SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

NHL Future Value Roster 1st Team

Créé par: BuFfaLOFaN
Équipe: 2019-20 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 25 mai 2020
Publié: 25 mai 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This Factors in age, current skill, future projected skill, contract, leadership to their team, and some bias from me!.
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
31999 999 999 $157 884 023 $0 $21 442 500 $842 115 976 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 8
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 893 000 $10 893 000 $
AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
4 995 000 $4 995 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 634 000 $11 634 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 6
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 6
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
730 833 $730 833 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
UFA - 8
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 166 667 $6 166 667 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance360 000 $$360K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance550 000 $$550K)
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
G
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
DG
UFA - 6

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 mai 2020 à 6 h 23
#26
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,727
Mentions "j'aime": 31,454
Quoting: Caniac2000
How? Laine is known for being a one-trick pony. He doesn't defend, his transitions are average at best, he's got an elite shot, but so does Svech. Svech is good defensively and getting better, his transitions are nuts... I'm not just saying this as a Canes fan, I'm saying this as an analytical head, why do you think Laine is better overall, where is he better than Svech?


See his stats again for this year. He's made great development defensively, he plays more for his team rather than just shooting the puck and he has more points than Svechnikov while playing with f*cking Copp as his center.

Overall his team is now much better with him on ice than it was before.
26 mai 2020 à 6 h 35
#27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,554
Mentions "j'aime": 5,040
Quoting: justaBoss
See his stats again for this year. He's made great development defensively, he plays more for his team rather than just shooting the puck and he has more points than Svechnikov while playing with f*cking Copp as his center.

Overall his team is now much better with him on ice than it was before.


Andrei Svechnikov played the majority of the season with Jordan Staal and Warren f*cking Foegele. Combined they have 47 points.....

Laine made developments, sure. But it couldn't have gotten much worse, Hockeyviz still says he's a big liability defensively. Laine's tranisiton stats have to be modified because he doesn't hit the attempt threshold, so he doesn't move from defence to offence. He shoots the puck, and that's about it statistically speaking.
26 mai 2020 à 6 h 50
#28
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,727
Mentions "j'aime": 31,454
Quoting: Caniac2000
Andrei Svechnikov played the majority of the season with Jordan Staal and Warren f*cking Foegele. Combined they have 47 points.....

Laine made developments, sure. But it couldn't have gotten much worse, Hockeyviz still says he's a big liability defensively. Laine's tranisiton stats have to be modified because he doesn't hit the attempt threshold, so he doesn't move from defence to offence. He shoots the puck, and that's about it statistically speaking.


Don't know about how hockeyviz rate players, but yeah I know Laine is not exactly known for his defensive game.

Imo Laine's biggest weakness has been throughout his whole career his inconsistency. There's been phases where he's one the best players in the league, and then there's have been phases where he would've struggled in f*cking ECHL.

This year statistically speaking Laine has become more of a playmaker for his team. Instead of shooting as much, he passes the puck more often. And he has done pretty well in that. Statistically this is his best season thus far.

I can fully understand how one would view Svechnikov as the better of the two. Frankly after watching his stats he is better all around player.

Still I do see more potential in Laine than Svechnikov, because he has shown that he's virtually unstoppable when his confidence hits the ceiling. October and November of 2018 was a good example of that.

And this was the point of this post. The future value of NHL players...
26 mai 2020 à 7 h 8
#29
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,554
Mentions "j'aime": 5,040
Quoting: justaBoss
Don't know about how hockeyviz rate players, but yeah I know Laine is not exactly known for his defensive game.

Imo Laine's biggest weakness has been throughout his whole career his inconsistency. There's been phases where he's one the best players in the league, and then there's have been phases where he would've struggled in f*cking ECHL.

This year statistically speaking Laine has become more of a playmaker for his team. Instead of shooting as much, he passes the puck more often. And he has done pretty well in that. Statistically this is his best season thus far.

I can fully understand how one would view Svechnikov as the better of the two. Frankly after watching his stats he is better all around player.

Still I do see more potential in Laine than Svechnikov, because he has shown that he's virtually unstoppable when his confidence hits the ceiling. October and November of 2018 was a good example of that.

And this was the point of this post. The future value of NHL players...


Did you miss the fact Svechnikov was almost a point per game at the age of 19? Laine had 47 even-strength points this year, Svechnikov had 41 with far worse linemates (Laine played with Copp, and Kyle Connor, it's a far cry from Jordan Staal and Warren Foegele). On top of that, he's far better all around, his passing and his shot are just mad. This was also just his 2nd year in the NHL... I don't understand how you can see more potential in Laine than Svech.... are you looking at this through rose-tinted glasses? I know you're Finnish, does that have anything to do with it? Otherwise, I don't know how you can say Laine has a higher Ceiling than Svechnikov.
26 mai 2020 à 7 h 10
#30
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,727
Mentions "j'aime": 31,454
Quoting: Caniac2000
Did you miss the fact Svechnikov was almost a point per game at the age of 19? Laine had 47 even-strength points this year, Svechnikov had 41 with far worse linemates (Laine played with Copp, and Kyle Connor, it's a far cry from Jordan Staal and Warren Foegele). On top of that, he's far better all around, his passing and his shot are just mad. This was also just his 2nd year in the NHL... I don't understand how you can see more potential in Laine than Svech.... are you looking at this through rose-tinted glasses? I know you're Finnish, does that have anything to do with it? Otherwise, I don't know how you can say Laine has a higher Ceiling than Svechnikov.


Maybe I'm biased. But Laine performed points-wise pretty much just as well Svech does at 19.
26 mai 2020 à 7 h 17
#31
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,554
Mentions "j'aime": 5,040
Quoting: justaBoss
Maybe I'm biased. But Laine performed points-wise pretty much just as well Svech does at 19.


Laine had 2 more points this year than Svech did. Svech is 2 years younger....
26 mai 2020 à 7 h 19
#32
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,727
Mentions "j'aime": 31,454
Quoting: Caniac2000
Laine had 2 more points this year than Svech did. Svech is 2 years younger....


Laine had 70 points when he turned 20... So there's that. Then there was that slump year.
26 mai 2020 à 7 h 34
#33
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,554
Mentions "j'aime": 5,040
Quoting: justaBoss
Laine had 70 points when he turned 20... So there's that. Then there was that slump year.


Svech was on pace for 74.... so there's that.
26 mai 2020 à 7 h 39
#34
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,727
Mentions "j'aime": 31,454
Quoting: Caniac2000
Svech was on pace for 74.... so there's that.


But he wasn't 2nd in goals in the whole league only behind Ovechkin...so there's that.

I dunno why we're going with this. I already conceded Svechnikov is the better player of the two.
26 mai 2020 à 7 h 50
#35
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,554
Mentions "j'aime": 5,040
Quoting: justaBoss
But he wasn't 2nd in goals in the whole league only behind Ovechkin...so there's that.

I dunno why we're going with this. I already conceded Svechnikov is the better player of the two.


But he was the 2nd leading goal scorer on a team with some crappy forwards so there's that.

Idk tbh
26 mai 2020 à 8 h 14
#36
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,507
Mentions "j'aime": 6,514
Quoting: CD282
What's your excuse for having Draisaitl 7th on talent?!

Look back four years and you'll see he's a top player in the league:

1. McDavid: 306, 146-275-421
2. Kucherov: 304, 153-245-398
3. DRAISAITL: 313, 147-215-362
.
.
6. MacKinnon: 307, 131-211-342
.
.
9. Crosby: 277, 124-201-325
.
11. Malkin: 263, 121-195-316
.
.
14. Scheifele: 292, 122-177-299
.
.
.
18. Barkov: 288, 103-185-288
19. Matthews: 282, 158-127-285
.
.
.
23. Eichel: 273, 113-168-281

Even if you're predisposed towards recency bias (which all of us are), you could look at the past 2 years:

1. DRAISAITL: 153, 93-122-215
2. McDavid: 142, 75-138-213
3. Kucherov: 150, 74-139-213
4. Kane: 151, 77-117-194
5. MacKinnon: 151, 76-116-192
.
.
.
.
.
.
12. Eichel: 145, 64-96-160
13. Barkov: 148, 55-103-158
14. Scheifele: 153, 67-90-157
.
.
17. Point: 145, 66-90-156
.
19. Matthews: 138, 84-69-153

Draisaitl has more goals and more assists than both Matthews and Eichel over the past 2 years. Only Ovechkin has scored more goals in this timeframe (99) and nobody has more points.

Either your personal perspective is a LOT more biased than you're prepared to admit or you're a piss-poor talent evaluator.


Nah... I've watched Draisaitl play and he is a very very gifted player, his shot is amazing, but not better than Eichel or Matthews. His passing is amazing and I'd give him a little edge over the other 2 centers. All 3 have great vision. Draisaitl is a beast and I like the guy a lot, he's 7th after Barkov but easily and probably could be 6th. I think that Draisaitl although he is an amazingly talented player draws on his linemates to get the puck to him and he isn't t he type of player who can drive the puck from one side of the ice to the other multiple times a game like Eichel or Matthews. Obviously scoring points is important, Matthews is probably the best 5v5 goalscorers in the league, or atleast top2-3. Eichel is steadily increasing, kinda like MacKinnon, I think he will prove he can score as well as Draisaitl in the next couple years easily. Not I get Draisaitl had been better, and this is based off of what they will be in the future if you where resetting the NHL and drafting it all over. Eichel and Matthews also have better 200 foot games
26 mai 2020 à 8 h 20
#37
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,507
Mentions "j'aime": 6,514
Quoting: Caniac2000
But he was the 2nd leading goal scorer on a team with some crappy forwards so there's that.

Idk tbh


Quoting: justaBoss
But he wasn't 2nd in goals in the whole league only behind Ovechkin...so there's that.

I dunno why we're going with this. I already conceded Svechnikov is the better player of the two.


Svech is the better player, but if they where the same age competing we would say that they where pretty equal but Svechnikov had the benefit of clutch play, Lacrosse goal in the 3rd period to tie the game. He is very confident as well showing in his lacrosse goals...
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage