SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Investing a solid defense and goaltending

Créé par: AllJonedOut
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 14 mars 2020
Publié: 14 mars 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Build a really solid defense and really solid goaltending tandem. The offense will follow
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1700 000 $
43 750 000 $
1800 000 $
1925 000 $
1800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
46 000 000 $
44 500 000 $
1700 000 $
Transactions
SJS
  1. Ho-Sang, Joshua [Droits de RFA]
NYI
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (SJS)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TBL
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de OTT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2284 000 000 $76 736 666 $0 $297 500 $7 263 334 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
763 333 $763 333 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 mars 2020 à 21 h 15
#1
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,765
Mentions "j'aime": 31,478
With Lehner turning 29 this summer, I think he should make a long-term contract with a team if he becomes UFA, if he wants to secure a great income.

This deal would see him end up as UFA at 33, making getting a good contract nigh impossible.

I'd expect to see a 6-7 year deal for $7,5-8M. Considering what kind of contracts elite goalies have gotten as of late, even that would be a cheap deal.
14 mars 2020 à 21 h 45
#2
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,356
Mentions "j'aime": 5,680
Quoting: BurgerBoss
With Lehner turning 29 this summer, I think he should make a long-term contract with a team if he becomes UFA, if he wants to secure a great income.

This deal would see him end up as UFA at 33, making getting a good contract nigh impossible.

I'd expect to see a 6-7 year deal for $7,5-8M. Considering what kind of contracts elite goalies have gotten as of late, even that would be a cheap deal.


I think GM's are *beginning* to wise up to long term goalie contracts at high cap hits and combined with the fact that Lehner doesn't have the illustrious history as the other goalies getting those deals I don't think he gets more than 4-5 years. I think 8aav is the absolute max but I'd wager OP is close here. Say 5@6.5 ish is around what I'd bet on.
14 mars 2020 à 22 h 7
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 27
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Don't want Ho-Sang in the top 6. I would rather not pay a 3rd pairing guy 4.5 million and use that money for a top 6 player. Labanc also isn't a top line player. You can trade Sörensen to save a little bit more money.
15 mars 2020 à 2 h 34
#4
Démarrer sujet
AllJonedOut
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,463
Mentions "j'aime": 266
Quoting: Burns88
Don't want Ho-Sang in the top 6. I would rather not pay a 3rd pairing guy 4.5 million and use that money for a top 6 player. Labanc also isn't a top line player. You can trade Sörensen to save a little bit more money.


I don’t get why we wouldn’t want ho sang. He’s fast, he cheap. And he’s got a HUGE chip on his shoulder. Reminds me of timo last year. His potential is top 6/middle 6 why not see what he has. Gudas isn’t a “3rd pairing d-man”. Just he’d be with Vlasic in a defense shutdown pairing. Bring him gives our defense a shutdown right d-man which also frees up ek65 and lets him have more offensive zone time which is where he is best.
15 mars 2020 à 12 h 40
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 27
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: Ihaveajoner
I don’t get why we wouldn’t want ho sang. He’s fast, he cheap. And he’s got a HUGE chip on his shoulder. Reminds me of timo last year. His potential is top 6/middle 6 why not see what he has. Gudas isn’t a “3rd pairing d-man”. Just he’d be with Vlasic in a defense shutdown pairing. Bring him gives our defense a shutdown right d-man which also frees up ek65 and lets him have more offensive zone time which is where he is best.


His potential may be a top 6/middle 6 guy but he isn't one yet. We shouldn't too much more money on our defense given we have 3 huge contracts already.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage