SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Something has to be done

Créé par: canes2006
Équipe: 2016-17 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 22 août 2016
Publié: 22 août 2016
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Like Brekel said, you gotta pay to get...send McQuaid out and fix up he fourth line at the same time while free in up some cap...send three spects and a 1st for Trouba (I like Trouba more because he's a RHD). Overpaid for sure, but the Bruins become significantly stronger by upping their defence big time and solidifying their top 12
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
76 109 166 $
Transactions
1.
2.
BOS
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2017 (WPG)
Détails additionnels:
Jacob Trouba
WPG
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
  2. Subban, Malcolm
  3. Zboril, Jakub
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2017 (BOS)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2017
Logo de EDM
Logo de WPG
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de FLA
2018
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2019
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2373 000 000 $68 600 000 $0 $572 500 $4 400 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
925 000 $925 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
872 500 $872 500 $ (Bonis de performance157 500 $$158K)
AG, AD
UFA - 3
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 5
950 000 $950 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
6 916 667 $6 916 667 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 2
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 5
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
DG
UFA - 1
6 109 166 $6 109 166 $
DD
UFA - 2
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
G
UFA - 2
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
600 000 $600 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 août 2016 à 22 h 19
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 660
Mentions "j'aime": 30
That might be the worst Trouba trade yet. Why would the jets want more prospects and a goalie prospect? They have 2 really really good ones? A Trouba trade will be for players that can play in their top 6 now or can be a top 4 LHD. Do peope even think.
22 août 2016 à 23 h 30
#2
NO MORE LOCKOUTS!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2015
Messages: 48
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Sometimes you take what you can get bones. If the Jets are having trouble resigning Trouba this is a damn good package. Zboril is a fantastic RHD prospect that's more ready than most defensemen his age. Subban and DeBrusk are quality guys who may be able to jump in later if need be, and you can never have too many blue-chip prospects. What if another roster player begins demanding term or money the team can't afford? Debrusk and Zboril are also automatically expansion protected, which adds another layer of value. And this guy threw in a first round pick? Realistically that's between 10-20 overall.

You haven't been here long if you think this is the worst package for Trouba. Honestly what's this about top 6 forward/ top 4 LHD? If you think the Jets are that close to competing (the only logical explanation for scoffing at a prospect package this good) you're delusional. And if you think Chevy's going to do better for you than what Rosa's offered here, you're delusional.
23 août 2016 à 1 h 33
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 660
Mentions "j'aime": 30
Quoting: Pine_Tree
Sometimes you take what you can get bones. If the Jets are having trouble resigning Trouba this is a damn good package. Zboril is a fantastic RHD prospect that's more ready than most defensemen his age. Subban and DeBrusk are quality guys who may be able to jump in later if need be, and you can never have too many blue-chip prospects. What if another roster player begins demanding term or money the team can't afford? Debrusk and Zboril are also automatically expansion protected, which adds another layer of value. And this guy threw in a first round pick? Realistically that's between 10-20 overall.

You haven't been here long if you think this is the worst package for Trouba. Honestly what's this about top 6 forward/ top 4 LHD? If you think the Jets are that close to competing (the only logical explanation for scoffing at a prospect package this good) you're delusional. And if you think Chevy's going to do better for you than what Rosa's offered here, you're delusional.


The jets are much closer than people think bad special teams and goaltending was there down fall. They have been well above avg at 5vs5 the last 4 yrs. And I'm in Winnipeg the jets will get him signed. People on the outside know **** all.
23 août 2016 à 1 h 35
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 660
Mentions "j'aime": 30
And really why the fuckdo the jets want a goalie prospect are you stupid and they don't need RHD they have enough. The whole package makes no sense.
23 août 2016 à 1 h 36
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 660
Mentions "j'aime": 30
People are so clueless about the jets on here.
23 août 2016 à 2 h 5
#6
NO MORE LOCKOUTS!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2015
Messages: 48
Mentions "j'aime": 3
I'm not going to argue the Jets aren't capable of being an above average team. I'm going to argue that's about their ceiling next year. They're an exciting young team, but if they went to the second round of the playoffs next year that would be mission accomplished, hands down a phenomenal season. Next season, they are not competing for a cup. Next season, the Jets are competing for a wild card spot and their first playoff series win since the relocation.

I'm not going to argue that the Jets aren't signing Trouba because you're right; likely, he will be resigned. In my original reply I merely stated that hypothetically, were Trouba and Chevy unable to come to terms (and stranger things have happened), this package is a good package.

And why would the Jets want a goalie? Why would they want a RHD? Why does any team continue to develop prospects in positions of strength? Because **** happens and you can never have too many prospects. Because handedness isn't end-all and injuries happen. Lines can't be perfect and sometimes you want to be able to rely on good young prospects in the farm team. And goalies are voodoo, you can't count your chickens before they hatch. Kari Lehtonens and Eddie Lacks happen, young goalies can't always repeat strong rookie performances. Besides the whole point of this trade is that you're not going to have Trouba once its done. So you get a RHD with similar upside. Obviously not enough to warrant a one-for-one in the worst of times but that what the package is for. Taken as a whole, this package could be an acceptable replacement for Trouba.
23 août 2016 à 8 h 18
#7
Ross
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2016
Messages: 310
Mentions "j'aime": 9
Quoting: bones20
People are so clueless about the jets on here.


Are you really this upset about it? Calm down and explain to everyone like an adult.
23 août 2016 à 8 h 23
#8
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,703
Mentions "j'aime": 23,341
If the Jets, like most teams want immediate help for Trouba, couldn't there be a fairer offer. Gee, in this post Trouba is signed for 6.1 a year, You would think Beleskey would be a start ....he's only a 3.8m player
Maybe Myers would be a cheaper fit for the Bruins. Or wait till next year for the new group of UFAs.
23 août 2016 à 8 h 38
#9
BreKel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 3,537
Mentions "j'aime": 460
Why are you all fired up, Bones? Maybe the package doesn't fit what you deem as "needs" for Trouba, but value for value ... That is a solid offer.
23 août 2016 à 8 h 54
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 660
Mentions "j'aime": 30
Quoting: BreKel
Why are you all fired up, Bones? Maybe the package doesn't fit what you deem as "needs" for Trouba, but value for value ... That is a solid offer.


There is only value if both teams need the pieces involved. That package won't get you a top 2 dmen. Edmonton set the bar far to high. Market is set. Trouba will net you at least Tayler Hall value.
23 août 2016 à 8 h 58
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 660
Mentions "j'aime": 30
And you draft for talent and trade for need. I don't think that's a hard concept to get.
23 août 2016 à 9 h 2
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 660
Mentions "j'aime": 30
Quoting: Pine_Tree
I'm not going to argue the Jets aren't capable of being an above average team. I'm going to argue that's about their ceiling next year. They're an exciting young team, but if they went to the second round of the playoffs next year that would be mission accomplished, hands down a phenomenal season. Next season, they are not competing for a cup. Next season, the Jets are competing for a wild card spot and their first playoff series win since the relocation.

I'm not going to argue that the Jets aren't signing Trouba because you're right; likely, he will be resigned. In my original reply I merely stated that hypothetically, were Trouba and Chevy unable to come to terms (and stranger things have happened), this package is a good package.

And why would the Jets want a goalie? Why would they want a RHD? Why does any team continue to develop prospects in positions of strength? Because **** happens and you can never have too many prospects. Because handedness isn't end-all and injuries happen. Lines can't be perfect and sometimes you want to be able to rely on good young prospects in the farm team. And goalies are voodoo, you can't count your chickens before they hatch. Kari Lehtonens and Eddie Lacks happen, young goalies can't always repeat strong rookie performances. Besides the whole point of this trade is that you're not going to have Trouba once its done. So you get a RHD with similar upside. Obviously not enough to warrant a one-for-one in the worst of times but that what the package is for. Taken as a whole, this package could be an acceptable replacement for Trouba.


The point is you draft for talent and trade for need. Jets have no RHD need. Another point is why get a goalie you can't protect in the upcoming expansion draft? That is also poor asset management. And people Trouba is a top 2 dmen. There is a ton of stats and prove that show he can play and succeed in that role.
23 août 2016 à 9 h 3
#13
BreKel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 3,537
Mentions "j'aime": 460
Quoting: bones20
Quoting: BreKel
Why are you all fired up, Bones? Maybe the package doesn't fit what you deem as "needs" for Trouba, but value for value ... That is a solid offer.


There is only value if both teams need the pieces involved. That package won't get you a top 2 dmen. Edmonton set the bar far to high. Market is set. Trouba will net you at least Tayler Hall value.


Oh you're one of those people. I'm sorry, but what one team does with a player doesn't "set the bar". You are not getting that value for Trouba.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage