:
cole caufield
2.
PHI
  1. Lindgren, Charlie
  2. Mete, Victor
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (MTL)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (WSH)
3.
MTL
  1. Duclair, Anthony
  2. Gruden, Jonathan
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (NYI)
OTT
  1. Hudon, Charles
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (VAN)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de MTL
Logo de ANA
Logo de WPG
Logo de MTL
Logo de FLA
Logo de MTL
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
2021
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
Logo de STL
Logo de VGK
Logo de MTL
Logo de OTT
Logo de PHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2581 500 000 $79 672 975 $0 $602 500 $1 827 025 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 083 333 $3 083 333 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
780 833 $780 833 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
815 833 $815 833 $
AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
763 333 $763 333 $ (Bonis de performance70 000 $$70K)
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
817 500 $817 500 $
DG
RFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 625 000 $4 625 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
700 000 $700 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 juill. 2020 à 11 h 23
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 3,404
Mentions "j'aime": 632
dumb move trading caufield
Campabee, RobbStark03 et BorisBagel a aimé ceci.
17 juill. 2020 à 11 h 25
#2
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 1,792
Mentions "j'aime": 231
Quoting: habsfan00
dumb move trading caufield


wrong.good moves
17 juill. 2020 à 11 h 42
#3
Speak of the Devil
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 23,940
Mentions "j'aime": 26,437
Devils accept
17 juill. 2020 à 11 h 57
#4
Boris Bagel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 2,880
Mentions "j'aime": 619
Habs pass biggly
17 juill. 2020 à 12 h 21
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 310
Mentions "j'aime": 122
mete > ghost

don't @ me
17 juill. 2020 à 15 h 2
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 278
Mentions "j'aime": 114
Quoting: SkatinTintin
mete > ghost

don't @ me


Wrong on so many levels.
17 juill. 2020 à 15 h 23
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 310
Mentions "j'aime": 122
Quoting: Brigid1011
Wrong on so many levels.


On the 176 d-men that played more than 615 minutes

expected goals against per 60 minutes: Mete is 12th (1.95), Gost is 113th (2.39)
high danger scoring chances against/60 minutes: Mete is 17th (8.87), Gost is 141th (11.77)

Gost is also an extremely sheltered d-man due to the fact that he's irresponsible with only 18.7% of his ice time against elite competition. Mete is at 29%.

One is 27 and plays like a rookie, the other is 22 and plays like a vet already. I know who I prefer, thank you.
17 juill. 2020 à 15 h 34
#8
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 1,792
Mentions "j'aime": 231
Quoting: SkatinTintin
On the 176 d-men that played more than 615 minutes

expected goals against per 60 minutes: Mete is 12th (1.95), Gost is 113th (2.39)
high danger scoring chances against/60 minutes: Mete is 17th (8.87), Gost is 141th (11.77)

Gost is also an extremely sheltered d-man due to the fact that he's irresponsible with only 18.7% of his ice time against elite competition. Mete is at 29%.

One is 27 and plays like a rookie, the other is 22 and plays like a vet already. I know who I prefer, thank you.


agreed, ratcliffe is key could trade ghost down the road
habsfan00 a aimé ceci.
17 juill. 2020 à 20 h 21
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 278
Mentions "j'aime": 114
Quoting: SkatinTintin
On the 176 d-men that played more than 615 minutes

expected goals against per 60 minutes: Mete is 12th (1.95), Gost is 113th (2.39)
high danger scoring chances against/60 minutes: Mete is 17th (8.87), Gost is 141th (11.77)

Gost is also an extremely sheltered d-man due to the fact that he's irresponsible with only 18.7% of his ice time against elite competition. Mete is at 29%.

One is 27 and plays like a rookie, the other is 22 and plays like a vet already. I know who I prefer, thank you.


So you use defensive related stats to prove your point. Level the playing field then and add offensive impact. I’ll wait.
17 juill. 2020 à 20 h 47
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 310
Mentions "j'aime": 122
Modifié 17 juill. 2020 à 20 h 54
Quoting: Brigid1011
So you use defensive related stats to prove your point. Level the playing field then and add offensive impact. I’ll wait.


on the 176 d-men that played more than 615 minutes

expected goals for per 60 minutes: Mete is 103rd (2.25), Gost is 138th (2.11)
goals for per 60 minutes: Mete is 66th (2.61), Gost is 146th (2.04)

The individual offensive stats are even funnier:

Mete had 2 more 5v5 goals than Gost
Mete had 27 more shot attempts than Gost
Mete had 12 more high danger chances than Gost
His shooting percentage is 7%, Gost is 4.4%

And all that while Gost took 7.5 more offensive zone starts per 60 minutes.

Mete doesn't play powerplay, and Gost is good on the powerplay, so you got that going for you.

Should've traded Gost when you had the chance, looks like you're stuck with him now. A team without anything at D might give a 3rd or a 4th round pick for him. edit: more like a 7th with that contract.
17 juill. 2020 à 20 h 49
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 278
Mentions "j'aime": 114
Modifié 17 juill. 2020 à 20 h 55
Quoting: SkatinTintin
on the 176 d-men that played more than 615 minutes

expected goals for per 60 minutes: Mete is 103rd (2.25), Gost is 138th (2.11)
goals for per 60 minutes: Mete is 66th (2.61), Gost is 146th (2.04)

The individual offensive stats are even funnier:

Mete had 2 more 5v5 goals than Gost
Mete had 27 more shot attempts than Gost
Mete had 12 more high danger chances than Gost
His shooting percentage is 7%, Gost is 4.4%

And all that while Gost took 7.5 more offensive zone starts per 60 minutes.

Mete doesn't play powerplay, and Gost is good on the powerplay, so you got that going for you.

Should've traded Gost when you had the chance, looks like you're stuck with him now. A team without anything at D might give a 3rd or a 4th round pick for him.



So your using one season? One that Ghost was hurt. Ghost still had one more point in 9 less games played while playing hurt.

You’re just cherry picking stats to suit your narrative and not objectively comparing the 2 players.
17 juill. 2020 à 21 h 1
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 278
Mentions "j'aime": 114
Scoring Goals Per Game Point Shares Adjusted
Player Tm Pos From To Active GP G A PTS +/- PIM EV PP SH GW S S% TOI G A PTS S OPS DPS PS G A PTS
Shayne Gostisbehere PHI D 2014 2020 6 340 51 148 199 -29 123 29 22 0 11 826 6.2 6775 0.15 0.44 0.59 2.43 17.8 12.2 30.0 56 158 214
Victor Mete MTL D 2017 2020 3 171 4 27 31 27 30 4 0 0 1 165 2.4 2841 0.02 0.16 0.18 0.96 0.1 7.9 8.1 5 30 35
17 juill. 2020 à 21 h 7
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 310
Mentions "j'aime": 122
Quoting: Brigid1011
So your using one season? One that Ghost was hurt. Ghost still had one more point in 9 less games played while playing hurt.

You’re just cherry picking stats to suit your narrative and not objectively comparing the 2 players.


Make up the excuses you want, bro. Mete's better.
18 juill. 2020 à 1 h 3
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 48
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: skriko
wrong.good moves


Caufield is a top 3 prospect in the league. I wouldnt trade him for anything
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage