SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Stop trading Kerfoot for Wallmark

Créé par: Torontoleafs15
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 21 avr. 2020
Publié: 21 avr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Kerfoot is way better than Wallmark. A florida trade would look like this
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
1700 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
63 800 000 $
2700 000 $
11 400 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1700 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Weegar, MacKenzie [Droits de RFA]
FLA
  1. Abruzzese, Nick [Liste de réserve]
  2. Dermott, Travis [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Honka, Julius [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (DAL)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de VGK
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de DAL
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $81 472 283 $0 $400 000 $27 717 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
821 667 $821 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 2
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
737 500 $737 500 $
AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 avr. 2020 à 14 h 40
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,588
Mentions "j'aime": 5,458
Offensively, Kerfoot is better. Defensively, Wallmark. Just depends which guy you need more for your team.
21 avr. 2020 à 14 h 48
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 6,836
Mentions "j'aime": 5,302
And you know that's what a Florida trade would look like because of all your inside connections?
21 avr. 2020 à 14 h 50
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 6,836
Mentions "j'aime": 5,302
Quoting: bhavikp27
Offensively, Kerfoot is better. Defensively, Wallmark. Just depends which guy you need more for your team.


Kerfoot's actually as good, if not better, than Wallmark defensively.
21 avr. 2020 à 14 h 54
#4
Lets Go Blues
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 6,786
Mentions "j'aime": 4,336
But you didn't mention the difference in cap hits. Not sure what Wallmark will get on his next deal, but if rostering Wallmark instead of Kerfoot allows the Leafs to use a 23-man roster with proven depth options instead of LTIR loopholes, OHL stars, and KHL scrubs (heh), then wouldn't that trade make them better?

We can laugh at the Barclay Goodrow trade, and to an extent, the Coleman trade was an overpay too, but you have to consider the importance of cheap depth to GMs of top-heavy teams. IMO Dubas conceded having a regular 3rd line construction (3-4m cap hit per player) when he gave all the money to their top guys. He would be smart to re-load the 3rd line with cheap options each year.
bhavikp27 a aimé ceci.
21 avr. 2020 à 14 h 59
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,588
Mentions "j'aime": 5,458
Quoting: LeafsFanForSomeReason
Kerfoot's actually as good, if not better, than Wallmark defensively.


Proof?
21 avr. 2020 à 15 h 0
#6
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 1,893
Mentions "j'aime": 737
Quoting: A_K
But you didn't mention the difference in cap hits. Not sure what Wallmark will get on his next deal, but if rostering Wallmark instead of Kerfoot allows the Leafs to use a 23-man roster with proven depth options instead of LTIR loopholes, OHL stars, and KHL scrubs (heh), then wouldn't that trade make them better?

We can laugh at the Barclay Goodrow trade, and to an extent, the Coleman trade was an overpay too, but you have to consider the importance of cheap depth to GMs of top-heavy teams. IMO Dubas conceded having a regular 3rd line construction (3-4m cap hit per player) when he gave all the money to their top guys. He would be smart to re-load the 3rd line with cheap options each year.


What is the point of doing that though? Are we gonna have a bad 3rd line centre? He is not good and is more of a 4th liner. Leafs don't need him. Kerfoot is much better.
Wallmark may get like 700k less there is no point
21 avr. 2020 à 15 h 3
#7
Lets Go Blues
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 6,786
Mentions "j'aime": 4,336
Quoting: Torontoleafs15
What is the point of doing that though? Are we gonna have a bad 3rd line centre? He is not good and is more of a 4th liner. Leafs don't need him. Kerfoot is much better.
Wallmark may get like 700k less there is no point


Tbh when I originally posted I thought 675k was Wallmark's AAV for next season too... but the general point still stands: there is so much money tied up in the star players that trading guys like Kerfoot, Johnsson, and Kapanen for worse-but-cheaper players might have to happen, especially when the cap isn't rising. You did it to Johnsson in this mock, why would trading Kerfoot be so crazy? And yes, I'm saying you might have to have a bad 3C since your 1Ca and 1Cb make over 11 million apiece.
21 avr. 2020 à 15 h 35
#8
Vido
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 159
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: bhavikp27
Proof?


You're going to have to watch the games. Kerfoot is better for the leafs defensively as 3C than offensive. If you're saying Walmark is worse offensively that'd be a huge L for the Leafs.
21 avr. 2020 à 16 h 16
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,588
Mentions "j'aime": 5,458
Quoting: Vido
You're going to have to watch the games. Kerfoot is better for the leafs defensively as 3C than offensive. If you're saying Walmark is worse offensively that'd be a huge L for the Leafs.


Okay, the eye test. Lol

Kerfoot is better defensively, of course, they have Tavares and Matthews in front of him...

And Wallmark was .37 in Pts/GP, Kerfoot .43 so the gap wasn't as big as you believe
21 avr. 2020 à 16 h 23
#10
Vido
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 159
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: bhavikp27
Okay, the eye test. Lol

Kerfoot is better defensively, of course, they have Tavares and Matthews in front of him...

And Wallmark was .37 in Pts/GP, Kerfoot .43 so the gap wasn't as big as you believe


Kerfoot played with Tavares half the year so, his ppg would be inflated compared to Wallmark.

And a players defensive play doesn't change on who's based on there team lol
21 avr. 2020 à 16 h 49
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,588
Mentions "j'aime": 5,458
Quoting: Vido
Kerfoot played with Tavares half the year so, his ppg would be inflated compared to Wallmark.

And a players defensive play doesn't change on who's based on there team lol


You said " Kerfoot is better for the leafs defensively as 3C than offensive "

well of course, Tavares and Matthews do the offensive part
21 avr. 2020 à 16 h 52
#12
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 1,893
Mentions "j'aime": 737
Quoting: bhavikp27
You said " Kerfoot is better for the leafs defensively as 3C than offensive "

well of course, Tavares and Matthews do the offensive part


Not gonna lie. Kerfoot did get most of his points when he was playing wih jt and marner. He played with them for a quarter of the season and was better
bhavikp27 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage