SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

If the leafs didnt overpay

Créé par: Capitalfail67
Équipe: 2019-20 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 16 août 2019
Publié: 16 août 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Let’s assume that Tavares being a ufa wouldn’t take less

This is “market” value for the “big 3”
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $76 605 833 $0 $82 500 $4 894 167 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Marner, Mitch
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Matthews, Austin
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
Nylander, William
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
725 000 $725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 août 2019 à 23 h 13
#51
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: BrandonDubinskyGOAT
You have seen it in the past with fourth line players such as Bryan Bickell and Dave Bolland get 4 million and 5.5 million respectively following their multiple playoff runs, so it’s not unreasonable to think that Jake Guentzel, a legit top line winger wasn’t going to demand premium money in today’s market.


he could've asked for it, but I dont think Rutherford would've been foolish enough to sign him to any contract with a higher cap hit than Crosby
16 août 2019 à 23 h 14
#52
Marner Enthusiast
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,396
Mentions "j'aime": 996
Quoting: Random2152
To be clear, San Jose offered JT 7@13. JT took a discount to come to Toronto.
Crosby's contract is literally illegal today, and would be 12.5aav if he were paid the same money on the max term.


I am aware JT got offered 13 million by the Sharks and 15 million by the Islanders. It was very generous of him to leave money on the table, but he never deserved to get offered 15 million in the first place. He’s not Sidney Crosby and he is only not 1.5 million dollars less valuable than Crosby.
16 août 2019 à 23 h 15
#53
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,420
Mentions "j'aime": 5,726
Quoting: BrandonDubinskyGOAT
But all I see are Leaf fans complaining about why Mitch Marner isn’t willing to take a discount like 6-7 million dollars to help the team win. After both Matthews and Nylander’s refusal to do so, they shouldn’t be surprised that Marner is going the same route.


I don't see anyone complaining that he won't take a 6-7 million dollar discount lol.
What I do see are people saying that his comparables put him at 6@9 (in the new league structure) and 3@7.5 on a bridge deal. I am actually releasing a Marner comparables AGM tomorrow with all the comparisons (it is why I have a bunch of stats on hand right now lol).

While we would LIKE for him to take a discount, most people are asking that he takes a fair paycheque.
16 août 2019 à 23 h 16
#54
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,420
Mentions "j'aime": 5,726
Quoting: BrandonDubinskyGOAT
I am aware JT got offered 13 million by the Sharks and 15 million by the Islanders. It was very generous of him to leave money on the table, but he never deserved to get offered 15 million in the first place. He’s not Sidney Crosby and he is only not 1.5 million dollars less valuable than Crosby.


I mean, 15 points less at 1.5 aav less is 100k per point which is actually right on lol. You can look at cost per point on CF to verify comparables for yourself. JT is also more or less paid fairly, even by UFA standards.
16 août 2019 à 23 h 16
#55
Démarrer sujet
Caps fan idk why
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 11,367
Mentions "j'aime": 4,380
Quoting: SpaghettiPasta
MR had 70 points last year. As a defenseman. SPEZZA is making leauge min to get 20+ points.
Gibson is a top 3 goalie in the league. I would say price and Fleury are ahead of him. You are telling me 5 million for a top 7 goalie in the league isn't good enough because he isn't the second best goalie in the league.


Wtf are you talking about? I said at the time they signed there deal they weren’t as good as they are now. Please don’t be stupid and comment if you didn’t correctly read what I said.
16 août 2019 à 23 h 17
#56
Marner Enthusiast
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,396
Mentions "j'aime": 996
Quoting: mhockey91
he could've asked for it, but I dont think Rutherford would've been foolish enough to sign him to any contract with a higher cap hit than Crosby


No for sure not. I just think Jim Rutherford doesn’t get enough credit for the success he’s had. Fans always bash him and disregard him as a top GM because of his decisions to bring in Johnson and Gudbranson (who hasn’t even been bad). They act like he won those back to back cups by fluke.
16 août 2019 à 23 h 19
#57
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: BrandonDubinskyGOAT
No for sure not. I just think Jim Rutherford doesn’t get enough credit for the success he’s had. Fans always bash him and disregard him as a top GM because of his decisions to bring in Johnson and Gudbranson (who hasn’t even been bad). They act like he won those back to back cups by fluke.


hes been bad since the 2017 Stanley cup. ever since the reaves trade hes been on a downfall.
Random2152 a aimé ceci.
16 août 2019 à 23 h 21
#58
Démarrer sujet
Caps fan idk why
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 11,367
Mentions "j'aime": 4,380
Quoting: Random2152
No? Nothing? Nothing to say at all?

Actually I want to tag @Laudan here as well because Stamkos' 2nd deal was 5 years as well.
Not only was he signed in an era where RFA's got significantly less than they should have, but also the Matthews deal was negotiated under the premise of an 83 mill cap. That would put them as 5@14.01 to 5@11.66, with the gap being the RFA's being underpaid bit. The same story with Kane who got 5@10.61 in that same era of underpaying RFA's

STOP PERPETUATING THE MYTH THAT MATTHEWS IS OVERPAID OR UNDERTERMED. HE IS FAIRLY PAID AND TERMED.


Dude it’s friday night I don’t live on this site. Please control yourself.

And I said Stamkos bc he was a scoring center and Kane is a winger. Don’t be an aggressive moron. I know it’s hard. Hahaha man your nuts if you think Matthews is worth top 5 pay. I feel bad for you. Hahaha
16 août 2019 à 23 h 21
#59
Marner Enthusiast
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,396
Mentions "j'aime": 996
Quoting: Random2152
I mean, 15 points less at 1.5 aav less is 100k per point which is actually right on lol. You can look at cost per point on CF to verify comparables for yourself. JT is also more or less paid fairly, even by UFA standards.


Yes but John Tavares is getting paid like a top 3 centre in the league. Same with Auston Matthews, and honestly neither are. The best 3 centres of the league:

Connor McDavid
Sidney Crosby
Evgeni Malkin
Capitalfail67 a aimé ceci.
16 août 2019 à 23 h 22
#60
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,420
Mentions "j'aime": 5,726
Quoting: Capitalfail67
Dude it’s friday night I don’t live on this site. Please control yourself.

And I said Stamkos bc he was a scoring center and Kane is a winger. Don’t be an aggressive moron. I know it’s hard. Hahaha man your nuts if you think Matthews is worth top 5 pay. I feel bad for you. Hahaha


This isn't an argument lol. I showed you evidence that he is and you are sitting here saying 'lol ur dumb'.
16 août 2019 à 23 h 24
#61
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,420
Mentions "j'aime": 5,726
Quoting: BrandonDubinskyGOAT
Yes but John Tavares is getting paid like a top 3 centre in the league. Same with Auston Matthews, and honestly neither are. The best 3 centres of the league:

Connor McDavid
Sidney Crosby
Evgeni Malkin


Disagree strongly here.

Connor McDavid
Sidney Crosby
Sean Couturier

And you said that Matthews was getting paid equivalently 900k less than Geno, and that this is an issue when you have Geno as the 3rd best C in the world? Lol
16 août 2019 à 23 h 26
#62
Marner Enthusiast
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,396
Mentions "j'aime": 996
Quoting: mhockey91
hes been bad since the 2017 Stanley cup. ever since the reaves trade hes been on a downfall.


Well it’s not easy to keep the team winning after back to back cups, since other teams are going to start to catch up to them plus they couldn’t afford to keep a lot off key players. A few good moves I think include the Dumoulin signing, Scotty Wilson trade, the Sheary trade, Rust signing, McCann & Bjugstad trade, Maatta trade and even the Kessel trade they got back good value. So there have been positives, and a few very bad ones of course.
16 août 2019 à 23 h 31
#63
Démarrer sujet
Caps fan idk why
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 11,367
Mentions "j'aime": 4,380
Quoting: BrandonDubinskyGOAT
Yes but John Tavares is getting paid like a top 3 centre in the league. Same with Auston Matthews, and honestly neither are. The best 3 centres of the league:

Connor McDavid
Sidney Crosby
Evgeni Malkin


Quoting: BrandonDubinskyGOAT
Yes but John Tavares is getting paid like a top 3 centre in the league. Same with Auston Matthews, and honestly neither are. The best 3 centres of the league:

Connor McDavid
Sidney Crosby
Evgeni Malkin


Barkov mackinon Tavares Berg all better than Matthews. Dude only uses goals nothing else I gave up awhile ago. Haha
16 août 2019 à 23 h 34
#64
Marner Enthusiast
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,396
Mentions "j'aime": 996
Quoting: Random2152
Disagree strongly here.

Connor McDavid
Sidney Crosby
Sean Couturier

And you said that Matthews was getting paid equivalently 900k less than Geno, and that this is an issue when you have Geno as the 3rd best C in the world? Lol


Best centres since McDavid entered the league:

1. McDavid
2. Crosby
3. Malkin
4. MacKinnon
5. Barkov
6. Bergeron
6. Tavares
7. Matthews
8. Toews
9. Giroux
10. Backstrom

There should be absolutely no arguement that Malkin is a top 3 centre in the league.
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
16 août 2019 à 23 h 35
#65
Marner Enthusiast
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,396
Mentions "j'aime": 996
Quoting: Capitalfail67
Barkov mackinon Tavares Berg all better than Matthews. Dude only uses goals nothing else I gave up awhile ago. Haha


Quoting: BrandonDubinskyGOAT
Best centres since McDavid entered the league:

1. McDavid
2. Crosby
3. Malkin
4. MacKinnon
5. Barkov
6. Bergeron
6. Tavares
7. Matthews
8. Toews
9. Giroux
10. Backstrom

There should be absolutely no arguement that Malkin is a top 3 centre in the league.


That’s how I ranked it.
Capitalfail67 a aimé ceci.
16 août 2019 à 23 h 43
#66
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,420
Mentions "j'aime": 5,726
Quoting: Capitalfail67
Barkov mackinon Tavares Berg all better than Matthews. Dude only uses goals nothing else I gave up awhile ago. Haha


I use far more than goals you illiterate fool. I've literally been showing you points and goals at the same time. I use underlying metrics as well, a concept you don't seem to understand.
Good lord you are beyond reason.

It is unfortunate that idiots don't understand their own shortcomings.
16 août 2019 à 23 h 46
#67
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,420
Mentions "j'aime": 5,726
Quoting: BrandonDubinskyGOAT
Best centres since McDavid entered the league:

1. McDavid
2. Crosby
3. Malkin
4. MacKinnon
5. Barkov
6. Bergeron
6. Tavares
7. Matthews
8. Toews
9. Giroux
10. Backstrom

There should be absolutely no arguement that Malkin is a top 3 centre in the league.


There is, and alot of it. What are you basing this off of? Malkin is a very good centre, easily top 15, likely top 10, and possibly around the top 5, but 3rd? No ****ing way. Barkov, Couturier and others are better than Malkin hands down.
You're a Pens fan right? You are overvaluing your own player.
16 août 2019 à 23 h 49
#68
Démarrer sujet
Caps fan idk why
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 11,367
Mentions "j'aime": 4,380
Quoting: Random2152
There is, and alot of it. What are you basing this off of? Malkin is a very good centre, easily top 15, likely top 10, and possibly around the top 5, but 3rd? No ****ing way. Barkov, Couturier and others are better than Malkin hands down.
You're a Pens fan right? You are overvaluing your own player.


Irony hahaha
17 août 2019 à 0 h 52
#69
Démarrer sujet
Caps fan idk why
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 11,367
Mentions "j'aime": 4,380
Quoting: Random2152
I use far more than goals you illiterate fool. I've literally been showing you points and goals at the same time. I use underlying metrics as well, a concept you don't seem to understand.
Good lord you are beyond reason.

It is unfortunate that idiots don't understand their own shortcomings.


Stamkos vs Matthews years 1-3

Stamkos.

243 games 119g 233 points. (.96ppg) (.49gpg)

Matthews

212 games 111g 205 points (.97ppg) (.52gpg)

Literally almost identical stats years 1-3. And it’s not absolutely idiotic like comparing him to Kane. Bc Kane is a winger.

Stamkos first contract. 5y x7.5m 11.5% of team salary

Matthews. 5yx11.6m 14.28% of team salary.
(9.1m would be 11%)

So yeah for a player with identical (close to) that’s why I said compare the 2. So by this logic Matthews is overpaid. And you make him seem so good Stamkos literally was scoring at the same pace as Matthews haha and he had 1 season (year 1) where he had 23 goals. Ugh nothing to say haha ?

Mathews pay should be 9.5 like I said. Mind blowing stuff. Like I said but let’s compare wings to center bc that’s intelligent

Quoting: BrandonDubinskyGOAT
That’s how I ranked it.


Matthews is literally Stamkos 2.0. Haha dude said he was close to generational
17 août 2019 à 0 h 59
#70
Démarrer sujet
Caps fan idk why
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 11,367
Mentions "j'aime": 4,380
Quoting: Laudan
Nice ego trip.....fitting along 8 x 13M demand......after 69 and 63 seasons

Everything is the best in TML-land, i know.....sorry for expressing any kind of doubt....

Wheres Kadri, i remember you flaked me with your "knowledge" how he will be Leaf for lifetime......


Dude is delusional. Matthews did them a favor haha ?
17 août 2019 à 1 h 19
#71
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: Random2152
There is, and alot of it. What are you basing this off of? Malkin is a very good centre, easily top 15, likely top 10, and possibly around the top 5, but 3rd? No ****ing way. Barkov, Couturier and others are better than Malkin hands down.
You're a Pens fan right? You are overvaluing your own player.


Couturier??? no way. id say the only "clear cut" are Crosby Mcdavid and MacKinnon. you can argue Malkin at #4. dude has been under a PPG once in his entire career. talk about consistency.
Capitalfail67 a aimé ceci.
17 août 2019 à 1 h 41
#72
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 22,176
Mentions "j'aime": 7,282
Quoting: Random2152
Matthews is a franchise player without doubt, but he is a borderline generational scoring talent (only behind Ovi and Laine in the cap era imo). Here is Matthews vs Kane in the first 3 years before their 2nd contracts.
Name- GPG/PPG
Matthews-- 0.49/0.84 - 0.55/1.02 - 0.54/1.07
Kane--------- 0.26/0.88 - 0.31/0.88 - 0.37/1.07

The Leafs didn't overpay Matthews.
Nylander was at most a 500k overpay.


the leafs 100% overpaid matthews...sort of. 11.634 is completely fair and justified for an 8 year deal. For that player friendly term, they certainly overpaid, and honestly, it's kind of an absurd overpay. According to matthews, it's the equivalent of 13.8 over 8 years.
mhockey91 et Capitalfail67 a aimé ceci.
17 août 2019 à 1 h 51
#73
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: Bcarlo25
the leafs 100% overpaid matthews...sort of. 11.634 is completely fair and justified for an 8 year deal. For that player friendly term, they certainly overpaid, and honestly, it's kind of an absurd overpay. According to matthews, it's the equivalent of 13.8 over 8 years.


agreed. leafs should've got matthews locked in at 8 years with that kind of cap hit
17 août 2019 à 3 h 10
#74
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 3,493
Mentions "j'aime": 1,562
Modifié 17 août 2019 à 8 h 17
Quoting: Capitalfail67
Dude is delusional. Matthews did them a favor haha ?


wouldnt say delusional, hes just one of those that swallows everything thats served on blue platter and says its great, cause its coming from TML. Check his thread from times when signing frenzy started....you cant argue his facts arent logical and on the spot, one of the best breakdowns of contracts back then :

https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/877874

And theres handful of us in TML fan base here that are able to shout : "The Emperor is naked"

My breakdown of Matthews contract right after signing, ppl told me i'm stupid and Matthews just established ( why him and not McDavid who should be entitled to something like that as generational talent ) new way of short-term fair payment politic for RFAs ( we used to call that overpayment in my times )

Quoting: Laudan


My evaluation of Dubas work till now

Tavares - signing ............................................................................................... ( A ) i think that was a sure shot on JT side right after he hits UFA but still let him have merits
Nylander - signing............................................................................................ ( B+ ) explained below
Muzzin - trade .................................................................................................. ( B+ ) we could hunt someone younger with longer term like Manson or Pesce for additional 2x 2nd
Matthews - signing ...........................................................................................( C- ) avalanche of overpayment dragged by this one


NYLANDER (minor fail )

i was giving him 7 x 6,8M in my simulations in Aug 2018 cause 61 + 61 and inflation with cap raise ( otherwise point-contibution would make him 6,5M max)

i still believe Nylander was a pre-made setup, which allowed TML to give him money he wanted but with higher pay-check this year cause it was affordable. By holdout he was losing 20k per day, which in two months resulted in 1,2M deficit on his account. Distract that from 10,27M and you get 2M surplus to spread over 6 years on top of 6,9M contract which makes him 6 x 7,2M, so 600k above what he should get based on his previous two seasons production .In my books not such a tragedy in overpayment. Proly that cost TML the resigning of P.Lindholm at 1,5M next year.

Before signing comparable to :
Kutcherov ( 3 x 4,7M on top of 66 + 65)
Gaudreau ( 6 x 6,7M on top of 64 + 78 )
Monahan ( 7 x 6,4M on top of 34 + 63 + 62 )


MATTHEWS ( major fail )

in my books 7 x 11M in Aug 2018 cause 69 + 63 + "75" and riding on hype ( otherwise points-contribution would make him 8M max )

Lets say for the sake of argument Matthews is as good as McDavid ( he isnt, but still )

McDavid signed 8 x 12,5M in 2017, which would be 13,7M in 2018 with Cap raise ( 6% ) and rounded to 10% cause of "inflation".

8 x 13,7M
7 x 12,5M
6 x 11,3M
5 x 10,1M

The above should be logical descending contracts for Matthews ofc after he would score 100 points in his second season and rolling another 100 this season. You can figure the overpayment in $$ / years of contract by yourself. Maybe not even a tragedy if it wouldnt make precedens for all the other contracts to be signed.

Two other names come to mind ....Draisaitl and Eichel, both marked as centers, both signed 2017-2018, both considered overpayment... so ideal comparables to Matthews

Draisaitl.............51 + 77...............8 x 8,5M ( 128 points in first two seasons, 217 curentlly ).........again if he would sign in 2018 with same stats, it would be 8 x 9,4M..........so 5 x 6,5M ( on spot )
Eichel.................56 + 57...............8 x 10M ( 113 points in first two seasons, 185 curentlly ).............again if he would sign in 2018 with same stats, it would be 8 x 11M..........so 5 x 8M ( overpayment )
Matthews..........63 + 69...............5 x 11,6M ( 132 points in first two seasons, 195 curentlly )

2M overpayment on this if Matthews would be McDavid's level and what i can read from this contract is he is the greedy one ( not Nylander ) and wants to hit UFA asap and move to whoever gives him more.....so another minus from me on his account from TML fan perspective

Ppl here waveing around with : Matthews just gave TML a discount with his 5 x 11,634M ( on top of 63 + 69 seasons ) cause he asked for 8 x 13M ( again on top of 63 + 69 seasons ) and thats his mercifull bowdown to help TML with cap troubles in 2019/2020.
8 x 13,7M is McDavids money if he signed in summer 2018 instead 2017. And hes not McDavid.

Matthews logic of helping TML : 8 x 13M
........................................................7 x 12,6M
........................................................6 x 12,1M
........................................................5 x 11,634M

Each year of Matthews from 6 to 8 as UFA years is worth 455k.......i mean

After those 5x 11,634M Chiarelli looks like genius with McDavid and Draisaitl 8y contracts......

Still to see how Dubarelli will handle :

MARNER

i mostly went with 7 x 8M in Aug 2018 cause 61 + 69 + "90" and taking "hometown discount" ( otherwise points-contribution would make him 8,5M max )

So i went Dubarelli style and sign him for 2 x 7,5M, after bridge is done sign him for 5 x 13M into Matthews greedy face.

Comparables :
Kutcherov ( 3 x 4,7M on top of 66 + 65)
Panarin ( 2 x 6M on top of 77 + 74 )
17 août 2019 à 8 h 16
#75
Marner Enthusiast
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,396
Mentions "j'aime": 996
Quoting: Random2152
There is, and alot of it. What are you basing this off of? Malkin is a very good centre, easily top 15, likely top 10, and possibly around the top 5, but 3rd? No ****ing way. Barkov, Couturier and others are better than Malkin hands down.
You're a Pens fan right? You are overvaluing your own player.


LMAO you can’t be serious. The likes of Barkov, Couturier and literally everyone else on the list have yet to surpass what Malkin did at the age of 22, what Malkin did at his peak or even what Malkin did in the last 5 years.

You said that there are a lot of arguments to be made regarding why Geno isn’t a top 3 center? He’s won the Hart Trophy, 2 Art Ross Trophies, the Conn Smythe Trophy, a Ted Lindsey Award and the Calder Trophy. His points per game average ranks him third amongst active players, only behind Crosby and McDavid, however his points per 60 are 1st. Want me to go on? There’s not one player in your list that can boast the same achievements as Geno.

If Crosby and Ovechkin did not exist, Malkin would be the best player of his generation. If you don’t agree, then you probably on recently started playing hockey.
Capitalfail67 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage