SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sabres ideas

Créé par: thewookie5
Équipe: 2020-21 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 21 juin 2020
Publié: 21 juin 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 350 000 $
66 500 000 $
33 750 000 $
33 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
2950 000 $
1950 000 $
44 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 500 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Overage, Cap
11 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
BUF
  1. Henrique, Adam
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (ANA)
ANA
  1. Ristolainen, Rasmus
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (BUF)
2.
BUF
  1. Bennett, Sam
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (CGY)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
CGY
  1. Montour, Brandon [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (BUF)
3.
BUF
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (BOS)
NJD
  1. Pilut, Lawrence [Droits de RFA]
4.
BUF
  1. Zadorov, Nikita [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (COL)
COL
  1. Samuelsson, Mattias
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (ANA)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de CGY
Logo de BOS
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de DAL
2021
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de COL
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2022
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de CGY
Logo de BUF
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $75 188 750 $1 487 500 $4 337 500 $6 311 250 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
845 000 $845 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 875 000 $3 875 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance637 500 $$638K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
864 166 $864 166 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Overage, Cap
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
950 000 $950 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 juin 2020 à 14 h 43
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,440
Mentions "j'aime": 6,060
Avs accept
Richard88 a aimé ceci.
21 juin 2020 à 14 h 43
#2
retired
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 8,893
Mentions "j'aime": 4,761
avs take that. good offer for zadrov. buffalo could probably pay less.
Richard88 a aimé ceci.
21 juin 2020 à 15 h 18
#3
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,905
Mentions "j'aime": 25,716
Pilut = fifth-round pick

Montour = Bennett plus one second-round pick

Ristolainen plus 2020 second = Henrique plus 2020 fifth
CrazyFlamesFan a aimé ceci.
21 juin 2020 à 15 h 38
#4
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,584
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
Colorado says yes.

Samuelsson + 3rd would probably be enough though.

Alternatively you could simply change the 2nd to a 2021 pick, or make it Samuelsson + 2nd for Avs 4th.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
21 juin 2020 à 16 h 11
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 308
Mentions "j'aime": 89
We would probably do Montour for Bennet and a 2nd, definetly not 2 2nds.
OldNYIfan et deleted_x_213212 a aimé ceci.
21 juin 2020 à 17 h 12
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 30
Mentions "j'aime": 10
Made some changes based on some feedback.

Quoting: Richard88

Alternatively you could simply change the 2nd to a 2021 pick, or make it Samuelsson + 2nd for Avs 4th.


I used that value effectively with my updated trade. Just instead of a 2020 4th I opted for a 2021 3rd which would have similar value.


Quoting: CrazyFlamesFan
We would probably do Montour for Bennet and a 2nd, definetly not 2 2nds.


Alright, that's fair; someone else had made a Risto trade with Poolman, Bennett and 2 2nds and I thought that seemed rather absurd so I had dropped the extra prospect initially. Now I made it Bennett, 2020 2nd and a 2022 4th which is akin to a 6th in 2020. Granted the latter pick could be made conditional by some means.

Quoting: OldNYIfan

Pilut = fifth-round pick

Ristolainen plus 2020 second = Henrique plus 2020 fifth


Pilut's rights are at least worth a 4th, 3rds and 4th are the most typically dealt picks for RFA rights. Another idea would be to make it a 2021 4th that becomes a 2021 3rd if he signs in the NHL.

Risto's value should be higher than Henriques not vice-versa. Henrique is 30 and under contract for 4 more years at just shy of 6mil. While Henrique could potentially be well worth his contract the next 4 years he could also implode. The Sabres take the far larger risk hence my offer stands as he could easily turn into a cap dump within a year.
21 juin 2020 à 17 h 15
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 513
Mentions "j'aime": 216
On board with the Risto and Montour deals. Should be trying like hell to convinve Pilut to come back with a guaranteed NHL spot now that Botterill's gone, not trading him for scraps. Don't really need Zadorov then which is more than I'd be willing to pay.
21 juin 2020 à 17 h 31
#8
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,905
Mentions "j'aime": 25,716
Quoting: thewookie5
Pilut's rights are at least worth a 4th, 3rds and 4th are the most typically dealt picks for RFA rights. Another idea would be to make it a 2021 4th that becomes a 2021 3rd if he signs in the NHL.

Risto's value should be higher than Henriques not vice-versa. Henrique is 30 and under contract for 4 more years at just shy of 6mil. While Henrique could potentially be well worth his contract the next 4 years he could also implode. The Sabres take the far larger risk hence my offer stands as he could easily turn into a cap dump within a year.


Whether or not RFA rights are commonly worth a third or fourth doesn't apply to guys who already have signed a contract in the KHL. And the idea that a fourth is a throw-away (as implied by the elevation to a third if it turns out to be worth anything) is just not rational.

You have Henrique as your #2 C. That's by definition worth more than Ristolainen, whatever the risk that he starts declining in 2, 3 or 4 years. If they were playing the same position, your argument would have merit. Because they're not, it doesn't.
21 juin 2020 à 17 h 43
#9
Sabres are elite
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 7,995
Mentions "j'aime": 3,305
That's a really bad Colorado trade. Samuelsson is already everything Zadorov is but better. He can actually skate unlike Z and he can get offense also unlike Z
21 juin 2020 à 18 h 59
#10
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,584
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
Quoting: thewookie5
Made some changes based on some feedback.

I used that value effectively with my updated trade. Just instead of a 2020 4th I opted for a 2021 3rd which would have similar value.

So your updated trade is:

Zadorov + 2021 COL 3rd for Samuelsson + 2020 BUF 2nd.

I'd be inclined to agree to that.

If we say that Samuelsson is worth an early 2nd (his draft position), then the trade breaks down to these two parts:

- Zadorov for 2020 BUF 2nd

and

- 2021 COL 3rd upgraded to an early 2nd (i.e. Samuelsson).

Now, whilst I'd value Zadorov at a 2nd + 3rd, if the 2nd is high enough I'd be inclined to accept a 2nd + 4th. But in this case instead of a 4th we're getting an upgrade from a 3rd to a 2nd. An upgrade like that is probably worth about a 4th (i.e. it effectively makes the trade an early 2nd for 3rd + 4th), so the value seems fair.
21 juin 2020 à 19 h 3
#11
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,584
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
Quoting: Skyraider112
That's a really bad Colorado trade. Samuelsson is already everything Zadorov is but better. He can actually skate unlike Z and he can get offense also unlike Z


Samuelsson is a 20 year old that has never played at a level above NCAA. Let's see him play a game against pro's before making ridiculous claims like that.

As for skating, there's absolutely nothing wrong with Zadorov's skating; in fact, it's actually one of his strong suits and is what allows him to be an effective defender in transition, as well as what allows him to be so dangerous at delivering big hits.

As for the offense, Zadorov is pretty limited offensively, but I think it's very premature to say that Samuelsson is better. He only has 2 goals in 30 games this season in the NCAA after all, and that's with PP time. I don't think he will be a Dman that can be counted on to put up points in the NHL.
21 juin 2020 à 20 h 58
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 30
Mentions "j'aime": 10
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Whether or not RFA rights are commonly worth a third or fourth doesn't apply to guys who already have signed a contract in the KHL. And the idea that a fourth is a throw-away (as implied by the elevation to a third if it turns out to be worth anything) is just not rational.

You have Henrique as your #2 C. That's by definition worth more than Ristolainen, whatever the risk that he starts declining in 2, 3 or 4 years. If they were playing the same position, your argument would have merit. Because they're not, it doesn't.


A 2/3D RHD is certainly worth more than even a 2C near his “expiration” date. Just because I place him as my 2C doesn’t make his value higher than if another team wanted him as a 3C. He’s about a 45 point guy which makes him somewhere between a 2C and a 3C statistically. Risto actually averages just under Henrique in point production with about 38 to 40 points a year. Thing is we need a center and Anaheim wants a RHD thus we are just hashing out our opinion on value. If Henrique were 28 I’d wholeheartedly agree with your opinion but he’s going to be at the dreaded 30+ years old point for all his remaining years and it’s unlikely he’d be a 45pt guy at 34.

As for Pilut, he has an opt out for an NHL contract. For another team to acquire him it would require something of value to return to Buffalo and a 5th is effectively nothing. We’d be better off just holding his rights until 2022 when his KHL contract ends.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage