SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

1 trade

Créé par: arafay
Équipe: 2019-20 Jets de Winnipeg
Date de création initiale: 9 juill. 2019
Publié: 9 juill. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
77 375 000 $
26 800 000 $
42 750 000 $
22 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1700 000 $
Transactions
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
2022
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $80 710 000 $0 $447 500 $790 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
7 375 000 $7 375 000 $
AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 800 000 $6 800 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
AG, AD, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
5 291 667 $5 291 667 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
894 167 $894 167 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
2 916 667 $2 916 667 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
700 000 $700 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
700 000 $700 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance175 000 $$175K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 166 667 $6 166 667 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
7 600 000 $7 600 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 225 000 $1 225 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
775 000 $775 000 $ (Bonis de performance60 000 $$60K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
4 333 333 $4 333 333 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 juill. 2019 à 18 h 11
#1
Marner Enthusiast
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,396
Mentions "j'aime": 996
Why should Laine take that? He is better than Marner by several miles.
9 juill. 2019 à 18 h 14
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 7,337
Mentions "j'aime": 2,389
Modifié 9 juill. 2019 à 18 h 20
Quoting: BrandonDubinskyGOAT
Why should Laine take that? He is better than Marner by several miles.


He is way less of a complete player and should prove that he can be a complete player. Anyways, this season yanked his value and he wouldn’t be dumb to bet on himself. He would almost guaranteed make over 11 on his next deal

The way I see it, he could earn 9.5 ish M on his next deal for five years (47.5M total) or 6.8 then about 11.5M (48.1M if you take the bridge and add the first 3 years of 11.5). Heck, he could even bank on there being a large cap increase after his bridge and him getting even 12. I don’t see how he would go wrong with a bridge. He proves he’s more of a complete player while the jets get cap savings during a tough time
9 juill. 2019 à 18 h 23
#3
Billy739
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 6,590
Mentions "j'aime": 1,629
make if Vasalainen for Juulsen and sure

Appleton had a good rookie year , So did Hudon
doesnt mean much for long shot players like these until they're 2-3 seasons in showing consistency .

your Finn oversea's developing though , he's someone we'd move Juulsen for
otherwise there is more value in establishing Juulsen , trading Petry and Promoting Brook .
math731 a aimé ceci.
9 juill. 2019 à 18 h 59
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 7,337
Mentions "j'aime": 2,389
Modifié 9 juill. 2019 à 19 h 5
Quoting: Billy739
make if Vasalainen for Juulsen and sure

Appleton had a good rookie year , So did Hudon
doesnt mean much for long shot players like these until they're 2-3 seasons in showing consistency .

your Finn oversea's developing though , he's someone we'd move Juulsen for
otherwise there is more value in establishing Juulsen , trading Petry and Promoting Brook .


Vesalainen is a future top line winger. No way. Juulsen is good but not that good.

Appleton for juulsen is fair imo. Both teams are deep at those positions and both have similar potential. Juulsen has top 4 upside while appleton has top 6 (more likely middle six though)

I wouldnt say that appleton, juulsen or hudon had good nhl seasons. Hudon definitely not. Juulsen and appleton didn’t get where they would like because of organizational depth blocking the way

Appleton and juulsen are similar age as well.
9 juill. 2019 à 19 h 10
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 95
Mentions "j'aime": 22
Quoting: arafay
Vesalainen is a future top line winger. No way. Juulsen is good but not that good.

Appleton for juulsen is fair imo. Both teams are deep at those positions and both have similar potential. Juulsen has top 4 upside while appleton has top 6 (more likely middle six though)

I wouldnt say that appleton, juulsen or hudon had good nhl seasons. Hudon definitely not. Juulsen and appleton didn’t get where they would like because of organizational depth blocking the way

Appleton and juulsen are similar age as well.


No way habs do that deal. You need to add more.
9 juill. 2019 à 19 h 19
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 7,337
Mentions "j'aime": 2,389
Quoting: habs012
No way habs do that deal. You need to add more.


If we have to add much more we walk away. Don’t need him that bad. The most I would do would be stanley and appleton for juulsen and ikonen (don’t @ me dont know how valuable he is) you can replace ikonen with evans if you like
9 juill. 2019 à 19 h 31
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,057
Mentions "j'aime": 669
Quoting: arafay
Vesalainen is a future top line winger. No way. Juulsen is good but not that good.

Appleton for juulsen is fair imo. Both teams are deep at those positions and both have similar potential. Juulsen has top 4 upside while appleton has top 6 (more likely middle six though)

I wouldnt say that appleton, juulsen or hudon had good nhl seasons. Hudon definitely not. Juulsen and appleton didn’t get where they would like because of organizational depth blocking the way

Appleton and juulsen are similar age as well.


Actually Juulsen was playing some solid top 4 minutes before getting injured, has nothing to do with organizational depth that he hasn't played more.

By the way look up Hudon's first season, wasn't breaking records by any stretch but was decent enough.
9 juill. 2019 à 19 h 40
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 7,337
Mentions "j'aime": 2,389
Quoting: LumberJacques
Actually Juulsen was playing some solid top 4 minutes before getting injured, has nothing to do with organizational depth that he hasn't played more.

By the way look up Hudon's first season, wasn't breaking records by any stretch but was decent enough.


My bad. I though his first season was his last

Appleton is a victim of strong organizational depth on the wings. Even when he was playing he only got 6-7 minutes a game. Not enough for a young player to prove himself. He was very good though when he did play and I could see him even getting 40 pts in an offensive 3rd line

I think that juulsen for appleton is fair.
LumberJacques a aimé ceci.
9 juill. 2019 à 19 h 52
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,057
Mentions "j'aime": 669
Quoting: arafay
My bad. I though his first season was his last

Appleton is a victim of strong organizational depth on the wings. Even when he was playing he only got 6-7 minutes a game. Not enough for a young player to prove himself. He was very good though when he did play and I could see him even getting 40 pts in an offensive 3rd line

I think that juulsen for appleton is fair.


No problem man, I just don't know if he'd get a better opportunity in MTL tbh.

We have a bunch of bottom 6 players ATM and could get even more crowded if Poehling and/or Suzuki make the team this season.
arafay a aimé ceci.
9 juill. 2019 à 20 h 16
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 7,337
Mentions "j'aime": 2,389
Quoting: LumberJacques
No problem man, I just don't know if he'd get a better opportunity in MTL tbh.

We have a bunch of bottom 6 players ATM and could get even more crowded if Poehling and/or Suzuki make the team this season.


He has an opportunity on he jets next season but juulsen is more needed by the jets.

What kind of picks would be needed to get him. Maybe green and a 2nd for juulsen and a 6th doesn’t help you though. Maybe Stanley (could make nhl roster) and a 2nd for juulsen and a 4th
LumberJacques a aimé ceci.
9 juill. 2019 à 20 h 25
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 95
Mentions "j'aime": 22
Quoting: arafay
He has an opportunity on he jets next season but juulsen is more needed by the jets.

What kind of picks would be needed to get him. Maybe green and a 2nd for juulsen and a 6th doesn’t help you though. Maybe Stanley (could make nhl roster) and a 2nd for juulsen and a 4th


yeah, I would do your second proposal.
arafay a aimé ceci.
9 juill. 2019 à 20 h 35
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,057
Mentions "j'aime": 669
Quoting: arafay
He has an opportunity on he jets next season but juulsen is more needed by the jets.

What kind of picks would be needed to get him. Maybe green and a 2nd for juulsen and a 6th doesn’t help you though. Maybe Stanley (could make nhl roster) and a 2nd for juulsen and a 4th


What it really depends on is how Bergevin sees the RHD situation moving forward. If he thinks that Brook and Fleury can take over in the coming years then maybe he tries to package him for a top player.

My guess is that Bergevin is just content to let him play out his ELC and see what happens. If someone outplays him then he'll re-evaluate, otherwise he keeps him.

Your offer is fair though and might get him to bite, who knows with Bergevin.
arafay a aimé ceci.
9 juill. 2019 à 23 h 11
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 33
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: BrandonDubinskyGOAT
Why should Laine take that? He is better than Marner by several miles.


Definitely not paying Laine enough, even for a bridge. But Laine is not even close to Marner. Marner is a better all around player by far
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage