SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

its not that difficult

Créé par: Spanky227
Équipe: 2019-20 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 22 juill. 2019
Publié: 22 juill. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I mean, no trade needs to be made. Rangers really aren't in the cap h311 people think.

Rangers can afford increase for buyout for smith and staal year 2 since Girardi's goes down 2+m and Namestnikov/Kreider are traded at the deadline for nhl ready prospects and/or picks (assuming Namestnikov has a mini break out between panarin and kravtsov)

Year 2, Miller transfers from NCAA to take 2nd LHD pair, shattenkirk gets traded at half at some point for a mid pick, and next year looks like. bonus is we keep fox in NHL for less than 30 games (assuming shattenkirk goes at the deadline) and we get to keep our 2nd rounder in 2020.


Panarin-Zibanejad-Kravtsov
Chytil-Strome-Kakko
Lemieux-Howden-Buchnevich
Fill in - Andersson - Fill in

Skjei-Trouba
Miller - Fox
Hajek - DeAngelo
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
23 000 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de DAL
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NSH
Logo de VAN
2021
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de BUF
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2022
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $74 083 133 $0 $3 982 500 $7 416 867 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 625 000 $4 625 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
833 333 $833 333 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 juill. 2019 à 13 h 22
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 850
Mentions "j'aime": 224
you know that buyout time is over right ?
DakotaMermis4Norris a aimé ceci.
22 juill. 2019 à 13 h 26
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 887
Mentions "j'aime": 334
Quoting: KCarry74
you know that buyout time is over right ?


I don’t think they do. So I guess they are in cap hell. They’re in worse shape than the Leafs.
DakotaMermis4Norris a aimé ceci.
22 juill. 2019 à 13 h 28
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 401
Mentions "j'aime": 78
0 healthy scratches is bold
DakotaMermis4Norris a aimé ceci.
22 juill. 2019 à 13 h 29
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 1,760
Mentions "j'aime": 801
Quoting: KCarry74
you know that buyout time is over right ?


2nd buyout phase in relation to arbitration. Either way this is terrible.
22 juill. 2019 à 13 h 30
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 614
Mentions "j'aime": 86
Quoting: Weezley
I don’t think they do. So I guess they are in cap hell. They’re in worse shape than the Leafs.


Quoting: KCarry74
you know that buyout time is over right ?



2nd buyout window guys, NYR have not yet signed all their RFA filed for arbitration
22 juill. 2019 à 13 h 30
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 1,760
Mentions "j'aime": 801
Quoting: ScottRoth
0 healthy scratches is bold


Also bold having $8m+ in dead cap two years in a row.
22 juill. 2019 à 13 h 47
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,655
Mentions "j'aime": 6,782
Any team can just buyout two players and not dress any extras to make it work. The point is that it isn't ideal and GM's tend to not want to do that.

Are the Rangers in cap he11? yes. Can they make like one or two trades to make it work? Yes.

"Cap he11" doesn't mean there is no solution in sight and the owner might as well fold the team because there is no way they'll ever be able to fit under the cap. Just means they don't have the luxury that most teams have of doing nothing and still being fine.
DakotaMermis4Norris a aimé ceci.
22 juill. 2019 à 14 h 1
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 562
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: F50marco
Any team can just buyout two players and not dress any extras to make it work. The point is that it isn't ideal and GM's tend to not want to do that.

Are the Rangers in cap he11? yes. Can they make like one or two trades to make it work? Yes.

"Cap he11" doesn't mean there is no solution in sight and the owner might as well fold the team because there is no way they'll ever be able to fit under the cap. Just means they don't have the luxury that most teams have of doing nothing and still being fine.



i wanted the devs to offersheet trouba with the intent to secure an overpay, if they os deangelo now that'd be awesome for the rivalry lol

also evolving wild has deangelo at 6 year 4.6MM, not sure the signings are realistic, also not my team just my observation
22 juill. 2019 à 14 h 9
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,742
Mentions "j'aime": 470
Quoting: glc_0908
i wanted the devs to offersheet trouba with the intent to secure an overpay, if they os deangelo now that'd be awesome for the rivalry lol

also evolving wild has deangelo at 6 year 4.6MM, not sure the signings are realistic, also not my team just my observation


Woulda been wild if the Devils signed trouba to a big offer sheet (obv the 2 firsts and 2nd and 3rd or higher the only ones Rangers wouldnt instant match) and JG walks away with flipping the 20th pick and Neal Pionk for 2 firsts from a fringe playoff team + a 2nd and a 3rd...
DakotaMermis4Norris a aimé ceci.
22 juill. 2019 à 14 h 28
#10
Démarrer sujet
Tspky
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 3,887
Mentions "j'aime": 980
Quoting: KCarry74
you know that buyout time is over right ?


Quoting: ScottRoth
0 healthy scratches is bold


Quoting: F50marco
Any team can just buyout two players and not dress any extras to make it work. The point is that it isn't ideal and GM's tend to not want to do that.

Are the Rangers in cap he11? yes. Can they make like one or two trades to make it work? Yes.

"Cap he11" doesn't mean there is no solution in sight and the owner might as well fold the team because there is no way they'll ever be able to fit under the cap. Just means they don't have the luxury that most teams have of doing nothing and still being fine.




Rangers have over 1.766m to make call ups if needed, it'll probably be Shestyorkin, Fox and Andersson on rotation as needed.

8m in dead cap doesn't really affect us as the only players in my scenario that would have to be resigned next summer are Strome and Fast (once again assuming trades of Kreider/Namestnikov, there's your 8m there).
By the time any notable RFAs are up for a new deal, that number is down to less than 3.5m, with lundqvist, shattenkirk also off the books, 20m to sign Buch (if needed anymore), Chytil, Howden, Andersson, Lemieux, Shesterkin and Rykov should be enough.
By the time it'll be to resign Fox, Kravtsov and Kakko, the new TV deal should be in place which is supposed to increase the cap dramatically. Plus natural increase (and probably a larger one with the Seattle expansion.

Would trading help? Obviously, but it isn't a necessity as some are implying.



Quoting: glc_0908
i wanted the devs to offersheet trouba with the intent to secure an overpay, if they os deangelo now that'd be awesome for the rivalry lol

also evolving wild has deangelo at 6 year 4.6MM, not sure the signings are realistic, also not my team just my observation


Whoever signs DeAngelo to that deal has bigger problems than just the compensation. Rangers wouldn't match that at all.
22 juill. 2019 à 14 h 38
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 562
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: Spanky227
Rangers have over 1.766m to make call ups if needed, it'll probably be Shestyorkin, Fox and Andersson on rotation as needed.

8m in dead cap doesn't really affect us as the only players in my scenario that would have to be resigned next summer are Strome and Fast (once again assuming trades of Kreider/Namestnikov, there's your 8m there).
By the time any notable RFAs are up for a new deal, that number is down to less than 3.5m, with lundqvist, shattenkirk also off the books, 20m to sign Buch (if needed anymore), Chytil, Howden, Andersson, Lemieux, Shesterkin and Rykov should be enough.
By the time it'll be to resign Fox, Kravtsov and Kakko, the new TV deal should be in place which is supposed to increase the cap dramatically. Plus natural increase (and probably a larger one with the Seattle expansion.

Would trading help? Obviously, but it isn't a necessity as some are implying.





Whoever signs DeAngelo to that deal has bigger problems than just the compensation. Rangers wouldn't match that at all.


yupp like I said, just what the projection was
22 juill. 2019 à 14 h 39
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,655
Mentions "j'aime": 6,782
Quoting: Spanky227
Rangers have over 1.766m to make call ups if needed, it'll probably be Shestyorkin, Fox and Andersson on rotation as needed.

8m in dead cap doesn't really affect us as the only players in my scenario that would have to be resigned next summer are Strome and Fast (once again assuming trades of Kreider/Namestnikov, there's your 8m there).
By the time any notable RFAs are up for a new deal, that number is down to less than 3.5m, with lundqvist, shattenkirk also off the books, 20m to sign Buch (if needed anymore), Chytil, Howden, Andersson, Lemieux, Shesterkin and Rykov should be enough.
By the time it'll be to resign Fox, Kravtsov and Kakko, the new TV deal should be in place which is supposed to increase the cap dramatically. Plus natural increase (and probably a larger one with the Seattle expansion.

Would trading help? Obviously, but it isn't a necessity as some are implying.





Whoever signs DeAngelo to that deal has bigger problems than just the compensation. Rangers wouldn't match that at all.


Ahh there is a reason teams try to only buyout players as a last ditch resort. I personally would rather just trade Namestnikov and Beleskey and maybe trade/sign Deangelo to a bridge just to make it work this year, rather than buyout two players in one year. 7M in dead cap is such a waste and cap space is paramount.

I'd at least buy out Smith. He isn't even in the lineup most nights. Staal can at least still be a shutdown presense. Buyout Smith and trade Namestnikov for a 4th rounder and your pretty much done.
22 juill. 2019 à 14 h 54
#13
Démarrer sujet
Tspky
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 3,887
Mentions "j'aime": 980
Quoting: F50marco
Ahh there is a reason teams try to only buyout players as a last ditch resort. I personally would rather just trade Namestnikov and Beleskey and maybe trade/sign Deangelo to a bridge just to make it work this year, rather than buyout two players in one year. 7M in dead cap is such a waste and cap space is paramount.

I'd at least buy out Smith. He isn't even in the lineup most nights. Staal can at least still be a shutdown presense. Buyout Smith and trade Namestnikov for a 4th rounder and your pretty much done.


I agree, the buyout should be the last resort. But if teams are not willing to trade for Namestnikov/Shattenkirk for reasonable prices, they should go the buyout route for Smith/Staal as they can fit a good team still. LHD is suspect depending on how Hajek returns from his shoulder injury and Rykov adjusts to NA ice. But overall I like the look of the team still.

Not a true cup contender yet, which is why it'd be really good to maximize Names value playing with Panarin and Kravtsov and letting the KZB line go against weaker competition hopefully inflating Kreiders numbers as well. I know most don't want another sell off, but it's best for the NYR long term to get their final assets. 2020 is a very deep draft so if we could get a mid 1st for kreider it'd be worth it. Was pissed that they didn't make the trade with Colorado when Newhook, Caufield and Krebs were available at 14 (colorado picked 16th so any one of those would've been great for the pipeline, I wanted Newhook too who went 16th)
24 juill. 2019 à 8 h 22
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 401
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: Spanky227
Rangers have over 1.766m to make call ups if needed, it'll probably be Shestyorkin, Fox and Andersson on rotation as needed.

8m in dead cap doesn't really affect us as the only players in my scenario that would have to be resigned next summer are Strome and Fast (once again assuming trades of Kreider/Namestnikov, there's your 8m there).
By the time any notable RFAs are up for a new deal, that number is down to less than 3.5m, with lundqvist, shattenkirk also off the books, 20m to sign Buch (if needed anymore), Chytil, Howden, Andersson, Lemieux, Shesterkin and Rykov should be enough.
By the time it'll be to resign Fox, Kravtsov and Kakko, the new TV deal should be in place which is supposed to increase the cap dramatically. Plus natural increase (and probably a larger one with the Seattle expansion.

Would trading help? Obviously, but it isn't a necessity as some are implying.





Whoever signs DeAngelo to that deal has bigger problems than just the compensation. Rangers wouldn't match that at all.


Just referencing having 0 healthies, what if someone gets hurt in warmups? need at least one healthy scratch, more likely 2 or 3.
24 juill. 2019 à 8 h 48
#15
Démarrer sujet
Tspky
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 3,887
Mentions "j'aime": 980
Quoting: ScottRoth
Just referencing having 0 healthies, what if someone gets hurt in warmups? need at least one healthy scratch, more likely 2 or 3.


Well, as I said they have 1.76m in cap space, you can call up both Nieves (700k) and Andersson(894) and be under the cap (just under but under)
24 juill. 2019 à 8 h 54
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 401
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: Spanky227
Well, as I said they have 1.76m in cap space, you can call up both Nieves (700k) and Andersson(894) and be under the cap (just under but under)


you can call them up when the zamboni is cleaning the ice between warmups and the game starting?
24 juill. 2019 à 10 h 58
#17
Démarrer sujet
Tspky
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 3,887
Mentions "j'aime": 980
Quoting: ScottRoth
you can call them up when the zamboni is cleaning the ice between warmups and the game starting?


lol do you really want me to go into edit to put them on scratched? would that make you happy? or can you just accept the fact that they have room and get over it
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage