Quoting: LoganOllivier
This pendulum ride of lunacy is too much to handle.
1) Marner is a star, you don't score 90+ points unless you are an elite player. I think him and Nylander are a lot closer than some think but they are both top flight players. Top players should get paid big bucks, they make other players better, and should get paid based off that. I don't at all agree that Marner is nothing without an elite centre, Kadri had his best seasons playing with Marner, same with JT. Sure its a symbiotic relationship but its not a one way street. He'll sign for around 10 million I think, I hope its 6 years. And no matter what he signs for, it won't be a problem contract. Problem contracts are guys making more than they are worth and stars are always worth their money when they are in their prime. Its older guys making too much that is the problem or depth players making too much. Some people on here would rather pay guys like Kapanen 5+ to score 50 points than Marner 10 million to score 90+ that just doesn't make sense. Finding a 20 goal scorer when you have star players like TO has is easy. Finding stars is always hard.
Now onto Bouchard.
That's just a silly statement born from ignorance. I am not sure how good he'll be but he's a A prospect for sure. He's a better prospect than Sandin and Liljegren, perhaps a little further away than Liljegren from being NHL ready but not far. Borgman isn't even close to these players, at best he's a bottom pair guy.
I don’t understand what is wrong with you people, you can’t argue against facts! Can we just stop thinking Mitch Marner should get similar money to Auston Matthews? This is getting beyond ridiculous. Ever since entering the league, no player has scored more even strength goals than Matthews, Marner is absolutely not in the same category in terms of individual ability.
William Nylander is a better individual player than Mitch Marner. So far in their careers, Nylander’s Corsi for is 54% whereas Marner’s is only 40%. In fact, each star forward on the Leafs found more success playing with Nylander than with Marner. Kadri has a .86 G/60 playing with Nylander and .85 playing with Marner. Van Riemsdyk has a 1.33 G/60 playing with Nylander and 1.18 with Marner. Tavares has a 6.27 G/60 playing with Nylander and 1.53 with Marner. Matthews has a 1.53 G/60 with Nylander and a 1.04 with Marner. Just stop for a moment and take a look at Marner’s possession metrics and advanced stats:
https://imgur.com/gallery/nVdJHWP
https://imgur.com/a/j04H3vO He literally gets carried by Tavares and is only effective when JT is holding his hand. Across the past 3 seasons at 5v5 in comparison to Marner, Nylander has a higher...
iCF60: 15.03 vs 14.44
iFF60: 11.33 vs 10.64
iSF60: 7.94 vs 7.37
ixG60: 0.78 vs 0.66
So literally the only A3Z metric that rates Marner higher than Nylander across the past 3 years is...nothing.
It is utterly mind-bottling that people think Marner is comparable to Nylander- one drives play at an elite level while the other just waits around for elite centres such as Kadri and Tavares to carry him. I don’t see Marner being anywhere near Nylander’s level. Marner has been sheltered and protected by elite play driving linemates whereas Nylander’s results encompass all manner of adversity and babcock lunacy.
Honestly Mitch Marner in reality is literally the same type of player as Conor Sheary, an average or below average player in terms of skill that relies on elite centres to carry them.