Over pay for Subban

Is this a hot fuzz reference?

Also, no one should even consider Subban unless New Jersey retains.

I'm perplexed. Bjugstad and Murray are more valuable than the two bodies that went in the Subban trade, and the other two pieces were two seconds -- instead of which, you're giving a first, a second, two more picks plus a likely NHLer. What gives? Did Subban suddenly become better?

That Subban trade value is outdated about a half a decade or so.
Does Pittsburgh needs to do a lot of trading? Last I looked at the standings they were doing pretty well.

Having two good and fairly cheap goaltenders in Murray and Jarry is exactly what we had with Fleur and Murray. Don't know why people want to trade him and go back to the rotating door of crap backups we've had for the last couple of years...

Also, I think one of bjugstad or galchenyuk could stay I'm kind of on the fence about it. Or both could go. Johnson has been good and I he should be kept. Despite his season I still like the idea of having Schultz I think he'll step it up in the playoffs. Riikola has been decent in the time he's played.

So with all that I think the team is playing great and we could just add one forward hopefully named Coleman, zucker, or Connor brown and we'd be good

Columbus can’t afford Johnson unless Pittsburgh is willing to take cap back. And as that trade is a cap dump it’s not going to happen.

Ten years ago the Subban trade would have been good, but it isn’t. Subban is brutal...

just delete this hot trash.
Dumo for garbage.