SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Leafs Deadline 2019

Créé par: FrustratedToronto
Équipe: 2019-20 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 27 janv. 2020
Publié: 5 févr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Just having a bit of fun trying to re-sculpt the roster heading into the post-deadline part of the season. Will probably take this roster into the off-season, too.

TRADE 1 (VGK/TML)
WHY IT WORKS FOR VEGAS:
Vegas missed out on Erik Karlsson twice and are still in desperate need of a puck moving D. Barrie can slide right into a pairing with Brayden McNabb and be right at home. And I think Vegas can afford to extend him at the end of the year where Toronto likely can't without losing Muzzin. McNabb, who is locked in for a few more seasons and is an established Top-4 in their system, is the reason Hague is moveable.

WHY IT WORKS FOR TORONTO:
They pick up a couple picks for Barrie to start, but also a prospect defenseman (albeit LHD) with size who is cost controlled. He blocks shots, is big and physical, has offensive instincts (was a beast in the OHL). Reaves is a bit of a throw-in to offset some of the salary coming back but he provides the Leafs 4th line with some physicality and swagger. And, he's a UFA at the end of the deal so Toronto isn't locked in.

TRADE 2 (ANH/TOR)
WHY IT WORKS FOR THE DUCKS:
A rebuilding team trading two veteran players for picks, prospects, etc. Sounds about right. They struggle scoring so they get Kapanen, a 20+ goal guy with Top-6 potential, as well as Bracco who could be a middle-6 PP weapon. Dermott also goes to ANH to give them a cheap defensive player.

WHY IT WORKS FOR TORONTO:
Start by saying YES, this is a bit of an overpay
However, they get a reliable backup G for the season, shed Cody Ceci's contract, and get back a legit top pair D who passes the eye-test and the analytical evaluation. And they also shed a bit of cap in the process while yes, having to overpay a bit to do it.

FINAL STATEMENT
The team adds some size, some grit, a defensive RHD, a defensive LHD, neither of which should be incapable of playing in Keefe's system, and even if you disagree with Reeves they can let him go after a year. They overpay a bit to ANH but they'll have to to get Manson and Miller.

I may be doing a 2020 roster continuing my work with this one soon to finish my vision but we'll see. I enjoy people eviscerate this roster, but no one being able to agree if Toronto gives too much or too little lol
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Hague, Nicolas
  2. Reaves, Ryan
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (VGK)
Détails additionnels:
Conditional 2020 2nd round pick - Becomes 2020 3rd round pick if Barrie doesn't re-sign with Vegas
2.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de CBJ
Logo de VGK
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $76 925 200 $0 $1 332 500 $4 574 800 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 634 000 $11 634 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 893 000 $10 893 000 $
AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
2 775 000 $2 775 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
791 667 $791 667 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 200 000 $$1M)
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 févr. 2020 à 6 h 20
#1
gregb569
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,296
Mentions "j'aime": 390
I don't think any team that's looking to get into the playoffs has ever traded 1/2 of their D core at the deadline but yeah... I guess
5 févr. 2020 à 7 h 12
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
That Manson deal is awful. Ducks pass. Any deal for Manson would have to contain Liljegren/Sandin. Leafs don’t want to do that, so no deal to be made.
5 févr. 2020 à 7 h 18
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,749
Mentions "j'aime": 7,382
Reaves is awful and wouldnt add anything to the roster but dead cap space in the shape of a human coke machine
5 févr. 2020 à 8 h 28
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,797
Mentions "j'aime": 564
I'm not sure either team agrees to that. Anaheim wants a defenceman back and Toronto's best trade chips are forwards. Perhaps a 3-way deal makes more sense? Nashville has some nice RHD prospects in the AHL that are blocked by Ellis/Fabbro, Carolina is always interested in Kappy and might be willing to part with Jake Bean.

Huge trades are tough to pull off right now. With the Leafs cap situation (and many other teams being in LTIR as well) the salary is tough to balance. Not to mention we are discussing players with term left, which are more likely to move in the offseason then at the deadline.
FrustratedToronto a aimé ceci.
5 févr. 2020 à 10 h 9
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 148
Mentions "j'aime": 47
Quoting: gregb569
I don't think any team that's looking to get into the playoffs has ever traded 1/2 of their D core at the deadline but yeah... I guess



That is fair. I doubt it, too. But I think they have a chance to maximize some value and sure up some weaknesses and I'd hate to see them miss it. They could have dealt JVR and Bozak and Leo and Gardiner for value but passed for playoff runs. If ever they were going to make some big splashes and capitalize on something this down year might be it. But I hear what you're saying
5 févr. 2020 à 10 h 13
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 148
Mentions "j'aime": 47
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
Reaves is awful and wouldnt add anything to the roster but dead cap space in the shape of a human coke machine


Agreed, sort of, but I know Vegas needs to move cap out to take some and I like Hague and a 2nd for Barrie. Hell, Leafs could probably flip Reaves right after for a pick but I kept him for the added physicality. I'm not married to him and on an expiring deal neither is Toronto
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage