SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Seabrook to Florida

Créé par: Kyle_Davidson
Équipe: 2019-20 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 23 déc. 2019
Publié: 23 déc. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
FLA
  1. Gustafsson, Erik
  2. Seabrook, Brent (1 875 000 $ retained)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $58 696 686 $0 $7 665 000 $22 803 314 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
775 833 $775 833 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
UFA - 7
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 déc. 2019 à 16 h 0
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 11
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Oh I'd love it, but that NMC is hard to get by. I want Gustafsson bad, he's gonna get paid this offseason
23 déc. 2019 à 16 h 2
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 391
Mentions "j'aime": 143
this trade makes it very hard for florida to sign all three of gudbranson, hoffman, dadonov. they do with up with a D logjam and it may be worth it for them to say yes and figure it out by dealing players like pysyk and letting guys like weegar walk, but the cap headache is enough of a deterrent that florida can't snap this up.
23 déc. 2019 à 16 h 5
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 881
Mentions "j'aime": 262
So where's the incentive for FLA to take the worst contract in the league?
23 déc. 2019 à 16 h 11
#4
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,909
Mentions "j'aime": 5,889
Quoting: TheChief
So where's the incentive for FLA to take the worst contract in the league?


Erik Gus + Retention + Taking back Matheson.
23 déc. 2019 à 16 h 14
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 881
Mentions "j'aime": 262
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
Erik Gus + Retention + Taking back Matheson.


Gus hasn't been anything special, also acquiring Seabrook basically makes resigning him impossible. Matheson is still decent and only 25. CHI will have to add and a lot. Top prospect at the least. Otherwise this is just freaking terrible.
23 déc. 2019 à 16 h 15
#6
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,909
Mentions "j'aime": 5,889
Quoting: TheChief
Gus hasn't been anything special, also acquiring Seabrook basically makes resigning him impossible. Matheson is still decent and only 25. CHI will have to add and a lot. Top prospect at the least. Otherwise this is just freaking terrible.


I mean, from the other responses, it doesn’t seem terrible.
23 déc. 2019 à 16 h 18
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,237
Mentions "j'aime": 617
Got to better if you want the Cats the absorb Seabrook’s contract
23 déc. 2019 à 16 h 20
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 881
Mentions "j'aime": 262
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
I mean, from the other responses, it doesn’t seem terrible.


Have there been any other responses but CHI fans or people stating the obvious?
23 déc. 2019 à 16 h 24
#9
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,752
Mentions "j'aime": 31,471
This sucks. It's like CGY giving up Lucic and Brodie in exchange to Määttä.
23 déc. 2019 à 16 h 24
#10
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,909
Mentions "j'aime": 5,889
Quoting: TheChief
Have there been any other responses but CHI fans or people stating the obvious?


You can look for yourself, but I haven’t seen any accounts on here that scream Chicago fan.
23 déc. 2019 à 16 h 25
#11
Hawks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,672
Mentions "j'aime": 1,700
Quoting: TheChief
So where's the incentive for FLA to take the worst contract in the league?


Have you seen Carey Price’s contract?
23 déc. 2019 à 16 h 25
#12
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,909
Mentions "j'aime": 5,889
Quoting: BurgerBoss
This sucks. It's like CGY giving up Lucic and Brodie in exchange to Määttä.

Matheson has 6.5 years left on his contract.

I also want to point out that we are retaining on Seabrook, at 5mil AAV is he really the worst?
23 déc. 2019 à 16 h 30
#13
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,752
Mentions "j'aime": 31,471
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
Matheson has 6.5 years left on his contract.

I also want to point out that we are retaining on Seabrook, at 4mil AAV is he really the worst?


Matheson's decent. Also Lucic has 3,5 years. I took a shorter contract compared to Seabrook on purpose.

Also Seabrook's cap hit is $5M, not $4M after retention.
TheChief a aimé ceci.
23 déc. 2019 à 16 h 31
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 881
Mentions "j'aime": 262
Quoting: Jco5ta5
Have you seen Carey Price’s contract?


Price is still useful. Same can't be said about Seabrook.
23 déc. 2019 à 16 h 36
#15
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,909
Mentions "j'aime": 5,889
Quoting: BurgerBoss
Matheson's decent. Also Lucic has 3,5 years. I took a shorter contract compared to Seabrook on purpose.

Also Seabrook's cap hit is $5M, not $4M after retention.

Wow you caught me on that one, I changed it like 3 seconds after I did the math in my head lol. Anyways, You could always switch Matheson with
Anton Strälman and get a similar result.
23 déc. 2019 à 16 h 39
#16
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,752
Mentions "j'aime": 31,471
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
Wow you caught me on that one, I changed it like 3 seconds after I did the math in my head lol. Anyways, You could always switch Matheson with
Anton Strälman and get a similar result.


Wouldn't change the biggest problem, namely that including Seabrook makes it near impossible to re-sign the UFA asset FLA is receiving.

At the very least this move needs a prospect to be moved, and a conditional pick regarding whether the UFA asset gets re-signed or not.

Otherwise it makes literally no sense for the other team to make such a favor for CHI...
23 déc. 2019 à 16 h 58
#17
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,799
Mentions "j'aime": 9,984
To me the most difficult part to see happening in this entire trade is Q actually trading for and playing Gus. Talk about irony. Holy cow. Gus might have actually been the reason (straw that broke the camels back) that Q was fired. Q NEVER liked playing young Dmen and the moment Q was fired...WHAM Gus got more playing time and #1 PP. Gus scores 60 points.

All the other stuff...I actually do think Q would value Seabrook more than people think on here. I also think Q isn't a big fan of Matheson. Not saying Q hates him, but Matheson gives up the puck a lot and that'll put you in the doghouse real quick. It's hard to get out of there, but fighting and defending your teammates is a way to do it. I don't see the trade happening, but i could see Florida doing it.
23 déc. 2019 à 18 h 39
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,981
Mentions "j'aime": 14,624
Man, thanks for the laugh.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage