SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Playoff Push and Homecoming

Créé par: CanesQue
Équipe: 2019-20 Hurricanes de la Caroline
Date de création initiale: 16 janv. 2020
Publié: 16 janv. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
CAR
  1. Brodin, Jonas
  2. Staal, Eric (1 250 000 $ retained)
MIN
  1. Gardiner, Jake
  2. Kuokkanen, Janne
  3. Mattheos, Stelio
  4. McGinn, Brock
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (CAR)
  6. Choix de 7e ronde en 2020 (CAR)
2.
NYR
  1. Reimer, James (1 200 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (NYR)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (CAR)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CAR
Logo de TOR
Logo de BUF
Logo de CAR
Logo de TOR
2021
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de STL
2022
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $77 389 833 $0 $4 640 000 $4 110 167 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
8 454 000 $8 454 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
375 000 $375 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
746 667 $746 667 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
675 000 $675 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
700 000 $700 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 300 000 $$1M)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
4 166 667 $4 166 667 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 025 000 $4 025 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 janv. 2020 à 18 h 17
#26
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 8,748
Mentions "j'aime": 3,601
You lost me when you said SV% is the best way to judge a goalie.

Quoting: ChiHawk
The West is not terrible, the Pacific isn't as strong as the central (Col, Dallas, St Louis), but overall, no division is "terrible" in today's league with so much parity.

Canes have one of the strongest defenses in the league. Can every team improve even in areas of strength? Of course but this is hardly a weak spot and all the stats support this. Reimer has not been horrible, very middle of the road based on SV % which is the best way to evaluate a goalie. At .917 it is indeed respectable. Mrazek on the other hand at .906 is a middle of the road backup. The point is, name a recent team that won a cup that didn't have outstanding goaltending. Maybe reimer gets hot in the playoffs and can take you there? If Lehner was available, top 6 in the league and seeing an average of 38 shots a game, he would be the difference between Carolina going the distance and not. Not saying Lehner is the guy but somebody like that of that ability. I don't think anyone would argue Lehner is a big upgrade to Reimer.

To the original point, can you take an area of strength (defense) and make it better? Of course, but I believe Carolina already has a good enough defense to win a cup. I think they can add some forward gritty type of player depth and a top 10 goaltender and be a cup favorite before adding more defense.
16 janv. 2020 à 19 h 34
#27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,186
Mentions "j'aime": 9,534
Quoting: Caniac555
You lost me when you said SV% is the best way to judge a goalie.


It's the ultimate stat; how many shots on net against and how many go in. It's the #1 stat to judge a goalie. From there you can break it down to high danger chances etc, but that is indeed the number one stat to start with.
16 janv. 2020 à 21 h 42
#28
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,186
Mentions "j'aime": 9,534
Quoting: Caniac555
You lost me when you said SV% is the best way to judge a goalie.


Tonight, another fine example of why you guys need a goalie...that goal by Atkinson especially should have been handled by Mrazek. Mrazek with an astounding .833 SV% tonight. Yes, you could upgrade TVR but at the end of the night, goaltending let the Canes down. Seen this movie before...
CanesQue a aimé ceci.
17 janv. 2020 à 7 h 58
#29
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,765
Mentions "j'aime": 9,937
Modifié 17 janv. 2020 à 8 h 16
Quoting: ChiHawk
Tonight, another fine example of why you guys need a goalie...that goal by Atkinson especially should have been handled by Mrazek. Mrazek with an astounding .833 SV% tonight. Yes, you could upgrade TVR but at the end of the night, goaltending let the Canes down. Seen this movie before...


Werenski's was on Mrazek. CAR technically won a challenge on a goal because offsides happened entering the zone...so while that doesn't affect the actual stats...that was a goal on Mrazek. Gardiner came and saved Mrazek on another...again not reflected in the stats. Foligno's was NOT on Petr. Fluke stick by Staal that feed a well positioned Foligno. The D was the problem on the Game winner. With that said, we talk about the differences between stats and eye test. There are games like Tampa (1/5/2020) where I can say despite letting up 3 goals...it was the Hamilton/Slavin pair that had a terrible night. That's an eye test win for Mrazek. He couldn't do anything about those 3 goals. Sometimes your best pair has an off night, but there are games like last night where he has an eye test loss. Where multiple technicalities is the reason it wasn't 5-2.
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage