SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Moving Provorov for Marner

Créé par: Jaycee
Équipe: 2019-20 Flyers de Philadelphie
Date de création initiale: 29 juin 2019
Publié: 29 juin 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 125 000 $
710 700 000 $
2775 000 $
65 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
PHI
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2020 (OTT)
OTT
  1. Schlemko, David
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (PHI)
2.
TOR
  1. Provorov, Ivan [Droits de RFA]
  2. Ratcliffe, Isaac
  3. Voracek, Jakub
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (PHI)
3.
PHI
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de NSH
Logo de EDM
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de MTL
Logo de OTT
2021
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
2022
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $71 773 651 $0 $2 995 000 $9 726 349 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
4 137 500 $4 137 500 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
4 333 333 $4 333 333 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
3 571 429 $3 571 429 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
10 700 000 $10 700 000 $
AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
C, AD
UFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
730 833 $730 833 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
678 889 $678 889 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
700 000 $700 000 $
DG, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 juin 2019 à 4 h 2
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 4,002
Mentions "j'aime": 2,584
No thanks. ps no one wants voracek.
aedoran a aimé ceci.
29 juin 2019 à 4 h 28
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,382
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: Sign_em_up000000
No thanks. ps no one wants voracek.


Speak for yourself I'd happily take Voracek. But I'd want a top prospect or 1st or retention on Voracek in the above trade.
29 juin 2019 à 4 h 29
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 4,002
Mentions "j'aime": 2,584
Quoting: BCAPP
Speak for yourself I'd happily take Voracek. But I'd want a top prospect or 1st or retention on Voracek in the above trade.

Why? And in a marner deal??? Really???
29 juin 2019 à 4 h 40
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,382
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: Sign_em_up000000
Why? And in a marner deal??? Really???


Voracek is a tier below Marner sure but he's in the next tier of right wingers. He would be part of a package. The other part would be a top young d. In this case provorov. I think you could build around that. In fact I just made an AGM with it.
29 juin 2019 à 5 h 10
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 4,002
Mentions "j'aime": 2,584
Quoting: BCAPP
Voracek is a tier below Marner sure but he's in the next tier of right wingers. He would be part of a package. The other part would be a top young d. In this case provorov. I think you could build around that. In fact I just made an AGM with it.[/quokonecnk but he's 29 has 5 years left at 8.25 also provorov is asking for 8 ×8 so that's over 16 mill committed for the next 5 years meaning we have to make a separate trade just to accommodate the money and thats not even including hagg also provorov is ledt handed so is the new 8 million dollar man our second pairing lhd or is it Reilly? Or do we have to move Reilly as well too accommodate this trade? All while they have a young goalie frost who was a greyhound and we know dubas loves his former greyhounds or Patrick and konecny all would be better options or would you rather extend Andersen whose been crap come playoff time although not really his fault as he gets overplayed
Do you see my point? Not saying voracek is bad but his contract is for the production u get wouldn't you rather have Duchenne at 10 or panarin at 11 not saying where getting them just that you can spend the money in FA or take 4 1st and trade them to make your team better also Tavares signed to play with mitch on the GTA line i dont think he would be to happy if u told him we traded marner but dont worry we got u voracek
lots of better options
29 juin 2019 à 5 h 47
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 21,796
Mentions "j'aime": 12,099
Quoting: Sign_em_up000000
No thanks. ps no one wants voracek.


Now does anyone really want Zaitsev?
29 juin 2019 à 6 h 2
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 4,002
Mentions "j'aime": 2,584
Quoting: aedoran
Now does anyone really want Zaitsev?


No but some stupid gm will trade for him once all other options are gone!?
aedoran a aimé ceci.
29 juin 2019 à 9 h 54
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 506
Mentions "j'aime": 178
Quoting: Sign_em_up000000
No thanks. ps no one wants voracek.


Wouldn’t say that, not like he just put up 85 points or anything. Nobody wants Zaitsev either at a 5 year deal. Voracek would be a very good piece playing next to Tavares or Matthews and u get a very promising young D man. But everyone has their own opinion.
29 juin 2019 à 10 h 5
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 4,002
Mentions "j'aime": 2,584
Quoting: Jaycee
Wouldn’t say that, not like he just put up 85 points or anything. Nobody wants Zaitsev either at a 5 year deal. Voracek would be a very good piece playing next to Tavares or Matthews and u get a very promising young D man. But everyone has their own opinion.


Did you read my other response? Yes he's a decent player it's his age and contract both money n term and we would have to make at least one more move based on money coming back
He makes zero sense for Toronto especially as a big part of a Marner deal and i never said another team would want Zaitsev I've been on record literally saying once there are no more options left for teams a stupid gm will probably trade for him and i dont expect a big return for him also didn't even think to make it Myers instead of hagg? I mean we literally only habe 1 option on the right side that would be going in this deal
29 juin 2019 à 10 h 13
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 426
Mentions "j'aime": 155
Honestly, overpay for Marner... no value in Zaitsev and we’re giving away a potential franchise D, a 65 point winger and a 6’5 prospect who scored 50 goals in the O. Marners a good player, but this would be desperate
29 juin 2019 à 10 h 38
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 506
Mentions "j'aime": 178
Quoting: carterhart
Honestly, overpay for Marner... no value in Zaitsev and we’re giving away a potential franchise D, a 65 point winger and a 6’5 prospect who scored 50 goals in the O. Marners a good player, but this would be desperate


How would it be desperate? Marner is 21. He will grow with the young core of TK, Patrick Lindblom, Frost and Farabee coming up, as well as contribute now in a big way.
29 juin 2019 à 10 h 43
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 506
Mentions "j'aime": 178
Quoting: Sign_em_up000000
Did you read my other response? Yes he's a decent player it's his age and contract both money n term and we would have to make at least one more move based on money coming back
He makes zero sense for Toronto especially as a big part of a Marner deal and i never said another team would want Zaitsev I've been on record literally saying once there are no more options left for teams a stupid gm will probably trade for him and i dont expect a big return for him also didn't even think to make it Myers instead of hagg? I mean we literally only habe 1 option on the right side that would be going in this deal

Myers instead of Hägg where?
29 juin 2019 à 10 h 45
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 4,002
Mentions "j'aime": 2,584
Quoting: Jaycee
Myers instead of Hägg where?


In the proposed trade
29 juin 2019 à 10 h 48
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 4,002
Mentions "j'aime": 2,584
Quoting: Sign_em_up000000
In the proposed trade


My bad Ratcliffe
29 juin 2019 à 12 h 25
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 426
Mentions "j'aime": 155
Quoting: Jaycee
How would it be desperate? Marner is 21. He will grow with the young core of TK, Patrick Lindblom, Frost and Farabee coming up, as well as contribute now in a big way.


So you lose two major parts of that future in Ratcliffe and Provorov... we don’t need Marner for that kinda price
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage