SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

First post

Créé par: TopLineTom43
Équipe: 2019-20 Capitals de Washington
Date de création initiale: 29 oct. 2019
Publié: 30 oct. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Puljujärvi Could be a Connelly 2.0 project. Man I miss that guy. He was very good.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Puljujrvi, Jesse
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
WSH
  1. Hutchinson, Michael
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (CBJ)
2.
WSH
  1. Puljujärvi, Jesse [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
EDM
  1. Johansen, Lucas
  2. Pánik, Richard
Détails additionnels:
LucaJo for Puljujärvi? Depending on how Oiler fans value him I might need to add.

Pánik isn’t setting the world on fire In Washington but oilers need bottom 6 scoring. He comes fairly cheap and could help bring some balance to the bottom 6.

Pánik for a 3rd
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de WSH
Logo de COL
Logo de WSH
Logo de ARI
Logo de CBJ
Logo de EDM
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
2021
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
2022
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $71 729 295 $1 150 000 $632 500 $9 770 705 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 538 462 $9 538 462 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
6 700 000 $6 700 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 350 000 $3 350 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 166 667 $5 166 667 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 415 000 $2 415 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Puljujrvi, Jesse
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Logo de Capitals de Washington
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
700 000 $700 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Capitals de Washington
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance550 000 $$550K)
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
714 166 $714 166 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 345 000 $2 345 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
675 000 $675 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
30 oct. 2019 à 16 h 44
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 28
Mentions "j'aime": 5
The Leafs would use Kaskisuo before trading a 3rd for a guy who is worse than what they currently have.
30 oct. 2019 à 17 h 27
#2
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 233
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: SeaOfBlue
The Leafs would use Kaskisuo before trading a 3rd for a guy who is worse than what they currently have.


Kaskisuo looks like he could be a solid goalie. Probably wouldn’t want to waste him as a backup. Smart move would be to let him play in the ahl and keep developing his skills and playing more games.

Copley vs Hutchinson.
Copley nhl numbers last year
29gp (25gs) 16-8-3 2.98gga .901s% 1so

Hutchinson
5gp (4gs) 0-3-1 4.25gga .885sv% 0so

I would say anything is better than Hutchinson currently. Copley’s numbers are very solid. Needless to say I disagree with you on him being worse. To each their own
1 nov. 2019 à 9 h 57
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Both Johansen and Panik have value and wI'll have decent NHL careers. Puljujarvi does not, and will not.
TopLineTom43 a aimé ceci.
1 nov. 2019 à 11 h 22
#4
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 233
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: Yojimbo
Both Johansen and Panik have value and wI'll have decent NHL careers. Puljujarvi does not, and will not.


I think I’m just being impatient with Pánik but Johansen has been surpassed a few times on the depth chart. I’m losing faith
1 nov. 2019 à 14 h 23
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,044
Mentions "j'aime": 7,751
In what universe does Lucas Johansen have anywhere near Puljujarvi's value? Just because he was once a 1st round pick? He's done nothing since. Besides, the Oilers have way too many LHD prospects already - so many so that they will have to trade several of them within the next 10 months. He would be completely buried on Edmonton's depth chart.

Panik is a 28-year-old 3rd liner who is signed for $2.75M for the next 4 years. He has zero value to the Oilers. Besides, he's currently on LTIR due to an upper body injury.
1 nov. 2019 à 15 h 2
#6
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 233
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: CD282
In what universe does Lucas Johansen have anywhere near Puljujarvi's value? Just because he was once a 1st round pick? He's done nothing since. Besides, the Oilers have way too many LHD prospects already - so many so that they will have to trade several of them within the next 10 months. He would be completely buried on Edmonton's depth chart.

Panik is a 28-year-old 3rd liner who is signed for $2.75M for the next 4 years. He has zero value to the Oilers. Besides, he's currently on LTIR due to an upper body injury.


Oilers bottom 6 is pretty terrible. He’s exactly what the oilers would be looking for. A solid bottom 6 guy who’s solid in both ends. What has Puljujarvi done? Did I miss him being good or something. In what world does he have a higher value than LucaJo? One of these guys is currently playing in North America one isn’t. Now the oilers may not need him bc of depth in their system but value wise both players don’t have much. Puljujarvi is a massive bust.
1 nov. 2019 à 15 h 30
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,044
Mentions "j'aime": 7,751
Quoting: TopLineTom43
Oilers bottom 6 is pretty terrible. He’s exactly what the oilers would be looking for. A solid bottom 6 guy who’s solid in both ends. What has Puljujarvi done? Did I miss him being good or something. In what world does he have a higher value than LucaJo? One of these guys is currently playing in North America one isn’t. Now the oilers may not need him bc of depth in their system but value wise both players don’t have much. Puljujarvi is a massive bust.


Oooo, one of these guys is playing in North America! You do realize Johansen is in the AHL, right? And that JP is playing in a league that's equivalent in skill level? And that Johansen is six months older than Puljujarvi yet has never even played a single NHL game? What does that make him, a bustier bust? What a joke.

And I'm sure Edmonton has zero interest in the Panik contract. You'd need to pay us to take it on. It was a stupid mistake the moment it was signed.
1 nov. 2019 à 15 h 49
#8
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 233
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: CD282
Oooo, one of these guys is playing in North America! You do realize Johansen is in the AHL, right? And that JP is playing in a league that's equivalent in skill level? And that Johansen is six months older than Puljujarvi yet has never even played a single NHL game? What does that make him, a bustier bust? What a joke.

And I'm sure Edmonton has zero interest in the Panik contract. You'd need to pay us to take it on. It was a stupid mistake the moment it was signed.


The capitals are extremely deep defensively. He couldn’t make that roster. Oilers are embarrassing offensively in the bottom 6. He couldn’t make that roster. Playing in North America means he’s committed to the process. He’s not an entitled baby....

To your other point. Bouchard has only played 7 nhl games and 0 of them are this year. Does that make him a bust or does it take longer to develop defensemen? This is just basic hockey stuff. Dont glorify your players it’s a bad look. That being said Bouchard is going to be a stud even tho he only played 7 nhl games. Unlike Puljujarvi who has proven he’s not a nhl talent. At least With the oilers
1 nov. 2019 à 15 h 53
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,044
Mentions "j'aime": 7,751
Quoting: TopLineTom43
The capitals are extremely deep defensively. He couldn’t make that roster. Oilers are embarrassing offensively in the bottom 6. He couldn’t make that roster. Playing in North America means he’s committed to the process. He’s not an entitled baby....

To your other point. Bouchard has only played 7 nhl games and 0 of them are this year. Does that make him a bust or does it take longer to develop defensemen? This is just basic hockey stuff. Dont glorify your players it’s a bad look. That being said Bouchard is going to be a stud even tho he only played 7 nhl games. Unlike Puljujarvi who has proven he’s not a nhl talent. At least With the oilers


- Puljujarvi "couldn't make the roster"? WTF?! You really haven't been paying attention, have you.
- Bouchard just turned pro, Johansen has already been in the AHL for two years. Big difference.

You are one of the most clueless posters on this board, and there are a LOT of clueless people here.
1 nov. 2019 à 16 h 11
#10
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 233
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: CD282
- Puljujarvi "couldn't make the roster"? WTF?! You really haven't been paying attention, have you.
- Bouchard just turned pro, Johansen has already been in the AHL for two years. Big difference.

You are one of the most clueless posters on this board, and there are a LOT of clueless people here.


He was a 4th overall pick that played 139 games and had a point total of 37. That’s .26ppg or 21 points a year. He played 3 seasons which would mean he was either hurt or didn’t play in 107 professional games. He missed 43% of the games he could have possibly played in but I’m the clueless one. If he was such a priority the oilers would have signed him but the reality of the situation is he’s average at best.

Bouchard and LucaJo are 1 year apart. Hardly matters when he decided to turn pro the facts are that he’s in the exact same spot. Both guys are better suited playing in the minor bc it takes long to develop dmen. His 7 game preview was terrible 1g -7. He’s still going to be a great player just wasnt ready. It could be a conditioning issue or a size issue either way dmen take longer.

You need to stop being a huge cry baby. You are so angry that it makes your points seem pointless. I get you think your players are special but he’s not. Yak 2.0
1 nov. 2019 à 16 h 27
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,044
Mentions "j'aime": 7,751
Quoting: TopLineTom43
Bouchard and LucaJo are 1 year apart. Hardly matters when he decided to turn pro


You don't understand how these things work, do you? These guys don't "decide" when to turn pro, it's governed by the NHL-CHL agreement.

Bouchard: October 1999
Johansen: November 1997

Do the math.
1 nov. 2019 à 16 h 33
#12
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 233
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: CD282
You don't understand how these things work, do you? These guys don't "decide" when to turn pro, it's governed by the NHL-CHL agreement.

Bouchard: October 1999
Johansen: November 1997

Do the math.


Okay I went off age not exact birthdate so closer to 2 years difference but doesn’t change my overall point that it takes long to develop dmen than forwards. I also notice you are now focused on the LucaJo Bouchard comparison which was more of an example than the initial point that Puljujarvi value is being glorified by you. But stay angry and maybe some team will pay more for his potential than his actual results.
3 nov. 2019 à 9 h 8
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Quoting: CD282
In what universe does Lucas Johansen have anywhere near Puljujarvi's value? Just because he was once a 1st round pick? He's done nothing since. Besides, the Oilers have way too many LHD prospects already - so many so that they will have to trade several of them within the next 10 months. He would be completely buried on Edmonton's depth chart.

Panik is a 28-year-old 3rd liner who is signed for $2.75M for the next 4 years. He has zero value to the Oilers. Besides, he's currently on LTIR due to an upper body injury.


Johansen hasn't done anything. Puljujarvi has proven that he is not an NHLer. You are correct in that they do not have the same value. Johansen still has value.
Puljujarvi does not.
TopLineTom43 a aimé ceci.
3 nov. 2019 à 9 h 16
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,044
Mentions "j'aime": 7,751
Quoting: Yojimbo
Johansen hasn't done anything. Puljujarvi has proven that he is not an NHLer. You are correct in that they do not have the same value. Johansen still has value.
Puljujarvi does not.


Your obsession with Puljujarvi is unhealthy.
3 nov. 2019 à 10 h 33
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Quoting: CD282
Your obsession with Puljujarvi is unhealthy.


It's not an obsession with Puljujarvi, it's an obsession with pointing out to people when they are delusional and player value. Stop being delusional about Puljujarvi's value and you would stop seeing me.
TopLineTom43 a aimé ceci.
3 nov. 2019 à 10 h 56
#16
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 233
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: Yojimbo
It's not an obsession with Puljujarvi, it's an obsession with pointing out to people when they are delusional and player value. Stop being delusional about Puljujarvi's value and you would stop seeing me.


I literally spelled it out for him and he didn’t get it. He also chirped Pánik who right now would have more value than Puljujarvi. 21 ppg average Isn’t good
3 nov. 2019 à 12 h 37
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Quoting: TopLineTom43
I literally spelled it out for him and he didn’t get it. He also chirped Pánik who right now would have more value than Puljujarvi. 21 ppg average Isn’t good


The "In what universe does Lucas Johansen have anywhere near Puljujarvi's value? Just because he was once a 1st round pick? He's done nothing since." Made me chuckle out loud. Puljujarvi has literally proven that he can not handle the NHL game but all you hear out of Oil-world is how valuable he is. They were delusional about Yakupov and you would think that they would have learned... but nope, even more delusional about Puljujarvi.

Their constant delusion is making some drink the koolaid, $2.9Mx2 but someone recently, so maybe if they keep pushing that sad agenda some GM will fall for it. (Not really)
TopLineTom43 a aimé ceci.
3 nov. 2019 à 13 h 30
#18
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 233
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: Yojimbo
The "In what universe does Lucas Johansen have anywhere near Puljujarvi's value? Just because he was once a 1st round pick? He's done nothing since." Made me chuckle out loud. Puljujarvi has literally proven that he can not handle the NHL game but all you hear out of Oil-world is how valuable he is. They were delusional about Yakupov and you would think that they would have learned... but nope, even more delusional about Puljujarvi.

Their constant delusion is making some drink the koolaid, $2.9Mx2 but someone recently, so maybe if they keep pushing that sad agenda some GM will fall for it. (Not really)


Imagine any other nhl team having as many high end picks as the oilers and still not being good.
3 nov. 2019 à 13 h 37
#19
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 233
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: Yojimbo
The "In what universe does Lucas Johansen have anywhere near Puljujarvi's value? Just because he was once a 1st round pick? He's done nothing since." Made me chuckle out loud. Puljujarvi has literally proven that he can not handle the NHL game but all you hear out of Oil-world is how valuable he is. They were delusional about Yakupov and you would think that they would have learned... but nope, even more delusional about Puljujarvi.

Their constant delusion is making some drink the koolaid, $2.9Mx2 but someone recently, so maybe if they keep pushing that sad agenda some GM will fall for it. (Not really)


Since 2009 oilers have had: 10 years

(4) first overall picks. #1
(9) top 10 overall picks

How do you live with yourself having 4 #1 picks and not being a play off team. I can’t name the last time a team has drafted so poorly. What 1/2 the #1 picks aren’t even on the team. And McDavid is a generational talent so that one was obvious.
5 nov. 2019 à 14 h 20
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 28
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: TopLineTom43
Kaskisuo looks like he could be a solid goalie. Probably wouldn’t want to waste him as a backup. Smart move would be to let him play in the ahl and keep developing his skills and playing more games.

Copley vs Hutchinson.
Copley nhl numbers last year
29gp (25gs) 16-8-3 2.98gga .901s% 1so

Hutchinson
5gp (4gs) 0-3-1 4.25gga .885sv% 0so

I would say anything is better than Hutchinson currently. Copley’s numbers are very solid. Needless to say I disagree with you on him being worse. To each their own



Regardless, Copley is practically worthless because he's overpaid and not great. If Washington likes him as their #3, that's great. We don't need another #3 when we already have two. We need a legit backup.
5 nov. 2019 à 15 h 43
#21
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 233
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: SeaOfBlue
Regardless, Copley is practically worthless because he's overpaid and not great. If Washington likes him as their #3, that's great. We don't need another #3 when we already have two. We need a legit backup.


Well we have 2 # 1 goalies currently but if samsonov wasn’t here he would be #2. And again hutch is the worst goalie in the nhl. Anything would be a massive upgrade.
12 nov. 2019 à 11 h 56
#22
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
These trades are fair, but the Caps should only consider the Edmonton one because Copley slipped through waivers during camp, and Hutchinson might not clear. Hershey needs goalies. Leafs could get Copley for Kasimir and a couple of prospects, because Kasimir, the way I understand it, wouldn't have to clear waivers to get to Hershey.

If Panik gets going, he's a top-six wing. Right now he's playing good defense and killing penalties, and the team is winning some games. Could they use a pick, a prospect, and cap space? Okay. Is it important to them? Not really.
27 nov. 2019 à 12 h 50
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 28
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: TopLineTom43
Well we have 2 # 1 goalies currently but if samsonov wasn’t here he would be #2. And again hutch is the worst goalie in the nhl. Anything would be a massive upgrade.


Copley would not be. The guy has little trade value, and there are a bunch of other deals the Leafs could explore to upgrade their backup position without giving up a 3rd for an overpaid mediocre (at best) goalie. If we wanted to keep a mediocre backup, we would have just kept Garret Sparks for 350k less on the cap.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage