SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Ducky

Créé par: jloose
Équipe: 2019-20 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 4 déc. 2019
Publié: 4 déc. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
2.
NYR
  1. Ceci, Cody
  2. Petan, Nicolas
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (TOR)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CBJ
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $75 661 588 $0 $202 500 $5 838 412 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 634 000 $11 634 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 893 000 $10 893 000 $
AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
694 444 $694 444 $ (Bonis de performance70 000 $$70K)
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
4 déc. 2019 à 12 h 50
#1
Breadman likes Bread
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,492
Mentions "j'aime": 1,729
Rangers most likely decline due to Ceci’s cap hit but not the worst offer.
4 déc. 2019 à 12 h 51
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 344
Mentions "j'aime": 28
Quoting: KingLundqvist30
Rangers most likely decline due to Ceci’s cap hit but not the worst offer.


hes expired at the end of the year. just doing the leafs a favor as part of the deal
4 déc. 2019 à 12 h 53
#3
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,348
Mentions "j'aime": 11,376
Wow, these are both reasonable offers - did not see that coming.
jloose a aimé ceci.
4 déc. 2019 à 13 h 22
#4
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,899
Ducks pass. Bracco has no value and Johnsson has minimal value to the Ducks. And Rielly and Liljegren aren’t an upgrade.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
4 déc. 2019 à 13 h 25
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 221
Mentions "j'aime": 64
Liljegren is a little overkill in the Anaheim deal. Also you’re likely to get roasted by some Leafs fans for even suggesting trading Rielly.
4 déc. 2019 à 13 h 44
#6
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,899
Quoting: BigAnderson
Liljegren is a little overkill in the Anaheim deal. Also you’re likely to get roasted by some Leafs fans for even suggesting trading Rielly.


There’s zero chance the ducks take the deal as is. Liljegren doesn’t even get it done. He’s definitely not overkill.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
4 déc. 2019 à 14 h 0
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 221
Mentions "j'aime": 64
Quoting: Jah1722
There’s zero chance the ducks take the deal as is. Liljegren doesn’t even get it done. He’s definitely not overkill.

Leafs would definitely be the ones losing this trade as is. Rielly is the best player in the deal and Johnsson would be the Ducks 2nd best winger. Bracco is almost ready prospect with top 6 potential. Thats more than enough for two defensemen who can barely crack 30 points in a season. More I break this trade down the worse it looks for the Leafs
4 déc. 2019 à 14 h 33
#8
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,519
Mentions "j'aime": 25,401
Quoting: Jah1722
There’s zero chance the ducks take the deal as is. Liljegren doesn’t even get it done. He’s definitely not overkill.


Don't argue with this guy any more. It's a waste of your time (and ours reading it). He has no clue.
Jah1722 a aimé ceci.
4 déc. 2019 à 14 h 36
#9
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,899
Quoting: BigAnderson
Leafs would definitely be the ones losing this trade as is. Rielly is the best player in the deal and Johnsson would be the Ducks 2nd best winger. Bracco is almost ready prospect with top 6 potential. Thats more than enough for two defensemen who can barely crack 30 points in a season. More I break this trade down the worse it looks for the Leafs


Lol you’re funny. Johnsson is a 3 rd line winger on any team. He’s not that good. Nick Ritchie is heads and shoulder better than him. Rielly is the quality offensive D man every team needs but I wouldn’t take him over Lindholm. You would tho because you like giving up goals. Bracco is a 22 yr old who’s yet to even see NHL ice. He has little to now value. Liljegren is a decent prospect but ANA already has to guys in the 21-22 age range that are at the put up or shut up time. Don’t need another one.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
4 déc. 2019 à 14 h 37
#10
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,519
Mentions "j'aime": 25,401
Lindholm is the Ducks' best defensive d-man on a defense that is superior to Toronto's. Rielly is below average defensively and his 0.7 ppg av (on a much better offensive team) doesn't exceed Lindholm's 0.6 ppg av significantly when you consider that Lindholm has been below par the entire year and all Rielly has to do to get a decent chance at an assist is get the puck across the centre line. Manson is Anaheim's sole NHL-quality RD and the Ducks aren't trading him for Johnsson and two maybes not named Caufield and Byram.
Jah1722 a aimé ceci.
4 déc. 2019 à 14 h 38
#11
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,519
Mentions "j'aime": 25,401
Quoting: Jah1722
Lol you’re funny. Johnsson is a 3 rd line winger on any team. He’s not that good. Nick Ritchie is heads and shoulder better than him. Rielly is the quality offensive D man every team needs but I wouldn’t take him over Lindholm. You would tho because you like giving up goals. Bracco is a 22 yr old who’s yet to even see NHL ice. He has little to now value. Liljegren is a decent prospect but ANA already has to guys in the 21-22 age range that are at the put up or shut up time. Don’t need another one.


Too late.
Jah1722 a aimé ceci.
4 déc. 2019 à 14 h 38
#12
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,899
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Don't argue with this guy any more. It's a waste of your time (and ours reading it). He has no clue.


Lol my bad. I had to look up and make sure Johnsson wasn’t as good as Ritchie and I was right.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
4 déc. 2019 à 16 h 12
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 221
Mentions "j'aime": 64
Quoting: Jah1722
Lol you’re funny. Johnsson is a 3 rd line winger on any team. He’s not that good. Nick Ritchie is heads and shoulder better than him. Rielly is the quality offensive D man every team needs but I wouldn’t take him over Lindholm. You would tho because you like giving up goals. Bracco is a 22 yr old who’s yet to even see NHL ice. He has little to now value. Liljegren is a decent prospect but ANA already has to guys in the 21-22 age range that are at the put up or shut up time. Don’t need another one.

Johnsson put up more goals and points in his first full year in the nhl last year than Ritchie ever has. Rielly has better possession rate than both Lindholm and Manson and scored 28 more points than the two of them combined last year. Last time I checked the way to win in hockey is to score more than your opponent. Lot easier to not get scored on when you have the puck.
4 déc. 2019 à 16 h 28
#14
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,899
Quoting: BigAnderson
Johnsson put up more goals and points in his first full year in the nhl last year than Ritchie ever has. Rielly has better possession rate than both Lindholm and Manson and scored 28 more points than the two of them combined last year. Last time I checked the way to win in hockey is to score more than your opponent. Lot easier to not get scored on when you have the puck.


Except TOR was among the bottom 5-7 in allowing opponents zone time last season.
4 déc. 2019 à 16 h 36
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 344
Mentions "j'aime": 28
The amount of back and forth arguments from both sides leads me to believe the deal is pretty close.
An extra 7th round pick should get it done...
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage