SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Need a backup and some defence

Créé par: Leafboy101
Équipe: 2019-20 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 7 déc. 2019
Publié: 7 déc. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Rangers trade the value looks good, rangers get a b level center prospect with two way capability, mid round pick in this draft and Hutch was kinda a throw in because leafs would have max of 6 goalies if we kept him so he goes(I know he has 0 value maybe even negative value at this point)

Winnipeg trade I’m not to sure on cause Ceci isn’t bad but he’s not good in my opinion he is an upgrade on the Winnipeg blue line and sending a 4th and retaining salary might help them accept the trade, not sure what poolman’s value is but I’m sure it’s not sky high, maybe leafs send a third instead to make it fair trade? Or does Winnipeg take out there pick to make it fair?

Carolina trade is to get the defence that we need, doubt Carolina would be willing to do this but given there a cheap team maybe they would just to get the first rounder and a high B low A prospect in Bracco, Holl has not a lot of value but he is thrown in to give them a third pairing option on the right side
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Poolman, Tucker
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2021 (WPG)
WPG
  1. Ceci, Cody (1 500 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Edmundson, Joel (1 100 000 $ retained)
CAR
  1. Bracco, Jeremy
  2. Holl, Justin
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
3.
NYR
  1. Brooks, Adam
  2. Hutchinson, Michael
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (CBJ)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de WPG
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $79 414 643 $0 $202 500 $2 085 357 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 634 000 $11 634 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 893 000 $10 893 000 $
AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
694 444 $694 444 $ (Bonis de performance70 000 $$70K)
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
7 déc. 2019 à 9 h 25
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,031
Mentions "j'aime": 280
I like Brooks but I think you are overvaluing. He's going to be a goose kind of guy that shows up at the NHL level and then still takes 2-3 years before he has a breakout...if that breakout even happens.
7 déc. 2019 à 9 h 30
#2
Démarrer sujet
HockeyFan777
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 975
Mentions "j'aime": 108
Quoting: MacerV
I like Brooks but I think you are overvaluing. He's going to be a goose kind of guy that shows up at the NHL level and then still takes 2-3 years before he has a breakout...if that breakout even happens.


He’s a low b center prospect, none the less the trade still has good value to acquire Georgiev
7 déc. 2019 à 9 h 34
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,031
Mentions "j'aime": 280
Quoting: Leafboy101
He’s a low b center prospect, none the less the trade still has good value to acquire Georgiev


I don't think Hutchinson and Brooks really carry much value, maybe that of a 3rd combined. so you have a 3rd +4th for Georgiev, which is a couple rounds shy of the general consensus on what he's going to go for.
7 déc. 2019 à 9 h 38
#4
Démarrer sujet
HockeyFan777
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 975
Mentions "j'aime": 108
Quoting: MacerV
I don't think Hutchinson and Brooks really carry much value, maybe that of a 3rd combined. so you have a 3rd +4th for Georgiev, which is a couple rounds shy of the general consensus on what he's going to go for.


Instead of a fourth make it a third and that should be a better trade then
7 déc. 2019 à 10 h 14
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 1,930
Mentions "j'aime": 418
More for Edmundson than Muzzin? Who is this guy and why are we giving away 1sts for him?
7 déc. 2019 à 10 h 33
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 6,731
Mentions "j'aime": 4,825
WPG says no, Poolman is better than Ceci. He has 5 more points than Ceci and his contract is 5x better lol.
Spleenmaster1002 a aimé ceci.
7 déc. 2019 à 11 h 12
#7
Démarrer sujet
HockeyFan777
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 975
Mentions "j'aime": 108
Quoting: Goulet
More for Edmundson than Muzzin? Who is this guy and why are we giving away 1sts for him?


Edmundson is a solid defender with a good contract and can be offensive if used properly and Jeremy bracco is probably worth grundstrom but holl is worth nothing also a first is to balance them retaining salary and because he’s worth it
7 déc. 2019 à 11 h 28
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,958
Mentions "j'aime": 8,910
Carolina happily accepts.

Rangers laugh and hang up.
We_Want_The_Cup a aimé ceci.
7 déc. 2019 à 13 h 31
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 1,930
Mentions "j'aime": 418
Quoting: Leafboy101
Edmundson is a solid defender with a good contract and can be offensive if used properly and Jeremy bracco is probably worth grundstrom but holl is worth nothing also a first is to balance them retaining salary and because he’s worth it


Holl is comparable to Edmundson, decent depth, and yet one is worth a giant package and the other is worth nothing? The reality is salary is the difference between the two and Holl is a fraction of the cost making him more valuable to the team.
7 déc. 2019 à 13 h 41
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,958
Mentions "j'aime": 8,910
Quoting: Goulet
Holl is comparable to Edmundson, decent depth, and yet one is worth a giant package and the other is worth nothing? The reality is salary is the difference between the two and Holl is a fraction of the cost making him more valuable to the team.


Edmundson is a 2nd pair type. A role he has played on a Cup winner and8s playing on a team loaded defensively.

Holl is a 6/7 type. A role he is playing on a team desperate for D.

No. They are not comparable.
7 déc. 2019 à 15 h 2
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 1,930
Mentions "j'aime": 418
Quoting: Gofnut999
Edmundson is a 2nd pair type. A role he has played on a Cup winner and8s playing on a team loaded defensively.

Holl is a 6/7 type. A role he is playing on a team desperate for D.

No. They are not comparable.


One has a history in the league, one doesn't. Both are currently playing top four, production is nearly identical minus PIMS, size is close, one makes four and a half times more than the other... So yeah, one is a buy low and the other recently got dealt for a buy low because his ceiling is known.

As far as D are concerned, they're very similar. AHL champion versus NHL champion. Know versus unknown.

Rutherford versus Dubas.
7 déc. 2019 à 15 h 9
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,958
Mentions "j'aime": 8,910
Modifié 7 déc. 2019 à 15 h 44
Quoting: Goulet
One has a history in the league, one doesn't. Both are currently playing top four, production is nearly identical minus PIMS, size is close, one makes four and a half times more than the other... So yeah, one is a buy low and the other recently got dealt for a buy low because his ceiling is known.

As far as D are concerned, they're very similar. AHL champion versus NHL champion. Know versus unknown.

Rutherford versus Dubas.



Lol ?. Homerism at it’s finest. ?

Would be like me calling Conor Clifton and Brett Pesce comparable, only i’m not foolish enough to think it or consider it.
8 déc. 2019 à 21 h 27
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 1,930
Mentions "j'aime": 418
Quoting: Gofnut999
Lol ?. Homerism at it’s finest. ?

Would be like me calling Conor Clifton and Brett Pesce comparable, only i’m not foolish enough to think it or consider it.


31 teams, 6 defensemen per, we're talking about players that don't crack the top 100. The difference between them isn't worth the conversation.

Dollars remain the deciding factor.
8 déc. 2019 à 21 h 36
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,958
Mentions "j'aime": 8,910
Modifié 8 déc. 2019 à 21 h 43
Quoting: Goulet
31 teams, 6 defensemen per, we're talking about players that don't crack the top 100. The difference between them isn't worth the conversation.

Dollars remain the deciding factor.



Except Edmundson does, or right around it anyway, while Holl falls more in the 150-175. That’s the difference.

But ya $ is the difference as well. There is a reason why Edmundson, who is younger, has 300 games under his belt and makes 3m while Holl has 40 games and makes minimum. Because of the gap in talent. ??‍♂️
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage