SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Lets break the cycle - NYR trade

Créé par: claysbar
Équipe: 2019-20 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 31 janv. 2020
Publié: 31 janv. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Yeah, PIT loses a 1st but they gain this year in the addition of Kreider and possibly Smith. Quite a few people on here thought Smith would have fit in nicely with PIT's system when he went to free agency but was looking for more money than PIT could afford. If he doesn't work out, he could be buried this year or bought out next year. PIT also gains some G depth with a guy who went fairly high and has pedigree but saw some health issues this past 12 months. The addition of POJ probably needs some more back from NYR but I think it's minor adjustments. NYR gets some cap relief for next year (for a re-building team they are horribly cap strapped), a 1st rounder (again, for a re-building team, they have very few picks) and a guy who could be a 4-5 D in a year or two.
Transactions
PIT
  1. Kreider, Chris
  2. Lindbom, Olof [Liste de réserve]
  3. Smith, Brendan (2 175 000 $ retained)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (NYR)
NYR
  1. Galchenyuk, Alex (2 450 000 $ retained)
  2. Jones, Ryan [Liste de réserve]
  3. Joseph, Pierre-Olivier
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (PIT)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de PIT
Logo de NYR
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $75 356 625 $132 500 $3 700 000 $6 143 375 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 625 000 $4 625 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
874 125 $874 125 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
DG/DD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
31 janv. 2020 à 15 h 41
#1
Leafs suck )
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 344
Mentions "j'aime": 61
Don’t see why Pittsburgh is paying so much tho. Is galchenyuk that bad?
31 janv. 2020 à 15 h 42
#2
MartysBetter
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 787
Mentions "j'aime": 181
Quoting: ArizonaCoyotes
Don’t see why Pittsburgh is paying so much tho. Is galchenyuk that bad?


Yes
claysbar a aimé ceci.
31 janv. 2020 à 15 h 42
#3
Leafs suck )
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 344
Mentions "j'aime": 61
Quoting: MartysBetter29
Yes


As a yotes fan, POJ is literally not good. He’s a bust.
31 janv. 2020 à 15 h 44
#4
Démarrer sujet
claysbar
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 747
Mentions "j'aime": 94
Quoting: ArizonaCoyotes
Don’t see why Pittsburgh is paying so much tho. Is galchenyuk that bad?


I think this would be more paying in cash to get better returns. For this year eating the 50% retention is because they can with Jake G being on LTIR. After DeSmith, I would have a shot at getting in games @ Wilkes-Barre so getting a recent 2nd rounder in goal would in it self be quite the coup.
31 janv. 2020 à 15 h 44
#5
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 43,571
Mentions "j'aime": 24,309
Quoting: ArizonaCoyotes
As a yotes fan, POJ is literally not good. He’s a bust.


Pitt should boo Kessel for nixing that Minny trade lol. Galchenyuk is going to leave for free and POJ is meh. They could've got Zucker lol
FireBotts a aimé ceci.
31 janv. 2020 à 15 h 45
#6
Jaromir_Jagr_the_leg
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 3,859
Mentions "j'aime": 787
Think a lot of people overrate there cap situation next year the rangers are likely gonna make a trade like skjei or deangelo bc of the issues of have too many guys plus them trading Kreider and maybe smith to Ottawa
31 janv. 2020 à 15 h 49
#7
Leafs suck )
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 344
Mentions "j'aime": 61
Quoting: claysbar
I think this would be more paying in cash to get better returns. For this year eating the 50% retention is because they can with Jake G being on LTIR. After DeSmith, I would have a shot at getting in games @ Wilkes-Barre so getting a recent 2nd rounder in goal would in it self be quite the coup.


That makes sense. Rangers easily take it tho. Gotta imagine they say getting a first, former first LHD POJ even tho he sucks, and dumping Smith? They take it.
31 janv. 2020 à 16 h 10
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 1,440
Pens say no easily
31 janv. 2020 à 18 h 7
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 80
Mentions "j'aime": 14
I would say yes if im the rangers. Getting the first and getting rid of smiths 4mm cap hit next year probably lets them re-sign krieder in the off season if they want or not trade TDA. Its not the best use of krieder as an asset but come deadline it would be an acceptable strategic offer.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage